Hepatic Surgery Center, Institute of HBP Surgery, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095, Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Guangdong Medical University, Guangdong, China.
Surg Endosc. 2022 Dec;36(12):8992-9000. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09351-2. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
At present, the choice of treatment modalities for ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma patients in BCLC stage A remains controversial, and this study compared the overall survival of ruptured HCC patients undergoing TACE or hepatectomy.
A total of 283 ruptured HCC patients treated at our liver surgery center were included in our study, of which 175 were treated with hepatectomy and 108 were treated with TACE. To reduce selection bias, we used a propensity score matching (PSM) model, which yielded a total of 88 pairs of patients. We used the Kaplan-Meier method to compare the long-term prognosis, and the Landmark method was used to compare the short-term and long-term prognoses of patients after PSM. Finally, we performed subgroup analysis according to whether it met the Milan criteria.
After PSM, in the hepatectomy group, the 1-, 3-, and 5 year OS rates were 73.4%, 45.4%, and 33.9%, respectively. In the TACE group, the 1-, 3-, and 5 year OS rates were 58.5%, 40.6%, and 23.2%, respectively. Within one year, the hepatectomy group had a better prognosis than the TACE group (P = 0.022), but there was no difference in long-term survival(P = 0.936). In the subgroup analysis, in patients who met the Milan criteria, the survival curve indicated that there was no statistically significant difference in the survival prognosis between the two groups (P = 0.294) HR = 1.56(0.68-3.59); in the patients beyond the Milan criteria, the survival time was 28.0 months (20.0-34.0) in patients who underwent hepatectomy and 18 months (9.8-26.2) in patients who underwent TACE, and the survival curve indicated a statistically significant difference (P = 0.043) HR = 1.57(1.01-2.43).
Our propensity score-matched study found that ruptured HCC patients treated by hepatectomy had a better short-term prognosis than those treated by TACE, but there was no difference in the long-term prognosis between the two treatment groups.
目前,BCLC 分期 A 期破裂肝细胞癌患者的治疗方式选择仍存在争议,本研究比较了接受 TACE 或肝切除术治疗的破裂 HCC 患者的总生存率。
共纳入 283 例在我院肝外科中心接受治疗的破裂 HCC 患者,其中 175 例行肝切除术,108 例行 TACE。为了减少选择偏倚,我们使用了倾向评分匹配(PSM)模型,共产生了 88 对患者。我们使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法比较了长期预后,并使用 Landmark 方法比较了 PSM 后患者的短期和长期预后。最后,我们根据是否符合米兰标准进行了亚组分析。
PSM 后,肝切除术组的 1、3、5 年 OS 率分别为 73.4%、45.4%和 33.9%。TACE 组的 1、3、5 年 OS 率分别为 58.5%、40.6%和 23.2%。在 1 年内,肝切除术组的预后优于 TACE 组(P=0.022),但长期生存无差异(P=0.936)。在亚组分析中,在符合米兰标准的患者中,生存曲线表明两组之间的生存预后无统计学差异(P=0.294)HR=1.56(0.68-3.59);在超出米兰标准的患者中,行肝切除术的患者中位生存时间为 28.0 个月(20.0-34.0),而行 TACE 的患者为 18 个月(9.8-26.2),生存曲线表明差异具有统计学意义(P=0.043)HR=1.57(1.01-2.43)。
我们的倾向评分匹配研究发现,接受肝切除术治疗的破裂 HCC 患者的短期预后优于接受 TACE 治疗的患者,但两组患者的长期预后无差异。