文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

KEYNOTE-426 研究:帕博利珠单抗联合阿昔替尼对比舒尼替尼用于晚期肾细胞癌的健康相关生活质量分析。

Health-related Quality of Life Analysis from KEYNOTE-426: Pembrolizumab plus Axitinib Versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

出版信息

Eur Urol. 2022 Oct;82(4):427-439. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.06.009. Epub 2022 Jul 15.


DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2022.06.009
PMID:35843776
Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the phase 3 KEYNOTE-426 (NCT02853331) trial, pembrolizumab + axitinib demonstrated improvement in overall survival, progression-free survival, and objective response rate over sunitinib monotherapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in KEYNOTE-426. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 861 patients were randomly assigned to receive pembrolizumab + axitinib (n = 432) or sunitinib (n = 429). HRQoL data were available for 429 patients treated with pembrolizumab + axitinib and 423 patients treated with sunitinib. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: HRQoL end points were measured using the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Core (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30), EQ-5D visual analog rating scale (VAS), and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Cancer Symptom Index-Disease-Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) questionnaires. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Better or not different overall improvement rates from baseline between pembrolizumab + axitinib and sunitinib were observed for the FKSI-DRS (-0.79% improvement vs sunitinib; 95% confidence interval [CI] -7.2 to 5.6), QLQ-C30 (7.5% improvement vs sunitinib; 95% CI 1.0-14), and EQ-5D VAS (9.9% improvement vs sunitinib; 95% CI 3.2-17). For time to confirmed deterioration (TTcD) and time to first deterioration (TTfD), no differences were observed between arms for the QLQ-C30 (TTcD hazard ratio [HR] 1.0; 95% CI 0.82-1.3; TTfD HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.69-0.97) and EQ-5D VAS (TTcD HR 1.1; 95% CI 0.87-1.3; TTfD HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.83-1.2). TTfD was not different between treatment arms (HR 1.1; 95% CI 0.95-1.3) for the FKSI-DRS, but TTcD favored sunitinib (HR 1.4; 95% CI 1.1-1.7). Patients were assessed during the off-treatment period for sunitinib, which may have underestimated the negative impact of sunitinib on HRQoL. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, patient-reported outcome scales showed that results between the pembrolizumab + axitinib and sunitinib arms were not different, with the exception of TTcD by the FKSI-DRS. PATIENT SUMMARY: Compared with sunitinib, pembrolizumab + axitinib delays disease progression and extends survival, while HRQoL outcomes were not different between groups.

摘要

背景:在 KEYNOTE-426(NCT02853331)三期临床试验中,与舒尼替尼单药治疗相比,帕博利珠单抗+阿昔替尼在晚期肾细胞癌(RCC)患者的总生存期、无进展生存期和客观缓解率方面显示出改善。

目的:评估 KEYNOTE-426 的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)。

设计、地点和参与者:共有 861 名患者被随机分配接受帕博利珠单抗+阿昔替尼(n=432)或舒尼替尼(n=429)治疗。共有 429 名接受帕博利珠单抗+阿昔替尼治疗和 423 名接受舒尼替尼治疗的患者可提供 HRQoL 数据。

结果和局限性:与舒尼替尼相比,帕博利珠单抗+阿昔替尼治疗组的 FKSI-DRS(-0.79%的改善率;95%置信区间[CI]:-7.2 至 5.6)、QLQ-C30(7.5%的改善率;95%CI:1.0-14)和 EQ-5D VAS(9.9%的改善率;95%CI:3.2-17)显示出更好或无差异的总体改善率。在 TTcD(帕博利珠单抗+阿昔替尼的风险比[HR]为 1.0;95%CI:0.82-1.3;TTfD HR 为 0.82;95%CI:0.69-0.97)和 EQ-5D VAS(TTcD HR 为 1.1;95%CI:0.87-1.3;TTfD HR 为 0.98;95%CI:0.83-1.2)方面,两种治疗方法之间未观察到 QLQ-C30 和 EQ-5D VAS 的 TTfD 差异。在 FKSI-DRS 方面,TTfD 无差异(HR 为 1.1;95%CI:0.95-1.3),但 TTcD 有利于舒尼替尼(HR 为 1.4;95%CI:1.1-1.7)。在舒尼替尼组中,患者在停药期间进行了评估,这可能低估了舒尼替尼对 HRQoL 的负面影响。

结论:总体而言,患者报告的结局量表显示,除 FKSI-DRS 的 TTcD 外,帕博利珠单抗+阿昔替尼组与舒尼替尼组之间的结果无差异。

患者总结:与舒尼替尼相比,帕博利珠单抗+阿昔替尼可延迟疾病进展并延长生存期,而两组之间的 HRQoL 结果无差异。

相似文献

[1]
Health-related Quality of Life Analysis from KEYNOTE-426: Pembrolizumab plus Axitinib Versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Eur Urol. 2022-10

[2]
Health-related quality-of-life outcomes in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab or everolimus versus sunitinib (CLEAR): a randomised, phase 3 study.

Lancet Oncol. 2022-6

[3]
Pembrolizumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib monotherapy as first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-426): extended follow-up from a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.

Lancet Oncol. 2020-12

[4]
A Matching-adjusted Indirect Comparison of Nivolumab Plus Cabozantinib Versus Pembrolizumab Plus Axitinib in Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Eur Urol Oncol. 2023-6

[5]
Pembrolizumab plus Axitinib versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma.

N Engl J Med. 2019-2-16

[6]
Patient-Reported Outcomes in KEYNOTE-564: Adjuvant Pembrolizumab Versus Placebo for Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Oncologist. 2024-2-2

[7]
Pembrolizumab Plus Axitinib Versus Sunitinib as First-line Treatment of Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: 43-month Follow-up of the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-426 Study.

Eur Urol. 2023-11

[8]
Health-related quality of life in patients with microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair deficient metastatic colorectal cancer treated with first-line pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy (KEYNOTE-177): an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.

Lancet Oncol. 2021-5

[9]
Patient-reported outcomes of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib (CheckMate 214): a randomised, phase 3 trial.

Lancet Oncol. 2019-1-15

[10]
Pembrolizumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: outcomes of Japanese patients enrolled in the randomized, phase III, open-label KEYNOTE-426 study.

Int J Clin Oncol. 2022-1

引用本文的文献

[1]
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (ccRCC).

Int J Mol Sci. 2025-6-11

[2]
Using Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Narrative Review.

Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2025-1-17

[3]
Time to deterioration of patient-reported outcome endpoints in cancer clinical trials: targeted literature review and best practice recommendations.

J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024-12-18

[4]
Real-World Primary Resistance to First-Line Immune-Based Combinations in Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma (ARON-1).

Target Oncol. 2024-11

[5]
Quality of life and patient-reported toxicities in patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma treated with combined nivolumab and ipilimumab with or without stereotactic body radiation therapy.

Cancer Med. 2024-7

[6]
Using three-dimensional model-based tumour volume change to predict the symptom improvement in patients with renal cell cancer.

3 Biotech. 2024-5

[7]
Risk model based on genes regulating the response of tumor cells to T-cell-mediated killing in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Aging (Albany NY). 2024-2-1

[8]
Bibliometric analysis on the progress of immunotherapy in renal cell carcinoma from 2003-2022.

Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2023-8-1

[9]
Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of pembrolizumab+axitinib versus sunitinib in patients with advanced clear-cell renal cell carcinoma in the Netherlands.

Front Oncol. 2023-6-28

[10]
Immune checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy leads to more nephrotoxicity in advanced renal cell carcinoma patients.

World J Urol. 2023-7

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索