University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA.
Western New England University, Springfield, MA, USA.
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2024 Jun;68(8):849-866. doi: 10.1177/0306624X221113530. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
The normalization of deviance in the form of prison rape finds common themes in media, rape myths, and common discourse. However, these portrayals fail to include real world policies and the perspectives of incarcerated populations. As such, the normalization of deviance is assessed in the context of the implementation of the Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA). A thematic analysis was conducted using qualitative survey responses from 407 males incarcerated in three medium-level security state prisons in the Southern United States. Surprisingly, respondents rejected stereotypical notions of sexuality (institutional deviancy) and snitching (cultural deviancy) surrounding prison rape. Rather, respondents favored standardized safety procedures and institutional responses designed to reduced risk, while also endorsing views that traditional snitching codes were not applicable to prison rape. This study provides implications for researchers and practitioners, particularly in the context of the implementation of PREA.
正常化偏差的形式监狱强奸在媒体、强奸神话和常见话语中都有共同的主题。然而,这些描述未能包括现实世界的政策和被监禁人群的观点。因此,偏差的正常化是在执行《监狱强奸消除法》(PREA)的背景下进行评估的。对来自美国南部三个中等安全级别州立监狱的 407 名男性囚犯的定性调查答复进行了主题分析。令人惊讶的是,受访者拒绝了围绕监狱强奸的刻板的性观念(制度偏差)和告密(文化偏差)。相反,受访者赞成旨在降低风险的标准化安全程序和机构反应,同时也认可传统告密准则不适用于监狱强奸的观点。本研究为研究人员和从业者提供了启示,特别是在执行 PREA 的背景下。