• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤外科技能维持的区域性军民合作初步评估。

Initial Assessment of a Regional Military-Civilian Partnership on Trauma Surgery Skills Sustainment.

机构信息

Department of Trauma, Cook County Health, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.

Navy Medicine Readiness and Training Command Great Lakes, North Chicago, IL 60064, USA.

出版信息

Mil Med. 2023 Jul 22;188(7-8):e2462-e2466. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usac229.

DOI:10.1093/milmed/usac229
PMID:35880592
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Trauma surgery skills sustainment and maintenance of combat readiness present a major problem for military general surgeons. The Military Health System (MHS) utilizes the knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSA) threshold score of 14,000 as a measure of annual deployment readiness. Only 9% of military surgeons meet this threshold. Most military-civilian partnerships (MCPs) utilize just-in-time training models before deployment rather than clinical experiences in trauma at regular intervals (skills sustainment model). Our aim is to evaluate an established skills sustainment MCP utilizing KSAs and established military metrics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three U.S. Navy active duty general surgeons were embedded into an urban level-1 trauma center taking supervised trauma call at regular intervals prior to deployment. Operative density (procedures/call), KSA scores, trauma resuscitation exposure, and combat casualty care relevant cases (CCC-RCs) were reviewed.

RESULTS

During call shifts with a Navy surgeon present an average 16.4 trauma activations occurred; 32.1% were category-1, 27.6% were penetrating, 72.4% were blunt, and 33.8% were admitted to the intensive care unit. Over 24 call shifts of 24 hours in length, 3 surgeons performed 39 operative trauma cases (operative density of 1.625), generating 11,683 total KSA points. Surgeons 1, 2, and 3 generated 5109, 3167, and 3407 KSA points, respectively. The three surgeons produced a total of 11,683 KSA points, yielding an average of 3,894 KSA points/surgeon. In total, 64.1% of operations fulfilled CCC-RC criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this initial evaluation, a military surgeon taking two calls/month over 12 months through our regional skills sustainment MCP can generate more than 80% of the KSA points required to meet the MHS KSA threshold for deployment readiness, with the majority being CCC-RCs. Intangible advantages of this model include exposure to multiple trauma resuscitations while possibly eliminating just-in-time training and decreasing pre-deployment requirements.

摘要

简介

创伤外科技能的维持和战备状态的保持对普通外科军医来说是一个重大问题。军事卫生系统 (MHS) 将知识、技能和能力 (KSA) 阈值分数 14000 用作年度部署准备情况的衡量标准。只有 9%的军事外科医生达到这一标准。大多数军民伙伴关系 (MCP) 在部署前只采用即时培训模式,而不是定期进行创伤临床经验(技能维持模式)。我们的目标是利用 KSA 和既定的军事指标来评估现有的技能维持 MCP。

材料和方法

三名美国海军现役普通外科医生被派驻到一家城市一级创伤中心,在部署前定期接受监督创伤值班。审查了手术密度(手术/值班)、KSA 评分、创伤复苏暴露和战斗伤员救治相关病例(CCC-RC)。

结果

在有海军外科医生值班的值班期间,平均发生 16.4 次创伤激活;32.1%为 1 类,27.6%为穿透伤,72.4%为钝器伤,33.8%收入重症监护病房。在 24 小时长的 24 次值班中,3 名外科医生进行了 39 例手术创伤病例(手术密度为 1.625),共产生 11683 个 KSA 点。外科医生 1、2 和 3 分别产生了 5109、3167 和 3407 KSA 点。这三名外科医生共产生了 11683 个 KSA 点,平均每名外科医生产生 3894 个 KSA 点。总共,64.1%的手术符合 CCC-RC 标准。

结论

根据这一初步评估,一名通过我们的区域技能维持 MCP 每月进行两次值班的海军外科医生,在 12 个月内可以产生超过 80%的 KSA 点,以满足 MHS KSA 部署准备的阈值要求,其中大部分是 CCC-RC。该模型的无形优势包括接触多次创伤复苏,同时可能消除即时培训并减少部署前的要求。

