Suppr超能文献

急性重度溃疡性结肠炎的紧急结肠切除术:意大利结直肠外科学会(SICCR)的全国性调查研究技术策略。

Emergency colectomy for acute severe ulcerative colitis: a nationwide survey on technical strategies of the Italian society of colorectal surgery (SICCR).

机构信息

Department of Chirurgia Generale E Oncologica, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I, Largo Turati 62, 10100, Turin, Italy.

Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Science, "Università Degli Studi Della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.

出版信息

Updates Surg. 2022 Oct;74(5):1563-1569. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01339-w. Epub 2022 Jul 28.

Abstract

Emergency subtotal colectomy is the standard treatment for acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) unresponsive to medical treatment. No guidelines are available about surgical technique. The aim of the current survey was to identify the attitudes of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) surgeons concerning colectomy in patients with ASUC by means of a nationwide survey, with specific focus on intraoperative technical details. A survey was developed with focus on number of procedures performed, approach to vascular ligation, technique of bowel dissection, treatment of the omentum and of the rectal stump. Twenty Centres completed the survey. Seventy percent of responders started the colectomy laparoscopically. No significant differences were observed about vessels and mesocolic dissection as well as on the choice of the starting colon side and management of the omentum. Ileocolic vessels were ligated distally by 70% and at the origin by 30% and those who transect mesenteric vessels distally are significatively more likely to perform the dissection from lateral to medial and to cut the middle colic vessels distally and 100% of the ones linking left vessels at mesenteric axis transect middle colic vessels at the origin. No differences were observed in the treatment of rectal stump; however, all surgeons who performed a transrectal drainage (45%) left the rectal stump intraperitoneal (p < 0.05). No consensus exists about the technique of dissection, vascular ligation, treatment of the omentum and management of rectal stump. Further studies are needed to evaluate the impact of the different surgical techniques on patients' outcomes.

摘要

急诊次全结肠切除术是治疗药物治疗无效的急性重度溃疡性结肠炎(ASUC)的标准治疗方法。目前尚无关于手术技术的指南。本研究旨在通过全国性调查,确定炎症性肠病(IBD)外科医生对 ASUC 患者结肠切除术的态度,重点关注手术中的技术细节。该调查侧重于手术次数、血管结扎方法、肠切开技术、网膜处理和直肠残端处理。20 个中心完成了调查。70%的应答者以腹腔镜方式开始结肠切除术。在血管和肠系膜解剖以及起始结肠侧和网膜处理的选择方面,没有观察到显著差异。70%的人将回结肠血管远端结扎,30%的人在血管起源处结扎,那些远端横断肠系膜血管的人更有可能从外侧到内侧进行解剖,并远端横断中间结肠血管,并且 100%的在肠系膜轴处结扎左侧血管的人在起源处横断中间结肠血管。直肠残端的处理没有差异;然而,所有进行经直肠引流(45%)的外科医生都将直肠残端留在腹腔内(p<0.05)。在解剖、血管结扎、网膜处理和直肠残端管理方面,目前尚无共识。需要进一步研究来评估不同手术技术对患者结局的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验