Kolwelter Julie, Striepe Kristina, Bosch Agnes, Kannenkeril Dennis, Ott Christian, Schiffer Mario, Schmieder Roland E
Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Ulmenweg 18, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2022 Jul 21;14(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s13098-022-00874-1.
After initiating cardioprotective agents, a fall of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) has been reported in several studies. Our goal was to evaluate the accuracy of change of Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) eGFR in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) after short-term pharmacological intervention with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, angiotensin-receptor blocker, gliptin or sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor.
We analyzed 190 patients with T2D in the early stage of the disease, having no overt renal impairment by CKD-EPI equation. In each patient, we measured GFR (mGFR) by applying the constant infusion input clearance technique with sinistrin (Inutest; Fresenius, Linz, Austria) at baseline and after short-term (4-12 weeks) pharmacological intervention with cardioprotective agents (ramipril, telmisartan, linagliptin, metformin, empagliflozin) that potentially lead to an alteration of renal function. Simultaneously, a standardized analysis of serum creatinine was performed and eGFR was estimated by the CKD-EPI equation.
Average mGFR was 111 ± 20 ml/min/1.73m, whereas eGFR was lower with 93 ± 13 ml/min/1.73m. The ratio eGFR/mGFR in relation to mGFR was almost curvilinear, showing an underestimation of renal function by eGFR in the upper normal range. At baseline only 80 patients (42%) lay within ± 10% of mGFR and the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) was extremely low (- 0.07). After short-term pharmacological intervention changes in eGFR and mGFR correlated with each other (r = 0.286, p < 0.001). For example, for a given mGFR of 111 ml/min/1.73m, a change of mGFR by ± 10% corresponded to ± 11 ml/min/1.73m, but the confidence interval of eGFR was 25 ml/min/1.73m. The CCC was low (0.22).
The agreement between eGFR by CKD-EPI and mGFR is modest and the change of renal function after short-term pharmacological intervention is not accurately and precisely reflected by the change of eGFR in patients with T2D in the early stage of their disease.
在启动心脏保护药物治疗后,多项研究报告了估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)下降。我们的目标是评估在2型糖尿病(T2D)患者中,经血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂、血管紧张素受体阻滞剂、格列汀或钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂进行短期药物干预后,慢性肾脏病流行病学协作组(CKD-EPI)eGFR变化的准确性。
我们分析了190例处于疾病早期、根据CKD-EPI公式无明显肾功能损害的T2D患者。对每位患者,在基线时以及经可能导致肾功能改变的心脏保护药物(雷米普利、替米沙坦、利格列汀、二甲双胍、恩格列净)进行短期(4-12周)药物干预后,采用以sinistrin(Inutest;奥地利林茨费森尤斯公司)进行持续输注输入清除率技术测量肾小球滤过率(mGFR)。同时,对血清肌酐进行标准化分析,并通过CKD-EPI公式估算eGFR。
平均mGFR为111±20ml/min/1.73m²,而eGFR较低,为93±13ml/min/1.73m²。eGFR/mGFR与mGFR的比值几乎呈曲线关系,表明在正常范围上限eGFR对肾功能存在低估。在基线时,仅80例患者(42%)的eGFR在mGFR的±10%范围内,一致性相关系数(CCC)极低(-0.07)。短期药物干预后,eGFR和mGFR的变化相互相关(r = 0.286,p < 0.001)。例如,对于给定的mGFR为111ml/min/1.73m²,mGFR变化±10%相当于±11ml/min/1.73m²,但eGFR的置信区间为25ml/min/1.73m²。CCC较低(0.22)。
CKD-EPI的eGFR与mGFR之间的一致性一般,在疾病早期的T2D患者中,短期药物干预后肾功能的变化未被eGFR的变化准确且精确地反映出来。