Newhuadu Business School, Minjiang University, No.200 Xiyuangong Road, Shangjie Town, Minhou County, Fuzhou City, Fujian, 350108, China.
School of Economics and Management, Chongqing Jiaotong University, No. 66 Xuefu Avenue, Nan'an District, Chongqing, China.
J Environ Manage. 2022 Oct 1;319:115696. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115696. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
Biopesticides have been recognized as viable alternatives to chemical pesticides in controlling agricultural pests for plants and reducing harmful chemical residues. However, small and marginal farmers are facing challenges while adopting biopesticides, namely, high cost and complicated application techniques, resulting in a low level of farmer acceptance. Accordingly, Farmer Producer Organizations (FPOs), voluntarily formed by farmers, develop mutual technical assistance among their members to solve the technical problems of biopesticide adoption. This study assumes that as a new form of farmer cooperative, FPOs have the potential to promote biopesticide adoption through the implementation of collective pesticide adoption (CPA). Along this line, this paper uses a cooperative game-based hybrid method to develop an incentive mechanism of biopesticide adoption for FPOs to implement CPAs. First, we construct a CPA decision model for mixed pesticides (i.e., biopesticides and chemical pesticides) based on multichoice goal programming (MCGP) to compromise the conflicting objectives regarding cost efficiency and chemical residue reduction, thereby obtaining the optimal total cost of pesticide adoption. Second, recognizing the optimal total adoption cost as a baseline, we devise a cooperative game-based cost allocation scheme to maintain farmers' voluntary participation in FPOs. This study demonstrates that the CPA implemented based on our proposed models can at least match if not surpass the economic and environmental performance of farmers' independent pesticide adoption (IPA). We further demonstrate that the proposed cooperative game solution is more suitable for the FPO's cost allocation issue than the eminent solutions, such as the Shapley value.
生物农药已被公认为是替代化学农药防治农业害虫和减少有害化学残留的可行选择。然而,小农户和边际农户在采用生物农药时面临着一些挑战,例如成本高和应用技术复杂,导致农民接受程度低。因此,农民生产者组织(FPO)作为一种由农民自愿组成的新型合作组织,在成员之间发展相互技术援助,以解决生物农药采用中的技术问题。本研究假设,作为一种新的农民合作形式,FPO 通过实施集体农药采用(CPA)有潜力促进生物农药的采用。沿着这条思路,本文使用基于合作博弈的混合方法为 FPO 制定了一个生物农药采用的激励机制,以实施 CPAs。首先,我们基于多目标规划(MCGP)构建了一个混合农药(即生物农药和化学农药)的 CPA 决策模型,以权衡成本效率和减少化学残留之间的冲突目标,从而获得最佳的农药采用总成本。其次,我们以最优总采用成本为基准,设计了一个基于合作博弈的成本分配方案,以维持农民自愿参与 FPO。研究表明,基于我们提出的模型实施的 CPA 至少可以匹配,如果不是超过农民独立农药采用(IPA)的经济和环境绩效。我们进一步证明,与 Shapley 值等知名解决方案相比,所提出的合作博弈解决方案更适合 FPO 的成本分配问题。