TIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston MA (A.F., D.D.B., J.-G.P., V.M.B.-Z, D.A.M., E.A.B.).
Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (L.K.N., J.N.K).
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2022 Aug;15(8):e008652. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.121.008652. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
With the improvement in outcomes for acute coronary syndrome (ACS), the practice of routine admission to cardiac intensive care units (CICUs) is evolving. We aimed to describe the epidemiology of patients with ACS admitted to contemporary CICUs.
Using the CCCTN (Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network) Registry for consecutive medical CICU admissions across 26 advanced CICUs in North America between 2017 and 2020, we identified patients with a primary diagnosis of ACS at CICU admission and compared patient characteristics, resource utilization, and outcomes to patients admitted with a non-ACS diagnosis and across sub-populations of patients with ACS, including by indication for CICU admission.
Of 10 118 CICU admissions, 29.4% (n=2978) were for a primary diagnosis of ACS, with significant interhospital variability (range, 13.4%-56.6%). Compared with patients admitted with a diagnosis other than ACS, patients with ACS had fewer comorbidities, lower acute severity of illness with less utilization of advanced CICU therapies (41.3% versus 66.1%, <0.0001), and lower CICU mortality (5.4% versus 9.9%, <0.0001). Monitoring alone, without another CICU indication at the time of admission, was the most frequent admission indication in patients with ACS (53.8%); less common indications in patients with ACS included respiratory insufficiency, shock, or the need for vasoactive therapy. Of patients with ACS admitted for monitoring alone, 94.8% did not subsequently require advanced intensive care unit therapies and had a low CICU length of stay (1.5 days [0.9-2.4] versus 2.6 [1.4-5.1], <0.0001) and CICU mortality (0.6% versus 11.0%, <0.0001), compared with patients with ACS with an admission indication beyond monitoring.
In a registry of tertiary care CICUs, ACS represent ≈1/3 of all admissions with significant variability across hospitals. More than half of the ACS admissions to the CICU were for routine monitoring alone, with a low rate of complications and mortality. This observation highlights an opportunity for prospective studies to refine triage strategies for lower risk patients with ACS.
随着急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)治疗效果的改善,常规入住心脏重症监护病房(CICU)的做法正在发生变化。本研究旨在描述当代 CICU 收治的 ACS 患者的流行病学特征。
利用 CCCTN(心血管重症监护临床试验网络)登记处,连续纳入 2017 年至 2020 年间北美 26 家先进 CICU 中因 ACS 入住 CICU 的患者,根据患者在 CICU 入院时的主要诊断,比较患者特征、资源利用情况和结局,并根据患者的 ACS 亚组(包括入住 CICU 的适应证)进行比较。
在 10118 例 CICU 住院患者中,29.4%(n=2978)的患者因 ACS 被诊断为主要诊断,不同医院之间存在显著差异(范围为 13.4%-56.6%)。与因其他诊断而入住 CICU 的患者相比,ACS 患者合并症较少,急性严重程度较轻,接受高级 CICU 治疗的比例较低(41.3% vs. 66.1%,<0.0001),CICU 死亡率也较低(5.4% vs. 9.9%,<0.0001)。在 ACS 患者中,最常见的入院指征是单纯监测(53.8%),而在 ACS 患者中,不太常见的入院指征包括呼吸功能不全、休克或需要血管活性治疗。在因单纯监测而入院的 ACS 患者中,94.8%的患者随后不需要接受高级重症监护病房治疗,且 CICU 住院时间较短(1.5 天[0.9-2.4]vs. 2.6[1.4-5.1],<0.0001),CICU 死亡率也较低(0.6% vs. 11.0%,<0.0001),与因监测以外的适应证而入院的 ACS 患者相比。
在一个三级心脏重症监护病房的登记处中,ACS 占所有入院患者的三分之一左右,不同医院之间存在显著差异。超过一半的 ACS 患者因常规监测而入住 CICU,并发症和死亡率均较低。这一观察结果突出了前瞻性研究的机会,可以为风险较低的 ACS 患者制定更精细的分诊策略。