Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-15 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Division of Anesthesiology, National Organization Osaka National Hospital, 2-1-14 Hoenzaka, Chuo-ku, Osaka, 540-0006, Japan.
J Artif Organs. 2023 Jun;26(2):160-164. doi: 10.1007/s10047-022-01349-w. Epub 2022 Jul 30.
Oscillatory blood pressure (OBP) with a slow cuff-deflation system has been proposed as noninvasive measurement of mean arterial pressure (MAP) in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). However, the challenge is that the measurement is not obtainable in certain patients. We hypothesized that the combined use of color Doppler imaging during OBP measurement (CDBP) could derive MAP accurately. We conducted a prospective observational study in critically ill patients (30 patients with continuous-flow LVADs and 30 control patients without LVADs). Triplicate OBP and CDBP measurements were performed and invasive blood pressure (IBP) was recorded. The overall success rate of OBP was 63.3% in the LVAD group and 98.9% in the control group. The CDBP was successfully obtained in 100% of all study patients. The CDBP in the LVAD group was closest to the MAP of measured IBP, while that in the control group was closest to the systolic IBP. The mean absolute differences in OBP and CDBP from the closest IBP were similar in both the control and LVAD groups. In nonpulsatile LVAD patients with a pulse pressure IBP < 10 mmHg, the success rate of OBP measurement was only 10.0%, and CDBP showed significantly reduced error in MAP measurement (mean absolute difference: OBP 23.2 ± 8.7 vs CDBP 5.2 ± 3.6 mmHg, p < 0.001). The validity of OBP measurement with a slow cuff-deflation system limited particularly in nonpulsatile LVAD patients. The concurrent use of color Doppler imaging is encouraged for more accurate measurement of MAP in patients with continuous-flow LVADs.
采用缓慢放气的袖带系统进行搏动血压(OBP)测量已被提议作为连续血流左心室辅助装置(LVAD)患者的平均动脉压(MAP)的无创测量方法。然而,挑战在于并非所有患者都能获得这种测量结果。我们假设在 OBP 测量过程中结合使用彩色多普勒成像(CDBP)可以准确地获得 MAP。我们对危重症患者(30 例连续血流 LVAD 患者和 30 例无 LVAD 对照患者)进行了前瞻性观察研究。进行了三次重复的 OBP 和 CDBP 测量,并记录了有创血压(IBP)。LVAD 组 OBP 的总成功率为 63.3%,对照组为 98.9%。所有研究患者均成功获得 CDBP。LVAD 组的 CDBP 与测量 IBP 的 MAP 最接近,而对照组的 CDBP 与收缩压 IBP 最接近。在 LVAD 组和对照组中,OBP 和 CDBP 与最接近的 IBP 的平均绝对差值相似。在脉压 IBP < 10 mmHg 的非搏动性 LVAD 患者中,OBP 测量的成功率仅为 10.0%,而 CDBP 显示 MAP 测量的误差明显降低(平均绝对差值:OBP 23.2 ± 8.7 与 CDBP 5.2 ± 3.6 mmHg,p < 0.001)。缓慢放气袖带系统的 OBP 测量的有效性在非搏动性 LVAD 患者中受到特别限制。鼓励在连续血流 LVAD 患者中同时使用彩色多普勒成像,以更准确地测量 MAP。