Hsu Chien-Chin, Lin Pei-Chen, Chen Kuo-Tai
Emergency Department, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan 710, Taiwan.
Department of Biotechnology, Southern Tainan University of Technology, Tainan 71005, Taiwan.
J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 21;11(14):4223. doi: 10.3390/jcm11144223.
This study investigated the association between the presence of bacteremia and increase in the requirement for intensive care in adult patients with urinary tract infection (UTI). The study also analyzed the differences in clinical features between patients with versus without bacteremia.
We conducted a retrospective screening of the medical records of adult patients admitted during a 4-month period at a single medical center. We excluded patients with concomitant infections and patients whose urine and blood samples were not collected in the emergency department (ED). The included patients were allocated to two groups-bacteremia and nonbacteremia groups-according to the blood culture results for samples collected in the ED.
The study cohort comprised 637 patients, including 158 (24.8%) patients in the bacteremia group and 479 (75.2%) patients in the nonbacteremia group. Compared with the patients in the nonbacteremia group, those in the bacteremia group satisfied more systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria; they had a higher white cell count, C-reactive protein level, and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores; and had a greater requirement for intensive care (bacteremia vs. nonbacteremia; SIRS: 79.1% vs. 49.9%, = 0.000; leukocytosis: 68.2% vs. 57.6%, = 0.000; elevation of CRP: 96.2% vs. 78.6%, = 0.000; SOFA: 39.2% vs. 23.2%, = 0.000; requirement for intensive care: 13.9% vs. 4.4%, = 0.000, respectively). According to the results of multivariate logistic regression, bacteremia and sepsis were independent factors associated with the requirement for intensive care.
Bacteremia increased the requirement for intensive care in patients with UTI. Physicians can identify bacteremia using inflammatory markers, the SIRS criteria, and SOFA scores.
本研究调查了成年尿路感染(UTI)患者菌血症的存在与重症监护需求增加之间的关联。该研究还分析了有菌血症和无菌血症患者临床特征的差异。
我们对一家单一医疗中心在4个月期间收治的成年患者的病历进行了回顾性筛查。我们排除了合并感染的患者以及在急诊科(ED)未采集尿液和血液样本的患者。根据在ED采集的样本的血培养结果,将纳入的患者分为两组——菌血症组和无菌血症组。
研究队列包括637例患者,其中菌血症组158例(24.8%),无菌血症组479例(75.2%)。与无菌血症组患者相比,菌血症组患者满足更多全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)标准;他们的白细胞计数、C反应蛋白水平和序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分更高;对重症监护的需求更大(菌血症组与无菌血症组;SIRS:79.1%对49.9%,P = 0.000;白细胞增多增多:68.2%对57.6%,P = 0.000;CRP升高:96.2%对78.6%,P = 0.000;SOFA:39.2%对23.2%,P = 0.000;重症监护需求:13.9%对4.4%,P = 0.000)。根据多因素逻辑回归结果,菌血症和脓毒症是与重症监护需求相关的独立因素。
菌血症增加了UTI患者对重症监护的需求。医生可以使用炎症标志物、SIRS标准和SOFA评分来识别菌血症。