• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经心尖经导管主动脉瓣置换术:三级中心的真实世界早期和中期结果

Transapical Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Real-World Early and Mid-Term Outcome of a Third-Level Centre.

作者信息

Francica Alessandra, Tonelli Filippo, Saran Alberto, Pesarini Gabriele, Vendramin Igor, Tabbì Rocco, Rossetti Cecilia, Luciani Giovanni Battista, Ribichini Flavio L, Onorati Francesco

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Paediatrics, and Gynaecology, Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Verona Medical School, 37126 Verona, Italy.

Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Verona Medical School, 37126 Verona, Italy.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 18;11(14):4158. doi: 10.3390/jcm11144158.

DOI:10.3390/jcm11144158
PMID:35887922
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9323015/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transapical transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TA-TAVR) is generally considered to be associated with higher morbidity compared with transfemoral-TAVR. However, TA-TAVR remains a feasible alternative for patients who are unsuitable for TF-TAVR. It has been shown that outcomes after TAVR are linked to the operator's expertise. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to report short- and mid-term outcomes after TA-TAVR performed by an expert Heart-Team of a third-level centre.

METHODS

From 2015 to 2022, 154 consecutive patients underwent TA-TAVR. The outcomes were analysed according to the VARC-3 criteria. Kaplan-Meier curves were estimated for major clinical events at mid-term follow-up.

RESULTS

The mean age of the population was 79.3 years and the STS risk-score of mortality was 4.2 ± 3.6%. Periprocedural mortality was 1.9%. Acute kidney injury and prolonged ventilation occurred in 1.9%. Incidence of stroke was 0.6%. Pacemaker implantation rate was 1.9%. Freedom from cardiovascular mortality was 75.7%, and 60.2% at 3 and 5 years. Freedom from stroke was 92.3% and 88.9% at 3 and 5 years, respectively; freedom from endocarditis was 94.4% and 90.8% at 3 and 5 years, respectively.

CONCLUSION

TA-TAVR may be considered a safe and effective alternative approach in patients unsuitable for TF-TAVR, especially when performed by a proficient Heart-Team.

摘要

背景

与经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TF-TAVR)相比,经心尖经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TA-TAVR)通常被认为具有更高的发病率。然而,对于不适合TF-TAVR的患者,TA-TAVR仍然是一种可行的替代方案。已经表明,TAVR后的结果与术者的专业技能有关。因此,本研究的目的是报告由三级中心的专业心脏团队进行TA-TAVR后的短期和中期结果。

方法

2015年至2022年,154例连续患者接受了TA-TAVR。根据VARC-3标准分析结果。对中期随访时的主要临床事件估计Kaplan-Meier曲线。

结果

患者的平均年龄为79.3岁,STS死亡风险评分为4.2±3.6%。围手术期死亡率为1.9%。急性肾损伤和通气时间延长的发生率为1.9%。卒中发生率为0.6%。起搏器植入率为1.9%。3年和5年时心血管死亡率的无事件生存率分别为75.7%和60.2%。3年和5年时卒中的无事件生存率分别为92.3%和88.9%;3年和5年时心内膜炎的无事件生存率分别为94.4%和90.8%。

