School of Optometry & Vision Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Clin Exp Optom. 2023 Mar;106(2):158-164. doi: 10.1080/08164622.2022.2102410. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
Efforts to provide accessible eye care must consider the extent to which travel-distance may be a barrier for some communities.
This study aimed to determine the distribution of - and geographic access to - eye health services in Aotearoa New Zealand. We further sought to identify communities who might benefit from provision of eye health services that were more geographically accessible.
We obtained addresses of optometry and ophthalmology clinics from regulatory bodies and augmented this with online searches. Address locators were created using a Land Information dataset and geocoded using ArcGIS 10.6. A national population was derived using Statistics New Zealand's Integrated Data Infrastructure. We generated population-weighted centroids of each of New Zealand's 50,938 meshblocks and calculated the travel distance along the road network between each clinic and population (meshblock centroid). The proportion of the population living >50 km from each clinic type was calculated; as was the median, inter-quartile range and maximum distance across area-level deprivation quintiles in each district.
A national population of 4.88 million was identified, as were addresses for 344 optometry, 46 public ophthalmology and 90 private ophthalmology clinics. Nationally and within each district, travel distance to optometry was shorter than to either type of ophthalmology clinic. The region of Northland - with a high proportion of the population Māori and in the highest quintile of area-level deprivation - had the furthest average distance to travel to optometry and public ophthalmology, while the West Coast region on the South Island had the farthest to travel to private ophthalmology. Several communities were identified where longer distances intersected with higher area-level deprivation.
Most New Zealanders live within 10 km of eye health services. However, to achieve equitable eye health, strategies are required that make affordable eye health services accessible to communities for whom large travel distances intersect with high deprivation.
提供可及性眼保健的努力必须考虑到对于某些社区而言,旅行距离可能成为障碍的程度。
本研究旨在确定新西兰眼健康服务的分布情况和地理可及性,并进一步确定可能受益于提供更具地理可及性的眼健康服务的社区。
我们从监管机构获得了验光和眼科诊所的地址,并通过在线搜索对其进行了补充。使用土地信息数据集创建了地址定位器,并使用 ArcGIS 10.6 对其进行了地理编码。使用新西兰统计局的综合数据基础设施获得了全国人口。我们为新西兰的 50938 个网格块中的每一个生成了人口加权质心,并计算了每个诊所与人口(网格块质心)之间沿路网的旅行距离。计算了每种诊所类型的人口中距离诊所超过 50 公里的比例;还计算了每个地区的每个区域贫困五分位数内的中位数、四分位距和最大距离。
确定了 488 万的全国人口以及 344 家验光诊所、46 家公立眼科诊所和 90 家私立眼科诊所的地址。在全国范围内和每个地区内,前往验光诊所的旅行距离都短于前往任何一种眼科诊所的旅行距离。北地地区(人口中毛利人比例较高,且处于区域贫困五分位数的最高水平)前往验光和公立眼科的平均距离最远,而南岛西海岸地区前往私立眼科的距离最远。确定了一些社区,这些社区的距离较长,且与较高的区域贫困程度相交。
大多数新西兰人居住在距离眼保健服务 10 公里以内的地方。然而,为了实现公平的眼健康,需要制定策略,使负担得起的眼保健服务能够为那些距离较远且贫困程度较高的社区所获得。