• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在大型综合医疗体系中降低保乳手术后再次切除术率的经济影响。

Economic Impact of Reducing Reexcision Rates after Breast-Conserving Surgery in a Large, Integrated Health System.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, The Permanente Medical Group (TPMG), Oakland, CA, USA.

Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, East Highland Hospital, Oakland, CA, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Oct;29(10):6288-6296. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12127-6. Epub 2022 Jul 29.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-022-12127-6
PMID:35904654
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reexcision after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is costly for patients, but few studies have captured the economic burden to a healthcare system. We quantified operating room (OR) charges as well as OR time and then modeled expected savings of a reexcision reduction initiative.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort review of all breast cancer patients with BCS between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2020. Operating room charges of disposable supplies and implants as well as operative time were calculated.

RESULTS

During the 5-year period, the 8804 patients who underwent BCS, 1628 (18.5%) required reexcision. The reexcision cohort was younger (61 vs. 64 years, p < 0.001), more likely to have ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (23.7% vs. 15.2%, p < 0.001), and had larger tumors (T1+T2 73.2% vs. 83.1%, p < 0.001). Reexcision costs represented 39% of total costs, the cost per patient for surgery was fourfold higher for reexcision patients. Reexcision operations comprised 14% of total operating room (OR) time (1848 of 13,030 hours). The reexcision rate for 54 surgeons varied from 7.2-39.0% with 46% (n = 25) having a reexcision rate >20%. A model simulating reducing reexcision rates to 20% or below for all surgeons reduced the reexcision rate to 16.2% overall. Using per procedure data, the model predicted a decrease in reexcision operations by 18% (327 operations), OR costs by 14% ($287,534), and OR time by 11% (204 hours).

CONCLUSIONS

Reexcision after BCS represents 39% of direct OR costs and 14% of OR time in our healthcare system. Modest improvements in surgeon reexcision rates may lead to significant economic and OR time savings.

摘要

背景

保乳手术后(BCS)的再次切除术对患者来说代价高昂,但很少有研究能够捕捉到这对医疗保健系统的经济负担。我们量化了手术室(OR)费用以及 OR 时间,然后对减少再次切除术的举措的预期节省进行了建模。

方法

我们对 2016 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日期间接受 BCS 的所有乳腺癌患者进行了回顾性队列研究。计算了一次性用品和植入物的手术室费用以及手术时间。

结果

在 5 年期间,8804 名接受 BCS 的患者中有 1628 名(18.5%)需要再次切除术。再次切除术组更年轻(61 岁比 64 岁,p < 0.001),更有可能患有导管原位癌(DCIS)(23.7%比 15.2%,p < 0.001),并且肿瘤更大(T1+T2 73.2%比 83.1%,p < 0.001)。再次切除术的费用占总费用的 39%,再次切除术患者的手术费用是其他患者的四倍。再次切除术手术占总手术室(OR)时间的 14%(1848 小时中的 13030 小时)。54 名外科医生的再次切除术率从 7.2%到 39.0%不等,其中 46%(n = 25)的再次切除术率> 20%。模拟将所有外科医生的再次切除术率降低到 20%或以下的模型将整体再次切除术率降低到 16.2%。使用每例手术的数据,该模型预测再次切除术减少 18%(327 例),手术室费用减少 14%(287534 美元),手术室时间减少 11%(204 小时)。

