Suppr超能文献

美国本科生和研究生中性窒息的频率、方法、强度和健康后果。

Frequency, Method, Intensity, and Health Sequelae of Sexual Choking Among U.S. Undergraduate and Graduate Students.

机构信息

Department of Applied Health Science, Indiana University School of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.

The Center for Sexual Health Promotion, Indiana University School of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA.

出版信息

Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Aug;51(6):3121-3139. doi: 10.1007/s10508-022-02347-y. Epub 2022 Jul 28.

Abstract

Although sexual choking is now prevalent, little is known about how people engage in choking in terms of frequency, intensity, method, or potential health sequelae. In a campus-representative survey of undergraduate and graduate students, we aimed to: (1) describe the prevalence of ever having choked/been choked as part of sex; (2) examine the characteristics of choking one's sexual partners (e.g., age at first experience, number of partners, frequency, intensity, method); (3) examine the characteristics of having been choked during sex; and (4) assess immediate responses of having been choked including the extent to which frequency and method (e.g., hand, ligature, limb) of having been choked predicts the range of responses endorsed by participants. A total of 4254 randomly sampled students (2668 undergraduate, 1576 graduate) completed a confidential online survey during Spring 2021. The mean age of first choking/being choked was about 19, with more undergraduates than graduate students reporting first choking/being choked in adolescence. Women and transgender/gender non-binary participants were significantly more likely to have been choked than men. Participants more often reported the use of hands compared to limbs or ligature. Common responses to being choked were pleasurable sensations/euphoria (81.7%), a head rush (43.8%), feeling like they could not breathe (43.0%), difficulty swallowing (38.9%), unable to speak (37.6%), and watery eyes (37.2%). About 15% had noticed neck bruising and 3% had lost consciousness from being choked. Greater frequency and intensity of being choked was associated with reports of more physical responses as was use of limb (arm, leg) or ligature.

摘要

虽然性窒息现在很普遍,但人们对其发生的频率、强度、方式或潜在的健康后果知之甚少。在一项针对本科生和研究生的校园代表性调查中,我们旨在:(1)描述作为性行为的一部分,人们曾经有过窒息/被窒息的经历的流行程度;(2)检查窒息性伴侣的特征(例如,第一次经历的年龄、伴侣数量、频率、强度、方法);(3)检查在性行为中被窒息的特征;(4)评估被窒息后的即时反应,包括被窒息的频率和方式(例如,手、束缚物、肢体)预测参与者所认可的反应范围的程度。共有 4254 名随机抽样的学生(2668 名本科生,1576 名研究生)在 2021 年春季完成了一份机密的在线调查。第一次窒息/被窒息的平均年龄约为 19 岁,报告青春期第一次窒息/被窒息的本科生多于研究生。女性和跨性别/非二元性别参与者比男性更有可能被窒息。参与者更常报告使用手,而不是肢体或束缚物。被窒息后的常见反应是愉悦感/欣快感(81.7%)、头晕(43.8%)、感觉无法呼吸(43.0%)、吞咽困难(38.9%)、无法说话(37.6%)和泪眼汪汪(37.2%)。约 15%的人注意到颈部瘀伤,3%的人因窒息而失去意识。被窒息的频率和强度越大,报告的身体反应就越多,使用肢体(手臂、腿部)或束缚物的情况也越多。

相似文献

1
Frequency, Method, Intensity, and Health Sequelae of Sexual Choking Among U.S. Undergraduate and Graduate Students.
Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Aug;51(6):3121-3139. doi: 10.1007/s10508-022-02347-y. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
2
Prevalence and characteristics of choking/strangulation during sex: Findings from a probability survey of undergraduate students.
J Am Coll Health. 2023 May-Jun;71(4):1059-1073. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2021.1920599. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
3
Diverse Sexual Behaviors in Undergraduate Students: Findings From a Campus Probability Survey.
J Sex Med. 2021 Jun;18(6):1024-1041. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.03.006. Epub 2021 May 19.
4
"It Was Scary, But Then It Was Kind of Exciting": Young Women's Experiences with Choking During Sex.
Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Feb;51(2):1103-1123. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-02049-x. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
5
Non-Fatal Strangulation/Choking During Sex and Its Associations with Mental Health: Findings from an Undergraduate Probability Survey.
J Sex Marital Ther. 2022;48(3):238-250. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2021.1985025. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
7
Pornography and Women's Experience of Mixed-Gender Sexual Choking/Strangulation: Eroticization Mediates, Perceived Similarity Moderates.
J Health Commun. 2022 Mar 4;27(3):173-182. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2022.2073406. Epub 2022 May 10.
8
Pornography Consumption and Sexual Choking: An Evaluation of Theoretical Mechanisms.
Health Commun. 2023 May;38(6):1099-1110. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2021.1991641. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
9
What Is Rough Sex, Who Does It, and Who Likes It? Findings from a Probability Sample of U.S. Undergraduate Students.
Arch Sex Behav. 2021 Apr;50(3):1183-1195. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-01917-w. Epub 2021 Feb 9.

引用本文的文献

3
Choking/Strangulation During Sex: Understanding and Negotiating "Safety" Among 18-35 Year Old Australians.
Arch Sex Behav. 2025 Feb;54(2):483-494. doi: 10.1007/s10508-025-03097-3. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
4
Sexual desire for non-normative sexual behaviors: differences between centennials and millennials considering sexual orientation.
Front Sociol. 2024 Dec 19;9:1509111. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1509111. eCollection 2024.
6
Prevalence of Sexual Strangulation/Choking Among Australian 18-35 Year-Olds.
Arch Sex Behav. 2025 Feb;54(2):465-480. doi: 10.1007/s10508-024-02937-y. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
7
#ChokeMeDaddy: A Content Analysis of Memes Related to Choking/Strangulation During Sex.
Arch Sex Behav. 2023 Apr;52(3):1299-1315. doi: 10.1007/s10508-022-02502-5. Epub 2022 Dec 16.

本文引用的文献

2
"It Was Scary, But Then It Was Kind of Exciting": Young Women's Experiences with Choking During Sex.
Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Feb;51(2):1103-1123. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-02049-x. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
3
Sexual pleasure during college students' most recent partnered sexual experiences.
J Am Coll Health. 2023 Nov;71(8):2550-2561. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2021.1978461. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
4
How safe is BDSM? A literature review on fatal outcome in BDSM play.
Int J Legal Med. 2022 Jan;136(1):287-295. doi: 10.1007/s00414-021-02674-0. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
5
Childhood Sexual, Emotional, and Physical Abuse as Predictors of Dissociation in Adulthood.
J Child Sex Abus. 2021 Nov-Dec;30(8):953-976. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2021.1955789. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
6
Diverse Sexual Behaviors in Undergraduate Students: Findings From a Campus Probability Survey.
J Sex Med. 2021 Jun;18(6):1024-1041. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.03.006. Epub 2021 May 19.
8
Kinky Sex Gone Wrong: Legal Prosecutions Concerning Consent, Age Play, and Death via BDSM.
Arch Sex Behav. 2021 Apr;50(3):761-771. doi: 10.1007/s10508-020-01866-w. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
10
What Is Rough Sex, Who Does It, and Who Likes It? Findings from a Probability Sample of U.S. Undergraduate Students.
Arch Sex Behav. 2021 Apr;50(3):1183-1195. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-01917-w. Epub 2021 Feb 9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验