Department of Urology, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Eur Urol. 2022 Oct;82(4):427-439. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.06.009. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
BACKGROUND: In the phase 3 KEYNOTE-426 (NCT02853331) trial, pembrolizumab + axitinib demonstrated improvement in overall survival, progression-free survival, and objective response rate over sunitinib monotherapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in KEYNOTE-426. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 861 patients were randomly assigned to receive pembrolizumab + axitinib (n = 432) or sunitinib (n = 429). HRQoL data were available for 429 patients treated with pembrolizumab + axitinib and 423 patients treated with sunitinib. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: HRQoL end points were measured using the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Core (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30), EQ-5D visual analog rating scale (VAS), and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Cancer Symptom Index-Disease-Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) questionnaires. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Better or not different overall improvement rates from baseline between pembrolizumab + axitinib and sunitinib were observed for the FKSI-DRS (-0.79% improvement vs sunitinib; 95% confidence interval [CI] -7.2 to 5.6), QLQ-C30 (7.5% improvement vs sunitinib; 95% CI 1.0-14), and EQ-5D VAS (9.9% improvement vs sunitinib; 95% CI 3.2-17). For time to confirmed deterioration (TTcD) and time to first deterioration (TTfD), no differences were observed between arms for the QLQ-C30 (TTcD hazard ratio [HR] 1.0; 95% CI 0.82-1.3; TTfD HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.69-0.97) and EQ-5D VAS (TTcD HR 1.1; 95% CI 0.87-1.3; TTfD HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.83-1.2). TTfD was not different between treatment arms (HR 1.1; 95% CI 0.95-1.3) for the FKSI-DRS, but TTcD favored sunitinib (HR 1.4; 95% CI 1.1-1.7). Patients were assessed during the off-treatment period for sunitinib, which may have underestimated the negative impact of sunitinib on HRQoL. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, patient-reported outcome scales showed that results between the pembrolizumab + axitinib and sunitinib arms were not different, with the exception of TTcD by the FKSI-DRS. PATIENT SUMMARY: Compared with sunitinib, pembrolizumab + axitinib delays disease progression and extends survival, while HRQoL outcomes were not different between groups.
背景:在 KEYNOTE-426(NCT02853331)三期临床试验中,与舒尼替尼单药治疗相比,帕博利珠单抗+阿昔替尼在晚期肾细胞癌(RCC)患者的总生存期、无进展生存期和客观缓解率方面显示出改善。
目的:评估 KEYNOTE-426 的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)。
设计、地点和参与者:共有 861 名患者被随机分配接受帕博利珠单抗+阿昔替尼(n=432)或舒尼替尼(n=429)治疗。共有 429 名接受帕博利珠单抗+阿昔替尼治疗和 423 名接受舒尼替尼治疗的患者可提供 HRQoL 数据。
结果和局限性:与舒尼替尼相比,帕博利珠单抗+阿昔替尼治疗组的 FKSI-DRS(-0.79%的改善率;95%置信区间[CI]:-7.2 至 5.6)、QLQ-C30(7.5%的改善率;95%CI:1.0-14)和 EQ-5D VAS(9.9%的改善率;95%CI:3.2-17)显示出更好或无差异的总体改善率。在 TTcD(帕博利珠单抗+阿昔替尼的风险比[HR]为 1.0;95%CI:0.82-1.3;TTfD HR 为 0.82;95%CI:0.69-0.97)和 EQ-5D VAS(TTcD HR 为 1.1;95%CI:0.87-1.3;TTfD HR 为 0.98;95%CI:0.83-1.2)方面,两种治疗方法之间未观察到 QLQ-C30 和 EQ-5D VAS 的 TTfD 差异。在 FKSI-DRS 方面,TTfD 无差异(HR 为 1.1;95%CI:0.95-1.3),但 TTcD 有利于舒尼替尼(HR 为 1.4;95%CI:1.1-1.7)。在舒尼替尼组中,患者在停药期间进行了评估,这可能低估了舒尼替尼对 HRQoL 的负面影响。
结论:总体而言,患者报告的结局量表显示,除 FKSI-DRS 的 TTcD 外,帕博利珠单抗+阿昔替尼组与舒尼替尼组之间的结果无差异。
患者总结:与舒尼替尼相比,帕博利珠单抗+阿昔替尼可延迟疾病进展并延长生存期,而两组之间的 HRQoL 结果无差异。
N Engl J Med. 2019-2-16
Int J Mol Sci. 2025-6-11
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2023-8-1