Lu Shun, Wu Lin, Jian Hong, Chen Ying, Wang Qiming, Fang Jian, Wang Ziping, Hu Yanping, Sun Meili, Han Liang, Miao Liyun, Ding Cuimin, Cui Jiuwei, Li Baolan, Pan Yueyin, Li Xingya, Ye Feng, Liu Anwen, Wang Ke, Cang Shundong, Zhou Hui, Sun Xing, Ferry David, Lin Yong, Wang Shuyan, Zhang Wen, Zhang Chengli
Department of Medical Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Department of Thoracic Medical Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital and the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Lancet Oncol. 2022 Sep;23(9):1167-1179. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00382-5. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
VEGF inhibitors can enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy. However, despite high initial response rates, almost all patients eventually develop treatment resistance to EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sintilimab with or without IBI305 plus pemetrexed and cisplatin, compared with pemetrexed and cisplatin alone, for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had disease progression after receiving EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitor therapy.
This randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3 trial was conducted at 52 hospitals in China. Eligible participants were adults aged 18-75 years with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC and EGFR who progressed after receiving a EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitor, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 with at least one measurable lesion, and an estimated life expectancy of at least 3 months. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive sintilimab (200 mg) plus IBI305 (15 mg/kg) plus pemetrexed (500 mg/m) and cisplatin (75 mg/m), sintilimab plus pemetrexed and cisplatin, or pemetrexed and cisplatin (chemotherapy alone) using block randomisation with stratification according to sex and presence or absence of brain metastases. All study drugs were administered intravenously on day 1 of each cycle, once every 3 weeks. Except for cisplatin, which was only given in the first four cycles, treatment was given for 24 months or until disease progression, intolerable toxic effects, withdrawal of consent, death, or other protocol-specified conditions, whichever occurred first. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. We herein report the first planned interim analysis, with progression-free survival results for the comparison between sintilimab plus IBI305 plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone. The progression-free survival results for the sintilimab plus pemetrexed and cisplatin group are immature and not reported here. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03802240 (recruiting).
Between July 11, 2019, and July 31, 2021, 936 patients were screened and 444 were randomly assigned (148 to the sintilimab plus IBI305 plus chemotherapy group, 145 to the sintilimab plus chemotherapy group, and 151 to the chemotherapy alone group). Data cutoff for this interim analysis was July 31, 2021. After a median follow-up of 9·8 months (IQR 4·4-13·3), progression-free survival was significantly longer in the sintilimab plus IBI305 plus chemotherapy group versus the chemotherapy alone group (median 6·9 months [95% CI 6·0-9.3] vs 4·3 months [4·1-5·4]; hazard ratio 0·46 [0·34-0·64]; p<0·0001). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were decreased neutrophil count (30 [20%] in the sintilimab plus IBI305 plus chemotherapy group vs 26 [18%] in the sintilimab plus chemotherapy group vs 27 [18%] in the chemotherapy alone group), decreased white blood cell count (17 [11%] vs 12 [8%] vs 13 [9%]), and anaemia (18 [12%] vs ten [7%] vs 15 [10%]). Potentially treatment-related deaths occurred in six patients (intestinal obstruction, gastrointestinal haemorrhage, and myelosuppression in one patient each, and three deaths of unknown cause) in the sintilimab plus IBI305 plus chemotherapy group, and in one patient in the chemotherapy alone group (unknown cause).
In this interim analysis, sintilimab plus IBI305 plus cisplatin and pemetrexed was generally efficacious and well tolerated in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC who progressed after receiving EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitor therapy.
Innovent Biologics and the National Natural Science Foundation of China.
For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)抑制剂可增强免疫疗法的疗效。然而,尽管初始缓解率较高,但几乎所有患者最终都会对表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)酪氨酸激酶抑制剂产生耐药性。我们旨在评估信迪利单抗联合或不联合IBI305加培美曲塞和顺铂,与单纯培美曲塞和顺铂相比,用于治疗接受EGFR酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗后病情进展的局部晚期或转移性EGFR突变非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的疗效和安全性。
这项随机、双盲、多中心3期试验在中国52家医院进行。符合条件的参与者为年龄在18至75岁之间、患有局部晚期或转移性NSCLC且EGFR在接受EGFR酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗后病情进展、东部肿瘤协作组体能状态为0或1且至少有一个可测量病灶、预期寿命至少3个月的成年人。参与者被随机分配(1:1:1)接受信迪利单抗(200mg)联合IBI305(15mg/kg)加培美曲塞(500mg/m²)和顺铂(75mg/m²)、信迪利单抗加培美曲塞和顺铂,或培美曲塞和顺铂(单纯化疗),采用区组随机化,并根据性别和是否存在脑转移进行分层。所有研究药物在每个周期的第1天静脉给药,每3周一次。除顺铂仅在前四个周期给药外,治疗持续24个月或直至疾病进展、出现无法耐受的毒性作用、撤回同意、死亡或出现其他方案规定的情况,以先发生者为准。主要终点是意向性治疗人群的无进展生存期。我们在此报告首次计划的中期分析,即信迪利单抗联合IBI305加化疗与单纯化疗相比的无进展生存期结果。信迪利单抗加培美曲塞和顺铂组的无进展生存期结果尚不成熟,在此未报告。本研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,NCT03802240(正在招募)。
在2019年7月11日至2021年7月31日期间,共筛选了936例患者,444例被随机分配(148例至信迪利单抗联合IBI305加化疗组,145例至信迪利单抗加化疗组,151例至单纯化疗组)。本次中期分析的数据截止日期为2021年7月31日。在中位随访9.8个月(四分位间距4.4 - 13.3个月)后,信迪利单抗联合IBI305加化疗组的无进展生存期显著长于单纯化疗组(中位6.9个月[95%置信区间6.0 - 9.3]对4.3个月[4.1 - 5.4];风险比0.46[0.34 - 0.64];p<0.0001)。最常见的3级或4级治疗相关不良事件为中性粒细胞计数减少(信迪利单抗联合IBI305加化疗组30例[20%],信迪利单抗加化疗组26例[18%],单纯化疗组27例[18%])、白细胞计数减少(17例[11%]对12例[8%]对13例[9%])和贫血(18例[12%]对10例[7%]对15例[10%])。信迪利单抗联合IBI305加化疗组有6例患者发生可能与治疗相关的死亡(各有1例肠梗阻、胃肠道出血和骨髓抑制,3例死因不明),单纯化疗组有1例患者死亡(死因不明)。
在本次中期分析中,信迪利单抗联合IBI305加顺铂和培美曲塞对于接受EGFR酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗后病情进展的EGFR突变NSCLC患者总体有效且耐受性良好。
信达生物制药和中国国家自然科学基金。
中文翻译摘要见补充材料部分。