Suppr超能文献

儿科癫痫的行为健康筛查:美国常用的哪些措施“足够好”?

Behavioral health screening in pediatric epilepsy: Which measures commonly used in the United States are 'good enough'?

机构信息

Medical University of South Carolina, College of Nursing, 99 Jonathan Lucas Street, MSC 160, Charleston, SC 29425, United States.

Cincinnati Children's Hospital and Medical Center, Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, University of Cincinnati-College of Medicine, 3333 Burnett Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45229, United States.

出版信息

Epilepsy Behav. 2022 Sep;134:108818. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2022.108818. Epub 2022 Jul 13.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To improve evidence-based implementation of behavioral health screening measures in pediatric epilepsy care, guidance is needed in the selection and interpretation of evidence-based screening measures. Therefore, the goals of this project were to (1) evaluate the clinical utility and psychometric properties of screening instruments frequently used in the United States (US) for anxiety, depression, and behavior problems in youth with epilepsy (YWE), and (2) provide guidance around selection and interpretation of these behavioral health screening measures.

METHOD

The critique was conducted in three phases: (1) identification of articles based on search criteria; (2) full review of articles for eligibility assessment; (3) evaluation of screening measures and organization into Tiers. Nine behavioral health measures frequently used to screen for anxiety, depression, and disruptive behaviors in the US were selected for evaluation. PubMed, CINAHL, Medline, and APA databases were searched using the following search terms: [target area] + [screening measure] + epilepsy + children [youth], [adolescents]. Inclusion/exclusion criteria for articles were as follows: (1) focused on YWE, (2) written in English, and (3) conducted in the US. Once articles were selected, Hunsley and Mash's criteria were used to evaluate and categorize the screening measures' psychometric properties, which have clear relevance to clinical practice. Measures were also classified into three tiers by the level of validation according to established evidence-based criteria.

RESULTS

Forty-one unique papers were identified through the literature search and assessed as eligible. Evaluation of screening measures revealed only two psychometrically sound measures that met criteria for Tier 1, the NDDI-E-Y and the Pediatric NeuroQoL-Depression, both depression screening measures. Several additional depression screening measures met criteria for Tier 2 (CDI-2, BASC-2-Depression Scale, and CBCL Withdrawn/Depressed Scale). Anxiety screening measures have not been validated in pediatric epilepsy and thus only met the criteria for Tier 2 (BASC-2 Anxiety Scale, CBCL DSM-IV Oriented Anxiety Problems Scale, MASC). Similarly for disruptive behaviors, two measures met Tier 2 criteria (BASC-2 Externalizing Problems Index, CBCL Externalizing Problems Index).

CONCLUSION

Strides have been made in the validation of behavioral health screening measures for YWE; however, continued research in this area is necessary to validate existing psychometrically sound measures and to develop and evaluate epilepsy-specific measures in the pediatric epilepsy population.

摘要

目的

为了提高行为健康筛查措施在儿科癫痫护理中的循证实施,需要在选择和解释基于证据的筛查措施方面提供指导。因此,本项目的目标是:(1)评估在美国频繁用于筛查青少年癫痫患者(YWE)焦虑、抑郁和行为问题的筛查工具的临床实用性和心理测量特性;(2)为这些行为健康筛查措施的选择和解释提供指导。

方法

该评价分三个阶段进行:(1)根据搜索标准确定文章;(2)对文章进行全面审查以进行资格评估;(3)评估筛查措施并将其分为等级。选择了美国常用的九种行为健康措施来筛查焦虑、抑郁和破坏性行为,对其进行评估。使用以下搜索词在 PubMed、CINAHL、Medline 和 APA 数据库中搜索:[目标领域]+[筛查措施]+癫痫+儿童[青年],[青少年]。文章的纳入/排除标准如下:(1)关注 YWE;(2)用英文书写;(3)在美国进行。一旦选择了文章,就使用 Hunsley 和 Mash 的标准来评估和分类筛查措施的心理测量特性,这些特性与临床实践密切相关。根据既定的循证标准,还将这些措施分为三个等级。

结果

通过文献检索确定了 41 篇独特的论文,并评估为合格。对筛查措施的评估仅发现了两个具有良好心理测量特性的措施,符合一级标准,即 NDDI-E-Y 和儿科神经生活质量-抑郁,两者均为抑郁筛查措施。其他一些抑郁筛查措施也符合二级标准(CDI-2、BASC-2-抑郁量表和 CBCL 回避/抑郁量表)。焦虑筛查措施尚未在儿科癫痫中得到验证,因此仅符合二级标准(BASC-2 焦虑量表、CBCL DSM-IV 定向焦虑问题量表、MASC)。同样,对于破坏性行为,有两个措施符合二级标准(BASC-2 外部问题指数、CBCL 外部问题指数)。

结论

在 YWE 的行为健康筛查措施验证方面已经取得了进展;然而,需要在该领域继续研究,以验证现有的具有良好心理测量特性的措施,并为儿科癫痫人群开发和评估癫痫特异性措施。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验