Suppr超能文献

KEYNOTE-426 研究:帕博利珠单抗联合阿昔替尼对比舒尼替尼用于晚期肾细胞癌的健康相关生活质量分析。

Health-related Quality of Life Analysis from KEYNOTE-426: Pembrolizumab plus Axitinib Versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

出版信息

Eur Urol. 2022 Oct;82(4):427-439. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.06.009. Epub 2022 Jul 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the phase 3 KEYNOTE-426 (NCT02853331) trial, pembrolizumab + axitinib demonstrated improvement in overall survival, progression-free survival, and objective response rate over sunitinib monotherapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in KEYNOTE-426.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 861 patients were randomly assigned to receive pembrolizumab + axitinib (n = 432) or sunitinib (n = 429). HRQoL data were available for 429 patients treated with pembrolizumab + axitinib and 423 patients treated with sunitinib.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

HRQoL end points were measured using the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Core (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30), EQ-5D visual analog rating scale (VAS), and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Cancer Symptom Index-Disease-Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) questionnaires.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Better or not different overall improvement rates from baseline between pembrolizumab + axitinib and sunitinib were observed for the FKSI-DRS (-0.79% improvement vs sunitinib; 95% confidence interval [CI] -7.2 to 5.6), QLQ-C30 (7.5% improvement vs sunitinib; 95% CI 1.0-14), and EQ-5D VAS (9.9% improvement vs sunitinib; 95% CI 3.2-17). For time to confirmed deterioration (TTcD) and time to first deterioration (TTfD), no differences were observed between arms for the QLQ-C30 (TTcD hazard ratio [HR] 1.0; 95% CI 0.82-1.3; TTfD HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.69-0.97) and EQ-5D VAS (TTcD HR 1.1; 95% CI 0.87-1.3; TTfD HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.83-1.2). TTfD was not different between treatment arms (HR 1.1; 95% CI 0.95-1.3) for the FKSI-DRS, but TTcD favored sunitinib (HR 1.4; 95% CI 1.1-1.7). Patients were assessed during the off-treatment period for sunitinib, which may have underestimated the negative impact of sunitinib on HRQoL.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, patient-reported outcome scales showed that results between the pembrolizumab + axitinib and sunitinib arms were not different, with the exception of TTcD by the FKSI-DRS.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Compared with sunitinib, pembrolizumab + axitinib delays disease progression and extends survival, while HRQoL outcomes were not different between groups.

摘要

背景

在 KEYNOTE-426(NCT02853331)三期临床试验中,与舒尼替尼单药治疗相比,帕博利珠单抗+阿昔替尼在晚期肾细胞癌(RCC)患者的总生存期、无进展生存期和客观缓解率方面显示出改善。

目的

评估 KEYNOTE-426 的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)。

设计、地点和参与者:共有 861 名患者被随机分配接受帕博利珠单抗+阿昔替尼(n=432)或舒尼替尼(n=429)治疗。共有 429 名接受帕博利珠单抗+阿昔替尼治疗和 423 名接受舒尼替尼治疗的患者可提供 HRQoL 数据。

结果和局限性

与舒尼替尼相比,帕博利珠单抗+阿昔替尼治疗组的 FKSI-DRS(-0.79%的改善率;95%置信区间[CI]:-7.2 至 5.6)、QLQ-C30(7.5%的改善率;95%CI:1.0-14)和 EQ-5D VAS(9.9%的改善率;95%CI:3.2-17)显示出更好或无差异的总体改善率。在 TTcD(帕博利珠单抗+阿昔替尼的风险比[HR]为 1.0;95%CI:0.82-1.3;TTfD HR 为 0.82;95%CI:0.69-0.97)和 EQ-5D VAS(TTcD HR 为 1.1;95%CI:0.87-1.3;TTfD HR 为 0.98;95%CI:0.83-1.2)方面,两种治疗方法之间未观察到 QLQ-C30 和 EQ-5D VAS 的 TTfD 差异。在 FKSI-DRS 方面,TTfD 无差异(HR 为 1.1;95%CI:0.95-1.3),但 TTcD 有利于舒尼替尼(HR 为 1.4;95%CI:1.1-1.7)。在舒尼替尼组中,患者在停药期间进行了评估,这可能低估了舒尼替尼对 HRQoL 的负面影响。

结论

总体而言,患者报告的结局量表显示,除 FKSI-DRS 的 TTcD 外,帕博利珠单抗+阿昔替尼组与舒尼替尼组之间的结果无差异。

患者总结

与舒尼替尼相比,帕博利珠单抗+阿昔替尼可延迟疾病进展并延长生存期,而两组之间的 HRQoL 结果无差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验