The relevance of a biological definition of life to fundamental rights.
作者信息
Main E J
出版信息
Med Law. 1987;6(3):189-209.
PMID:3586886
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
The relevance of a biological definition of life to fundamental rights.
Med Law. 1987;6(3):189-209.
2
To what do we have moral obligations and why? I.
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Jun 1;290(6482):1646-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.290.6482.1646.
3
To what do we have moral obligations and why? II.
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Jun 8;290(6483):1734-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.290.6483.1734.
4
In vitro fertilisation: the major issues.
J Med Ethics. 1984 Mar;10(1):32-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.10.1.32.
5
Human embryos and the argument from potential.
J Med Ethics. 1991 Jun;17(2):59-61. doi: 10.1136/jme.17.2.59.
6
Abortion and the golden rule.
Philos Public Aff. 1975 Spring;4(3):201-22.
7
Medical ethics and the value of human life.
Philos Context. 1984;14:42-50. doi: 10.5840/philcontext1984147.
8
Pregnancy, obstetrics and the moral status of the fetus.
J Med Ethics. 1988 Mar;14(1):3-4. doi: 10.1136/jme.14.1.3.
9
The ethical responsibilities at issue.
In Vitro. 1977 Oct;13(10):595-611. doi: 10.1007/BF02615109.
10
Abortion and the Good Samaritan.
Logos (Santa Clara). 1982;3:79-90.
Zotero 插件