Guo Xianshan, Guo Shizhe, Zhang Hongmei, Li Zhen
Department of Endocrinology, Xinxiang Central Hospital/The Fourth Clinical College of Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang 453000, China.
Department of Endocrinology, Yangpu Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, No. 450 Tengyue Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai 200090, China.
J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 22;11(15):4257. doi: 10.3390/jcm11154257.
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic disease characterized by hyperglycemia, insulin resistance, and pancreatic B cell dysfunction. Hyperglycemia can cause several complications, including nephrological, neurological, ophthalmological, and vascular complications. Many modalities, such as medication, physical therapies, and exercise, are developed against vascular disorders. Among all exercise forms, aerobic plus machine-assisted resistance training is widely applied. However, whether this intervention can significantly improve vascular conditions remains controversial. In this study, an electronic search was processed for the Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane libraries for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of aerobic plus machine-assisted resistance training with no exercise (control) on patients with T2DM. Pulse wave velocity (PWV), the index of arterial stiffness, was chosen as primary outcome. The reliability of the pooled outcome was tested by trial sequential analysis (TSA). Secondary outcomes included systolic blood pressure (SBP) and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Finally, five RCTs with a total of 328 patients were included. Compared with control, aerobic plus machine-assisted resistance training failed to provide significant improvement on PWV (MD -0.54 m/s, 95% CI [-1.69, 0.60], = 0.35). On the other hand, TSA indicated that this results till needs more verifications. Additionally, this training protocol did not significantly decrease SBP (MD -1.05 mmHg, 95% CI [-3.71, 1.61], = 0.44), but significantly reduced the level of HbA1c (MD -0.55%, 95% CI [-0.88, -0.22], = 0.001). In conclusion, this meta-analysis failed to detect a direct benefit of aerobic plus machine-assisted resistance training on vascular condition in T2DM population. Yet the improvement in HbA1c implied a potential of this training method in mitigating vascular damage. More studies are needed to verify the benefit.
2型糖尿病(T2DM)是一种以高血糖、胰岛素抵抗和胰腺β细胞功能障碍为特征的慢性疾病。高血糖会引发多种并发症,包括肾脏、神经、眼科和血管并发症。针对血管疾病开发了许多治疗方法,如药物治疗、物理治疗和运动。在所有运动形式中,有氧加器械辅助抗阻训练被广泛应用。然而,这种干预是否能显著改善血管状况仍存在争议。在本研究中,对PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆进行了电子检索,以查找比较有氧加器械辅助抗阻训练与不运动(对照)对T2DM患者疗效的随机对照试验(RCT)。脉搏波速度(PWV)作为动脉僵硬度指标,被选为主要结局指标。采用序贯试验分析(TSA)检验合并结局的可靠性。次要结局指标包括收缩压(SBP)和糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)。最终,纳入了5项RCT,共328例患者。与对照组相比,有氧加器械辅助抗阻训练未能使PWV得到显著改善(MD -0.54 m/s,95%CI[-1.69, 0.60],P = 0.35)。另一方面,TSA表明该结果仍需更多验证。此外,该训练方案未显著降低SBP(MD -1.05 mmHg,95%CI[-3.71, 1.61],P = 0.44),但显著降低了HbA1c水平(MD -0.55%,95%CI[-0.88, -0.22],P = 0.001)。总之,这项荟萃分析未能发现有氧加器械辅助抗阻训练对T2DM人群血管状况有直接益处。然而,HbA1c的改善意味着这种训练方法在减轻血管损伤方面具有潜力。需要更多研究来验证其益处。