结论

BCS 后的再次切除术占我们医疗保健系统直接 OR 成本的 39%和 OR 时间的 14%。外科医生再次切除术率的适度提高可能会带来显著的经济和手术室时间节省。

相似文献

1
Economic Impact of Reducing Reexcision Rates after Breast-Conserving Surgery in a Large, Integrated Health System.在大型综合医疗体系中降低保乳手术后再次切除术率的经济影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Oct;29(10):6288-6296. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12127-6. Epub 2022 Jul 29.
2
Predictors of Reexcision following Breast-Conserving Surgery for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.保乳手术治疗导管原位癌的再次切除术预测因素。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Mar;28(3):1390-1397. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09101-5. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
3
Reoperation Rates in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ vs Invasive Breast Cancer After Wire-Guided Breast-Conserving Surgery.导线引导下保乳手术后导管原位癌与浸润性乳腺癌的再次手术率
JAMA Surg. 2017 Apr 1;152(4):378-384. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4751.
4
The effect of multiple reexcisions on the risk of local recurrence after breast conserving surgery.保乳手术后多次再次切除对局部复发风险的影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Nov;14(11):3133-40. doi: 10.1245/s10434-007-9523-4. Epub 2007 Jul 26.
5
Early Adoption of the SSO-ASTRO Consensus Guidelines on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery with Whole-Breast Irradiation in Stage I and II Invasive Breast Cancer: Initial Experience from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.早期采用美国放射肿瘤学会(ASTRO)关于Ⅰ期和Ⅱ期浸润性乳腺癌保乳手术切缘及全乳照射的共识指南:纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心的初步经验
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Oct;23(10):3239-46. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5397-7. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
6
Do Patients After Reexcision Due to Involved or Close Margins Have the Same Risk of Local Recurrence as Those After One-Step Breast-Conserving Surgery?因切缘阳性或切缘接近而接受再次切除的患者与接受一期保乳手术的患者发生局部复发的风险相同吗?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Jun;23(6):1831-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-5067-1. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
7
Implications of New Lumpectomy Margin Guidelines for Breast-Conserving Surgery: Changes in Reexcision Rates and Predicted Rates of Residual Tumor.新的保乳手术切缘指南对保乳手术的影响:再次切除率及残余肿瘤预测率的变化
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Mar;23(3):729-34. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4916-2. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
8
Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast with close or focally involved margins following breast-conserving surgery: treatment with reexcision or radiotherapy with increased dosage.保乳手术后切缘接近或局灶受累的乳腺导管原位癌:再次切除或增加剂量放疗的治疗方法
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Nov 15;75(4):1021-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.12.014. Epub 2009 Apr 20.
9
Predictors of Residual Tumor in Breast-Conserving Therapy.保乳治疗中残留肿瘤的预测因素
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Dec;22 Suppl 3:S451-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4736-4. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
10
Surgeon Variability and Factors Predicting for Reoperation Following Breast-Conserving Surgery.外科医生的变异性和预测保乳手术后再次手术的因素。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Sep;25(9):2573-2578. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6526-2. Epub 2018 May 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Insurer and patient costs for repeat breast surgery after initial lumpectomy for breast cancer.乳腺癌初次肿块切除术后再次乳房手术的保险公司和患者费用。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Jun 3. doi: 10.1007/s10549-025-07735-1.
2
GLUT1 as a generic biomarker enables near-infrared fluorescence molecular imaging guided precise intraoperative tumor detection in breast cancer.葡萄糖转运蛋白1(GLUT1)作为一种通用生物标志物,能够实现近红外荧光分子成像引导下的乳腺癌术中肿瘤精准检测。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2025 May;52(6):2171-2186. doi: 10.1007/s00259-025-07095-4. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
3
Direct and Indirect Costs of Breast Cancer and Associated Implications: A Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementation of Intraoperative Ultrasound Localization for Breast-Conserving Surgery in a Large, Integrated Health Care System is Feasible and Effective.在大型综合医疗体系中实施术中超声定位保乳手术是可行且有效的。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Oct;28(10):5648-5656. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10454-8. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
2
Impact of SSO-ASTRO "No Ink on Tumor" Guidelines on Reexcision Rates among Older Breast Cancer Patients.SSO-ASTRO“肿瘤无墨记”指南对老年乳腺癌患者再次切除术率的影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Jul;28(7):3703-3713. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09370-0. Epub 2020 Nov 22.
3
Lowering Re-excision Rates After Breast-Conserving Surgery: Unraveling the Intersection Between Surgeon Case Volumes and Techniques.
乳腺癌的直接和间接成本及其相关影响:系统评价。
Adv Ther. 2024 Jul;41(7):2700-2722. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02893-y. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
4
Contemporary Analysis of Reexcision and Conversion to Mastectomy Rates and Associated Healthcare Costs for Women Undergoing Breast-Conserving Surgery.保乳手术后再次切除术和改行乳房切除术的比率及相关医疗保健费用的当代分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Jun;31(6):3649-3660. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-14902-z. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
5
Tissue Classification of Breast Cancer by Hyperspectral Unmixing.基于高光谱解混的乳腺癌组织分类
Cancers (Basel). 2023 May 9;15(10):2679. doi: 10.3390/cancers15102679.
6
23rd Annual Meeting of the American Society of Breast Surgeons: Back to In-Person Scientific Exploration.美国乳腺外科医生协会第23届年会:回归面对面科学探索。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Oct;29(10):6087-6089. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12263-z. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
降低保乳手术后的再次切除率:剖析外科医生手术量与技术之间的交叉点
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Feb;28(2):894-901. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08731-z. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
4
The Value of Repeated Breast Surgery as a Quality Indicator in Breast Cancer Care.重复乳房手术作为乳腺癌护理质量指标的价值
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Jan;28(1):340-352. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08704-2. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
5
A 10-Year Analysis of 3693 Craniotomies during a Transition to Multidisciplinary Teams, Protocols, and Pathways.向多学科团队、方案和路径转变期间3693例开颅手术的10年分析
Perm J. 2019;23. doi: 10.7812/TPP/18.209. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
6
The Impact of Margin Status on Breast Conservation Rates.切缘状态对保乳率的影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Nov;26(12):3931-3938. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07641-z. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
7
Implementation of a Post-mastectomy Home Recovery Program in a Large, Integrated Health Care Delivery System.在大型综合医疗服务系统中实施乳腺癌术后家庭康复计划。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Oct;26(10):3178-3184. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07551-0. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
8
A Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes After Breast-Conserving Surgery and Mastectomy with Implant Breast Reconstruction.保乳手术与乳房切除术联合假体乳房重建术后患者报告结局的比较。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Oct;26(10):3133-3140. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07548-9. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
9
Factors Associated with Reoperation in Breast-Conserving Surgery for Cancer: A Prospective Study of American Society of Breast Surgeon Members.保乳手术治疗癌症后再次手术的相关因素:美国乳腺外科学会成员的前瞻性研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Oct;26(10):3321-3336. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07547-w. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
10
Resection of Cavity Shave Margins in Stage 0-III Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Breast Conserving Surgery: A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.保乳手术治疗 0-III 期乳腺癌患者行肿瘤腔镜下边缘切除术:一项前瞻性多中心随机对照试验
Ann Surg. 2021 May 1;273(5):876-881. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003449.