Johnson Daniel T, Svanerud Johan, Ahn Jung-Min, Bezerra Hiram G, Collison Damien, van 't Veer Marcel, Hennigan Barry, De Bruyne Bernard, Kirkeeide Richard L, Gould K Lance, Johnson Nils P
Weatherhead PET Center, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth and Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Coroventis Research AB, Uppsala, Sweden.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2023 Jan;46:98-105. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2022.07.021. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Matching phasic pressure tracings between a fluid-filled catheter and high-fidelity pressure wire has received limited attention, although each part contributes half of the information to clinical decisions. We aimed to study the impact of a novel and automated method for improving the phasic calibration of a fluid-filled catheter by accounting for its oscillatory behavior.
METHODS/MATERIALS: Retrospective analysis of drift check tracings was performed using our algorithm that corrects for mean difference (offset), temporal delays (timing), differential sensitivity of the manifold transducer and pressure wire sensor (gain), and the oscillatory behavior of the fluid-filled catheter described by its resonant frequency and damping factor (how quickly oscillations disappear after a change in pressure).
Among 2886 cases, correcting for oscillations showed a large improvement in 28 % and a medium improvement in 41 % (decrease in root mean square error >0.5 mmHg to <1 or 1-2 mmHg, respectively). 96 % of oscillators were underdamped with median damping factor 0.27 and frequency 10.6 Hz. Fractional flow reserve or baseline Pd/Pa demonstrated no clinically important bias when ignoring oscillations. However, uncorrected subcycle non-hyperemic pressure ratios (NHPR) displayed both bias and scatter.
By automatically accounting for the oscillatory behavior of a fluid-filled catheter system, phasic matching against a high-fidelity pressure wire can be improved compared to standard equalization methods. The majority of tracings contain artifacts, mainly due to underdamped oscillations, and neglecting them leads to biased estimates of equalization parameters. No clinically important bias exists for whole-cycle metrics, in contrast to significant effects on subcycle NHPR.
背景/目的:尽管流体填充导管和高保真压力导丝的相位压力描记图对临床决策各贡献一半信息,但两者之间的匹配受到的关注有限。我们旨在研究一种新的自动化方法的影响,该方法通过考虑流体填充导管的振荡行为来改善其相位校准。
方法/材料:使用我们的算法对漂移检查描记图进行回顾性分析,该算法可校正平均差异(偏移)、时间延迟(定时)、歧管换能器和压力导丝传感器的差异灵敏度(增益),以及由其共振频率和阻尼因子描述的流体填充导管的振荡行为(压力变化后振荡消失的速度)。
在2886例病例中,校正振荡后,28%有显著改善,41%有中等改善(均方根误差分别从>0.5 mmHg降至<1 mmHg或1 - 2 mmHg)。96%的振荡器为欠阻尼,中位阻尼因子为0.27,频率为10.6 Hz。忽略振荡时,血流储备分数或基线Pd/Pa无临床重要偏差。然而,未校正的亚周期非充血压力比值(NHPR)存在偏差和离散。
与标准均衡方法相比,通过自动考虑流体填充导管系统的振荡行为,可改善与高保真压力导丝的相位匹配。大多数描记图包含伪影,主要是由于欠阻尼振荡,忽略它们会导致均衡参数的偏差估计。与对亚周期NHPR的显著影响相反,全周期指标不存在临床重要偏差。