Suppr超能文献

运用 Qsort 方法探究执业医师对计算机临床决策支持系统实施的期望和看法。

An exploration of expectations and perceptions of practicing physicians on the implementation of computerized clinical decision support systems using a Qsort approach.

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 0K12IA, Ghent, Belgium.

Consortium for Justifiable Digital Healthcare, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Jul 16;22(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01933-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is increasing interest in incorporating clinical decision support (CDS) into electronic healthcare records (EHR). Successful implementation of CDS systems depends on acceptance of them by healthcare workers. We used a mix of quantitative and qualitative methods starting from Qsort methodology to explore expectations and perceptions of practicing physicians on the use of CDS incorporated in EHR.

METHODS

The study was performed in a large tertiary care academic hospital. We used a mixed approach with a Q-sort based classification of pre-defined reactions to clinical case vignettes combined with a thinking-aloud approach, taking into account COREQ recommendations The open source software of Ken-Q Analysis version 1.0.6. was used for the quantitative analysis, using principal components and a Varimax rotation. For the qualitative analysis, a thematic analysis based on the four main themes was performed based on the audiotapes and field notes.

RESULTS

Thirty physicians were interviewed (7 in training, 8 junior staff and 15 senior staff; 16 females). Nearly all respondents were strongly averse towards interruptive messages, especially when these also were obstructive. Obstructive interruption was considered to be acceptable only when it increases safety, is adjustable to user expertise level and/or allows deviations when the end-user explains why a deviation is desirable in the case at issue. Transparency was deemed an essential feature, which seems to boil down to providing sufficient clarification on the factors underlying the recommendations of the CDS, so that these can be compared against the physicians' existing knowledge, beliefs and convictions.

CONCLUSION

Avoidance of disruptive workflows and transparency of the underlying decision processes are important points to consider when developing CDS systems incorporated in EHR.

摘要

背景

将临床决策支持(CDS)纳入电子医疗记录(EHR)越来越受到关注。CDS 系统的成功实施取决于医疗保健工作者对其的接受程度。我们使用了定量和定性相结合的方法,从 Qsort 方法开始,探讨了实际医生对 EHR 中纳入的 CDS 使用的期望和看法。

方法

该研究在一家大型三级保健学术医院进行。我们使用了一种混合方法,基于 Q-sort 对临床病例进行分类,结合了思维 aloud 方法,同时考虑到 COREQ 建议。使用 Ken-Q Analysis 版本 1.0.6 的开源软件进行定量分析,使用主成分和 Varimax 旋转。对于定性分析,根据音频和现场记录,基于四个主要主题进行了主题分析。

结果

共采访了 30 名医生(7 名在培训中,8 名初级员工,15 名高级员工;16 名女性)。几乎所有的受访者都强烈反对干扰性信息,尤其是当这些信息也具有阻塞性时。只有当阻塞性中断增加安全性、可根据用户的专业水平进行调整,或者在最终用户解释为什么在当前问题的情况下需要偏离时允许偏离时,才认为这种中断是可以接受的。透明度被认为是一个基本特征,这似乎归结为对 CDS 建议背后的因素提供足够的澄清,以便与医生现有的知识、信仰和信念进行比较。

结论

在开发 EHR 中纳入的 CDS 系统时,避免中断工作流程和透明度是需要考虑的重要因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07a9/9288707/7b1573171297/12911_2022_1933_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验