Suppr超能文献

冻融胚胎体外受精中序贯胚胎移植结局:一项回顾性研究。

The outcomes of sequential embryo transfer in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization with frozen-thawed embryos: A retrospective study.

机构信息

Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2022 Oct;48(10):2563-2570. doi: 10.1111/jog.15369. Epub 2022 Jul 22.

Abstract

AIM

To explore whether sequential embryo transfer benefits patients with repeated implantation failure (RIF) undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles.

METHODS

We included 311 patients with a history of RIF in this retrospective study. We did sequential transfers with a cleavage embryo on day 3 and a blastocyst on day 5 in 77 patients; blastocyst transfers with two blastocysts on day 5 in 80 patients; and cleavage embryo transfers with two cleavage embryos on day 3 in 154 patients. We compared clinical outcomes between the three groups.

RESULTS

The clinical pregnancy rate was comparable between the blastocyst transfer group (48.8%), the sequential transfer group(48.1%) and the cleavage embryo transfer group (48.1%). There was no statistically significant difference found (p > 0.05). The ongoing pregnancy and multipregnancy rates were also comparable between the three groups (p > 0.05). The early miscarriage rate was significantly higher in the sequential transfer group (32.4%) compared with the blastocyst group (12.8%) and the cleavage embryo group (12.2%) (p < 0.05). However, after adjusting for confounders, there was no significant difference in early miscarriage rates in the sequential transfer group compared with the blastocyst group (odds ratio [OR], 2.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85-9.24; p = 0.07) and the cleavage embryo group (OR, 3.03; 95% CI, 0.94-8.06; p = 0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

Sequential embryo transfer failed to improve clinical outcomes for patients with RIF.

摘要

目的

探讨反复着床失败(RIF)患者行冻融胚胎移植(FET)周期时,序贯胚胎移植是否获益。

方法

本回顾性研究纳入了 311 例 RIF 病史患者。77 例患者行第 3 天卵裂期胚胎序贯移植,第 5 天移植囊胚;80 例患者行第 5 天两个囊胚移植;154 例患者行第 3 天两个卵裂期胚胎移植。比较三组患者的临床结局。

结果

囊胚移植组(48.8%)、序贯移植组(48.1%)和卵裂期胚胎移植组(48.1%)的临床妊娠率相当,差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。三组的活产率和多胎妊娠率也相当(p>0.05)。序贯移植组的早期流产率(32.4%)显著高于囊胚组(12.8%)和卵裂期胚胎组(12.2%)(p<0.05)。然而,在校正混杂因素后,序贯移植组与囊胚组(优势比[OR],2.97;95%置信区间[CI],0.85-9.24;p=0.07)和卵裂期胚胎组(OR,3.03;95% CI,0.94-8.06;p=0.08)的早期流产率差异均无统计学意义。

结论

序贯胚胎移植未能改善 RIF 患者的临床结局。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验