结论

对于不适合TF-TAVR的患者,TA-TAVR可被视为一种安全有效的替代方法,尤其是由熟练的心脏团队进行时。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73bc/9323015/9d35e13ff8d5/jcm-11-04158-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73bc/9323015/c64478036d16/jcm-11-04158-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73bc/9323015/90d5535cb0a8/jcm-11-04158-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73bc/9323015/960bf4f0612f/jcm-11-04158-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73bc/9323015/4c9103c0c290/jcm-11-04158-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73bc/9323015/9d35e13ff8d5/jcm-11-04158-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73bc/9323015/c64478036d16/jcm-11-04158-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73bc/9323015/90d5535cb0a8/jcm-11-04158-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73bc/9323015/960bf4f0612f/jcm-11-04158-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73bc/9323015/4c9103c0c290/jcm-11-04158-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73bc/9323015/9d35e13ff8d5/jcm-11-04158-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Transapical Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Real-World Early and Mid-Term Outcome of a Third-Level Centre.经心尖经导管主动脉瓣置换术:三级中心的真实世界早期和中期结果
J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 18;11(14):4158. doi: 10.3390/jcm11144158.
2
Dose approach matter? A meta-analysis of outcomes following transfemoral versus transapical transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经股动脉与经心尖途径行主动脉瓣置换术的结局:剂量相关吗?一项荟萃分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Jul 28;21(1):358. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02158-4.
3
Immediate and Intermediate Outcome After Transapical Versus Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经心尖与经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的即刻和中期结果
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Jan 15;117(2):245-51. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.036. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
4
Direct Comparison of Feasibility and Safety of Transfemoral Versus Transaortic Versus Transapical Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经股动脉入路与经主动脉入路和经心尖入路经导管主动脉瓣置换术的可行性和安全性的直接比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Nov 28;9(22):2320-2325. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.08.009.
5
Propensity-matched comparisons of clinical outcomes after transapical or transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a placement of aortic transcatheter valves (PARTNER)-I trial substudy.经心尖或股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术后临床结局的倾向性匹配比较:放置主动脉经导管瓣膜(PARTNER)-I 试验子研究。
Circulation. 2015 Jun 2;131(22):1989-2000. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.012525. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
6
Transapical Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Is Associated With Increased Cardiac Mortality in Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction: Insights From the PARTNER I Trial.经心尖经导管主动脉瓣置换术与左心室功能障碍患者的心脏死亡率增加相关:来自 PARTNER I 试验的见解。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Dec 11;10(23):2414-2422. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.09.023.
7
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement using the SAPIEN 3 valve versus surgical aortic valve replacement using the rapid deployment INTUITY valve: Midterm outcomes.使用SAPIEN 3瓣膜的经导管主动脉瓣置换术与使用快速部署INTUITY瓣膜的外科主动脉瓣置换术:中期结果。
J Card Surg. 2021 Feb;36(2):610-617. doi: 10.1111/jocs.15275. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
8
Transapical aortic valve replacement versus surgical aortic valve replacement: A subgroup analyses for at-risk populations.经心尖主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术:针对高危人群的亚组分析。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Dec;162(6):1701-1709.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.02.078. Epub 2020 Feb 29.
9
Transapical versus transfemoral approach and risk of acute kidney injury following transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a propensity-adjusted analysis.经心尖与经股动脉入路及经导管主动脉瓣置换术后急性肾损伤风险:一项倾向调整分析
Ren Fail. 2017 Nov;39(1):13-18. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2016.1244072. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
10
Impact of transfemoral versus transapical access on mortality among patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经股动脉与经心尖入路对接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术的严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者死亡率的影响。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2016 Jul-Aug;17(5):318-21. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2016.05.002. Epub 2016 May 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of porcelain aorta on outcomes in transfemoral aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with balloon-expandable valves.瓷化主动脉对经股动脉植入球囊扩张瓣膜的主动脉瓣置换术(TAVI)预后的影响。
Open Heart. 2025 Jan 30;12(1):e003069. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2024-003069.

本文引用的文献

1
2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease.2021年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会瓣膜性心脏病管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2022 Feb 12;43(7):561-632. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab395.
2
Real World Performance Evaluation of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术的真实世界性能评估
J Clin Med. 2021 Apr 27;10(9):1890. doi: 10.3390/jcm10091890.
3
Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: Updated Endpoint Definitions for Aortic Valve Clinical Research.瓣膜学术研究联合会 3:主动脉瓣临床研究更新终点定义。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Jun 1;77(21):2717-2746. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.02.038. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
4
Transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with aortic diseases.经心尖入路经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗主动脉疾病患者。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Jun 14;59(6):1174-1181. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab050.
5
2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2020 ACC/AHA 瓣膜性心脏病患者管理指南:执行摘要:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会联合临床实践指南委员会的报告。
Circulation. 2021 Feb 2;143(5):e35-e71. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000932. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
6
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Balloon-Expandable Valves: Comparison of SAPIEN 3 Ultra Versus SAPIEN 3.经皮球囊扩张式主动脉瓣置换术:SAPIEN 3 Ultra 与 SAPIEN 3 的比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Nov 23;13(22):2631-2638. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.07.013. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
7
Hemodynamic comparison of transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the SAPIEN 3 Ultra versus SAPIEN 3: The HomoSAPIEN registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与 SAPIEN 3Ultra 与 SAPIEN 3 的血流动力学比较:HomoSAPIEN 注册研究。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jun 1;97(7):E982-E991. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29281. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
8
National Trends of Outcomes in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) Through Transapical Versus Endovascular Approach: From the National Inpatient Sample (NIS).经心尖与经血管入路行经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)的全国性结局趋势:来自全国住院患者样本(NIS)。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020 Aug;21(8):964-970. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2020.05.010. Epub 2020 May 15.
9
Transaxillary compared with transcarotid access for TAVR: a propensity-matched comparison from a French multicentre registry.经腋动脉入路与经颈动脉入路行 TAVR 的比较:来自法国多中心注册研究的倾向性匹配比较。
EuroIntervention. 2020 Nov 20;16(10):842-849. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00117.
10
Transapical aortic valve replacement versus surgical aortic valve replacement: A subgroup analyses for at-risk populations.经心尖主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术:针对高危人群的亚组分析。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Dec;162(6):1701-1709.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.02.078. Epub 2020 Feb 29.