From the Reade Rheumatology.
Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
J Clin Rheumatol. 2022 Dec 1;28(8):397-401. doi: 10.1097/RHU.0000000000001883. Epub 2022 Jul 30.
Patients with rheumatoid arthritis require frequent consultations to monitor disease activity and intensify medication when treatment targets are not met. However, because most patients are in remission during follow-up, it should be possible to reduce the number of consultations for them. Electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) could be used to identify patients who meet their treatment goal and who could therefore be eligible to skip their visit.
The aim of this study was to assess the probability that patients with low disease activity scores on their ePROs do not need a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) or steroid intensification in the first 2 weeks after completion of the ePROs.
This medical-records review study compared results of ePROs answered during routine care with DMARD or steroid intensifications collected from anonymized electronic medical record at Reade. The primary outcome was the positive predictive value (PPV) of having a low disease activity score on an ePRO for not receiving a DMARD or steroid intensifications within 2 weeks. The 3 studied ePROs (and respective low disease activity outcome) were the Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) (score <2), Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) (yes), and the flare question (no). The secondary aim of the study was to assess which combination of ePROs resulted in the best PPV for DMARD or steroid intensifications.
Of the 400 randomly selected records, ultimately 321 were included (302 unique patients). The PPV of a RAPID3 <2, being in PASS, and a negative answer on the flare question were, respectively, 99%, 95%, and 83% to not receive a DMARD or steroid intensification within 2 weeks. The combination of a RAPID3 <2 and a negative flare question resulted in a PPV of 100%; this combination was present in 29% (93/321) of the total study population.
The RAPID3, PASS, and flare question have a high diagnostic accuracy to identify individuals who will not receive a DMARD or steroid intensification in the following 2 weeks. The combination of the RAPID3 and flare question yielded the best combination of diagnostic accuracy and highest percentage of patients who could be eligible to skip a visit. These results suggest that accurate identification of patients who meet their treatment goal with ePROs is possible.
类风湿关节炎患者需要频繁就诊,以监测疾病活动度,并在未达到治疗目标时加强药物治疗。然而,由于大多数患者在随访期间处于缓解期,因此应该可以减少他们的就诊次数。电子患者报告结局(ePROs)可用于识别达到治疗目标的患者,这些患者因此有资格跳过就诊。
本研究旨在评估 ePRO 低疾病活动评分的患者在完成 ePRO 后 2 周内无需进行疾病修饰抗风湿药物(DMARD)或类固醇强化治疗的可能性。
这项病历回顾研究比较了常规护理中 ePRO 结果与从 Reade 匿名电子病历中收集的 DMARD 或类固醇强化治疗结果。主要结局是 ePRO 低疾病活动评分对 2 周内不接受 DMARD 或类固醇强化治疗的阳性预测值(PPV)。研究中使用的 3 种 ePRO (以及各自的低疾病活动结果)分别为简化疾病活动指数 3 (RAPID3)(评分<2)、患者可接受的症状状态(PASS)(是)和病情加重问题(否)。该研究的次要目的是评估哪种 ePRO 组合对 DMARD 或类固醇强化治疗的 PPV 最佳。
在随机选择的 400 份记录中,最终纳入 321 份(302 名患者)。RAPID3<2、PASS 和病情加重问题回答否的 PPV 分别为 99%、95%和 83%,表示在 2 周内不会接受 DMARD 或类固醇强化治疗。RAPID3<2 和病情加重问题回答否的组合的 PPV 为 100%;在总研究人群中,这种组合占 29%(93/321)。
RAPID3、PASS 和病情加重问题对识别在接下来的 2 周内不会接受 DMARD 或类固醇强化治疗的个体具有较高的诊断准确性。RAPID3 和病情加重问题的组合具有最佳的诊断准确性和可跳过就诊的患者比例。这些结果表明,使用 ePRO 准确识别达到治疗目标的患者是可行的。