Xu Yunyun, Chen Yangyun, Shi Yan, Lu Jianhua, Wu Zonglin, Liu Zhe, Chen Yuerong, Ni Wenqin, Ding Qike, Dai Wei, Wu Xinyuan, Fang Jianqiao, Wu Yuanyuan
The Third Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, People's Republic of China.
Department of Acupuncture & Tuina, Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Hang Zhou City, Zhejiang Province, People's Republic of China.
J Pain Res. 2022 Jul 13;15:1959-1970. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S370751. eCollection 2022.
The efficacy of conventional treatments for treating bladder pain syndrome (BPS) remains unsatisfactory. Electro-acupuncture (EA) is one of the complementary treatments with great analgesic effect and minimal side effect, but evidence of the efficacy of EA on BPS is limited. Thus, this study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of EA for treating BPS and study on central mechanism of patients with BPS.
METHODS/DESIGN: The study is a randomized controlled and assessor-blinded design trial. A total of 84 participants will be randomly assigned to medication group (n=21), EA group (n=42) and sham electro-acupuncture (SA) group (n=21) in a 1:2:1 allocation ratio. This trial will include baseline period, 4-week treatment period and 4-week follow-up period. Participants in medication group will undergo treatment of amitriptyline for a period of 4 weeks. Participants in EA and SA groups will receive a 30 min EA or SA treatment for a total of 12 sessions over 4 weeks. The primary outcome is the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The secondary outcomes include the O'Leary-Sant questionnaire, 24-hour voiding diary, Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA), Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The VAS will be collected at baseline, week 2, week 4, and week 8 after randomization. The O'Leary-Sant questionnaire, HAMA and HAMD will be assessed at baseline, week 4 and week 8 after randomization. The 24-hour voiding diary will be assessed every single day. The fMRI data will be collected at baseline and week 4.
The results will provide evidence on the efficacy and safety of EA in the management of BPS and investigate the central mechanism of EA in treating patients with BPS.
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05279963. Registered on 15 March 2022.
膀胱疼痛综合征(BPS)的传统治疗效果仍不尽人意。电针(EA)是一种辅助治疗方法,具有显著的镇痛效果且副作用极小,但EA治疗BPS疗效的证据有限。因此,本研究旨在探讨EA治疗BPS的疗效和安全性,并研究BPS患者的中枢机制。
方法/设计:本研究为随机对照、评估者盲法设计试验。总共84名参与者将按1:2:1的分配比例随机分为药物组(n = 21)、电针组(n = 42)和假电针(SA)组(n = 21)。本试验将包括基线期、4周治疗期和4周随访期。药物组参与者将接受为期4周的阿米替林治疗。电针组和假电针组参与者将接受30分钟的电针或假电针治疗,4周内共12次。主要结局指标是视觉模拟量表(VAS)。次要结局指标包括奥利里-桑特问卷、24小时排尿日记、汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)、汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)和功能磁共振成像(fMRI)。VAS将在随机分组后的基线、第2周、第4周和第8周收集。奥利里-桑特问卷、HAMA和HAMD将在随机分组后的基线、第4周和第8周进行评估。24小时排尿日记将每天进行评估。fMRI数据将在基线和第4周收集。
研究结果将为电针治疗BPS的疗效和安全性提供证据,并探究电针治疗BPS患者的中枢机制。
ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT05279963。于2022年3月15日注册。