相似文献

1
Initial Assessment of a Regional Military-Civilian Partnership on Trauma Surgery Skills Sustainment.创伤外科技能维持的区域性军民合作初步评估。
Mil Med. 2023 Jul 22;188(7-8):e2462-e2466. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usac229.
2
Quality of Integration of Air Force Trauma Surgeons Within the Center for Sustainment of Trauma and Readiness Skills, Cincinnati: A Pilot Study.空军创伤外科医生在辛辛那提创伤与准备技能维持中心的整合质量:一项试点研究。
Mil Med. 2024 Aug 30;189(9-10):2100-2106. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usad441.
3
Level I academic trauma center integration as a model for sustaining combat surgical skills: The right surgeon in the right place for the right time.一级学术创伤中心整合作为维持战斗外科技能的模式:在正确的时间将合适的外科医生置于正确的地点。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 Jun;78(6):1176-81. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000649.
4
Optimizing combat readiness for military surgeons without trauma fellowship training: Engaging the "voluntary faculty" model.优化无创伤专科培训的军事外科医生的战备能力:采用“志愿教员”模式。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2023 Aug 1;95(2S Suppl 1):S31-S35. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004040. Epub 2023 May 15.
5
Variability of Value of Trauma Centers to General Surgery Combat Casualty Care Skill Sustainment.创伤中心对普通外科战救技能维持的价值存在差异。
J Surg Educ. 2021 Jul-Aug;78(4):1275-1279. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.12.002. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
6
Analysis of Surgical Volume in Military Medical Treatment Facilities and Clinical Combat Readiness of US Military Surgeons.美军军医手术量分析与临床作战准备能力
JAMA Surg. 2022 Jan 1;157(1):43-50. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.5331.
7
Trauma surgical skill sustainment at the University of Chicago AMEDD Military-Civilian Trauma Team Training Site: an observation report.芝加哥大学美国陆军医疗部军事-民用创伤团队训练基地的创伤外科技能维持:一份观察报告。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2024 Jan 24;9(1):e001177. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2023-001177. eCollection 2024.
8
Civilian-Military Trauma Partnerships and the Visiting Surgeon Model for Maintaining Medical Readiness.军民创伤伙伴关系和外聘外科医生模式维持医疗准备。
J Surg Educ. 2019 May-Jun;76(3):738-744. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.10.008. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
9
Advanced Surgical Skills for Exposure in Trauma (ASSET) course improves military surgeon confidence.高级创伤手术显露技能(ASSET)课程提高了军医的信心。
Am J Disaster Med. 2024;19(1):45-51. doi: 10.5055/ajdm.0469.
10
Case Volume and Readiness to Deploy: Clinical Opportunities for Active-Duty Surgeons Outside of Military Hospitals.病例量与部署准备:非军医院现役外科医生的临床机会。
J Am Coll Surg. 2023 Aug 1;237(2):221-228. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000697. Epub 2023 Mar 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation and Implication of Case Volume Variation in Level 1 and 2 Trauma Centers.一级和二级创伤中心病例数量变化的评估及其影响
Ann Surg Open. 2025 Jun 12;6(2):e589. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000589. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Supporting early-career military general surgeons: an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma Military Committee position paper.支持早期职业军队普通外科医生:东部创伤外科学会军事委员会立场文件
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2024 Oct 12;9(1):e001555. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001555. eCollection 2024.
3
Comparison of military and civilian surgeon outcomes with emergent trauma laparotomy in a mature military-civilian partnership.
在成熟的军民合作关系中,对军事外科医生和民用外科医生进行急诊创伤剖腹手术的结果比较。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2024 Mar 1;9(1):e001332. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2023-001332. eCollection 2024.
4
Optimizing combat readiness for military surgeons without trauma fellowship training: Engaging the "voluntary faculty" model.优化无创伤专科培训的军事外科医生的战备能力:采用“志愿教员”模式。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2023 Aug 1;95(2S Suppl 1):S31-S35. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004040. Epub 2023 May 15.