Ferràs-Tarragó J, Sanchis-Alfonso V, Ramírez-Fuentes C, Roselló-Añón A, Elía-Martínez I
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain.
Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2022 Nov-Dec;66(6):T36-T42. doi: 10.1016/j.recot.2022.07.016. Epub 2022 Jul 17.
Accurate measurement of femoral torsion is essential to diagnosing, correct surgical decision-making, and the preoperative planning of derotational osteotomies in a subgroup of anterior knee pain patients and patellofemoral instability. Several measurement techniques have been described with great variability in the magnitude of the values. Moreover, none of them can predict the effect of rotational osteotomy on the femoral version value. The purpose of the present work is to develop a method to reliably measure femoral torsion as well as to evaluate the effects of osteotomy on the femoral version angle.
30 patients without previous signs neither symptoms of patellofemoral pain or patellofemoral instability and with a lower limbs CT were selected. Their femoral torsion was measured using the classic Jeanmart and the Murphy's method by two independent radiologists. Independently, two orthopedic surgeons measured femoral torsion with the 3D method described in this study. The intraclass coefficient correlation and the Bland-Altman tests were used to analyze qualitatively and quantitatively the intraobserver and interobserver variability of the method regarding the Jeanmart's and Murphy's method. The confidence interval of the Normal values of the new method were defined and a lineal regression analysis between the 3D-Jeanmart's and 3D-Muphy's methods was performed.
The mean femoral version with the 3D method was 12.74° (SD 5.96°, 95% CI: 11.67°-13.82°). With Jeanmart's method, it was 12.84° (SD 8.60°, 95% CI: 11.28°-14.39°) and 15.87° (SD 10.68°, 95% CI: 13.94°-17.80°) with Murphy's method, being these differences not statistically significant. Both interobserver and intraobserver agreement of the 3D method were high.
The method presented in this study allows for the reliable quantification of femoral torsion in a reproducible way. This method can be applied in several open access 3D image programmes what makes its implementation in the healthcare centres possible from now on.
准确测量股骨扭转对于诊断、正确的手术决策以及部分前膝痛患者和髌股关节不稳患者的旋转截骨术前规划至关重要。已经描述了几种测量技术,但其测量值的大小差异很大。此外,它们都无法预测旋转截骨对股骨扭转值的影响。本研究的目的是开发一种可靠测量股骨扭转的方法,并评估截骨对股骨扭转角度的影响。
选取30例既往无髌股关节疼痛或髌股关节不稳体征及症状且行下肢CT检查的患者。两名独立的放射科医生采用经典的让马尔(Jeanmart)法和墨菲(Murphy)法测量其股骨扭转。另外,两名骨科医生采用本研究中描述的三维(3D)方法测量股骨扭转。采用组内相关系数和布兰德 - 奥特曼(Bland - Altman)检验,定性和定量分析该方法相对于让马尔法和墨菲法在观察者间和观察者内的变异性。确定了新方法正常值的置信区间,并对3D - 让马尔法和3D - 墨菲法进行了线性回归分析。
3D方法测得的平均股骨扭转角度为12.74°(标准差5.96°,95%置信区间:11.67° - 13.82°)。让马尔法测得的值为12.84°(标准差8.60°,95%置信区间:11.28° - 14.39°),墨菲法测得的值为15.87°(标准差10.68°,95%置信区间:13.94° - 17.80°),这些差异无统计学意义。3D方法在观察者间和观察者内的一致性都很高。
本研究提出的方法能够以可重复的方式可靠地量化股骨扭转。该方法可应用于多个开放获取的3D图像程序,这使得从现在起在医疗中心实施该方法成为可能。