文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

免疫检查点抑制剂治疗复发或转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌后的每周紫杉醇和西妥昔单抗作为挽救化疗的有效性和安全性:一项多中心临床研究。

Effectiveness and safety of weekly paclitaxel and cetuximab as a salvage chemotherapy following immune checkpoint inhibitors for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A multicenter clinical study.

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.

Department of Head and Neck Surgery, National Hospital Organization, Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Jul 28;17(7):e0271907. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271907. eCollection 2022.


DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0271907
PMID:35901098
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9333293/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The benefit of sequential therapy after immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) has been recently reported. Furthermore, there is a growing interest in the impact of cetuximab (Cmab)-containing salvage chemotherapy (SCT) and the therapeutic efficacy and adverse events (AEs) of Cmab administration prior to ICI administration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 52 patients with R/M HNSCC treated with SCT (weekly paclitaxel [PTX], n = 7, or weekly PTX and Cmab [PC], n = 45). RESULTS: The objective response rate (ORR) and a disease control rate (DCR) was 53.3% and 91.1% in the PC group and 42.9% and 57.1% in the PTX group, respectively. There was a significant difference in the DCR between the PC and PTX groups (p = 0.0143). The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival were significantly better in the PC group than in the PTX group. On the other hand, the incidence of drug-induced interstitial pneumonia (DI-IP) in R/M HNSCC patients who received SCT was 21.2%. Patients in the PC group were divided according to whether they received Cmab (Group A) or did not receive Cmab (Group B) as palliative therapy prior to ICIs. Group B had a significantly better OS than Group A. Furthermore, our findings suggest that the incidence rate of DI-IP during SCT might be higher in Group B. CONCLUSION: Although PC following ICIs shows dramatic efficacy, careful monitoring of AEs, including DI-IP, is recommended.

摘要

目的:免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)治疗复发性或转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌(R/M HNSCC)后的序贯治疗的益处最近已有报道。此外,人们越来越关注西妥昔单抗(Cmab)含有的挽救化疗(SCT)以及ICI 治疗前 Cmab 给药的治疗效果和不良事件(AEs)的影响。

材料和方法:我们回顾性分析了 52 例接受 SCT(每周紫杉醇 [PTX],n=7,或每周 PTX 和 Cmab [PC],n=45)治疗的 R/M HNSCC 患者的病历。

结果:PC 组的客观缓解率(ORR)和疾病控制率(DCR)分别为 53.3%和 91.1%,PTX 组分别为 42.9%和 57.1%。PC 组和 PTX 组之间的 DCR 差异有统计学意义(p=0.0143)。PC 组的总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期明显长于 PTX 组。另一方面,接受 SCT 的 R/M HNSCC 患者发生药物诱导性间质性肺炎(DI-IP)的发生率为 21.2%。根据患者在接受 ICI 之前是否接受 Cmab(A 组)或接受 Cmab 作为姑息治疗(B 组),将 PC 组患者进行分组。B 组的 OS 明显优于 A 组。此外,我们的研究结果表明,B 组在 SCT 期间发生 DI-IP 的发生率可能更高。

结论:尽管 PC 联合 ICI 显示出显著的疗效,但建议密切监测包括 DI-IP 在内的 AE。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/454c/9333293/73df75ee5efb/pone.0271907.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/454c/9333293/44ac64a590c6/pone.0271907.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/454c/9333293/16750ae8a508/pone.0271907.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/454c/9333293/73df75ee5efb/pone.0271907.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/454c/9333293/44ac64a590c6/pone.0271907.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/454c/9333293/16750ae8a508/pone.0271907.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/454c/9333293/73df75ee5efb/pone.0271907.g003.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Effectiveness and safety of weekly paclitaxel and cetuximab as a salvage chemotherapy following immune checkpoint inhibitors for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A multicenter clinical study.

PLoS One. 2022

[2]
Clinical Outcomes of Cetuximab and Paclitaxel after Progression on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Medicina (Kaunas). 2021-10-23

[3]
Clinical impact of weekly paclitaxel plus cetuximab is comparable to the EXTREME regimen for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Int J Clin Oncol. 2021-7

[4]
Cetuximab combined with paclitaxel or paclitaxel alone for patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma progressing after EXTREME.

Cancer Med. 2021-6

[5]
Weekly Cetuximab and Paclitaxel for Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

In Vivo. 2020

[6]
A phase II trial of paclitaxel plus biweekly cetuximab for patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer previously treated with both platinum-based chemotherapy and anti-PD-1 antibody.

ESMO Open. 2024-6

[7]
Response to salvage chemotherapy after progression on immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Eur J Cancer. 2019-9-28

[8]
Efficacy of cetuximab-containing regimens in the treatment of recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer after progression to immune checkpoint inhibitors.

J Chin Med Assoc. 2022-6-1

[9]
Initial analysis of the synergy of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor and concurrent chemoradiotherapy treatment for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients.

Radiat Oncol. 2023-7-4

[10]
Efficacy of Chemotherapy After Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Discontinuation in Head and Neck Cancer.

Laryngoscope. 2024-1

引用本文的文献

[1]
Combined Positive Score and Cisplatin Sensitivity Are Prognostic Factors for Response to Nivolumab Therapy for Recurrent Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck.

Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2024-10-16

[2]
Correction: Effectiveness and safety of weekly paclitaxel and cetuximab as a salvage chemotherapy following immune checkpoint inhibitors for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a multicenter clinical study.

PLoS One. 2024-5-9

[3]
Survival impact of sequential chemotherapy following pembrolizumab for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Int J Clin Oncol. 2024-6

[4]
Chemotherapy following immune checkpoint inhibitors in recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: clinical effectiveness and influence of inflammatory and nutritional factors.

Discov Oncol. 2023-8-29

本文引用的文献

[1]
Impact of previous nivolumab treatment on the response to taxanes in patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Eur J Cancer. 2021-12

[2]
Drug-induced interstitial lung disease in recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck cancer patients treated with cetuximab and/or nivolumab.

Oral Oncol. 2021-2

[3]
Real-World, Long-Term Outcomes of Nivolumab Therapy for Recurrent or Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck and Impact of the Magnitude of Best Overall Response: A Retrospective Multicenter Study of 88 Patients.

Cancers (Basel). 2020-11-18

[4]
Safety and efficacy of cetuximab-containing chemotherapy after immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a single-center retrospective study.

Anticancer Drugs. 2021-1-1

[5]
Salvage Chemotherapy After Nivolumab for Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Carcinoma.

Anticancer Res. 2020-9

[6]
Prognostic Biomarkers of Salvage Chemotherapy Following Nivolumab Treatment for Recurrent and/or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Cancers (Basel). 2020-8-15

[7]
Role of programmed death-ligand 1 in predicting the treatment outcome of salvage chemotherapy after nivolumab in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Head Neck. 2020-11

[8]
Two-year follow-up of a randomized phase III clinical trial of nivolumab vs. the investigator's choice of therapy in the Asian population for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (CheckMate 141).

Head Neck. 2020-10

[9]
Relationship between immune-related adverse events and the long-term outcomes in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab.

Oral Oncol. 2020-2

[10]
Pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (KEYNOTE-048): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study.

Lancet. 2019-11-1

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索