Suppr超能文献

用于治疗新冠肺炎住院患者的药物的采用与停用

Adoption and Deadoption of Medications to Treat Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19.

作者信息

Barbash Ian J, Davis Billie S, Minturn John S, Kahn Jeremy M

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.

Department of Critical Care Medicine, CRISMA Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.

出版信息

Crit Care Explor. 2022 Jun 30;4(7):e0727. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000727. eCollection 2022 Jul.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The COVID-19 pandemic was characterized by rapidly evolving evidence regarding the efficacy of different therapies, as well as rapidly evolving health policies in response to that evidence. Data on adoption and deadoption are essential as we learn from this pandemic and prepare for future public health emergencies.

DESIGN

We conducted an observational cohort study in which we determined patterns in the use of multiple medications to treat COVID-19: remdesivir, hydroxychloroquine, IV corticosteroids, tocilizumab, heparin-based anticoagulants, and ivermectin. We analyzed changes both overall and within subgroups of critically ill versus Noncritically ill patients.

SETTING

Data from Optum's deidentified Claims-Clinical Dataset, which contains multicenter electronic health record data from U.S. hospitals.

PATIENTS

Adults hospitalized with COVID-19 from January 2020 to June 2021.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Of 141,533 eligible patients, 34,515 (24.4%) required admission to an ICU, 14,754 (10.4%) required mechanical ventilation, and 18,998 (13.4%) died during their hospitalization. Averaged over the entire time period, corticosteroid use was most common (47.0%), followed by remdesivir (33.2%), anticoagulants (19.3%), hydroxychloroquine (7.3%), and tocilizumab (3.4%). Usage patterns varied substantially across treatments. For example, hydroxychloroquine use peaked in March 2020 and leveled off to near zero by June 2020, whereas the use of remdesivir, corticosteroids, and tocilizumab all increased following press releases announcing positive results of large international trials. Ivermectin use increased slightly over the study period but was extremely rare overall (0.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

During the COVID-19 pandemic, medication treatment patterns evolved reliably in response to emerging evidence and changes in policy. These findings may inform efforts to promote optimal adoption and deadoption of treatments for acute care conditions.

摘要

目的

2019冠状病毒病大流行的特点是,关于不同疗法疗效的证据迅速演变,以及针对该证据迅速演变的卫生政策。随着我们从这次大流行中吸取教训并为未来的突发公共卫生事件做好准备,采用和停用的数据至关重要。

设计

我们进行了一项观察性队列研究,确定了多种治疗2019冠状病毒病药物的使用模式:瑞德西韦、羟氯喹、静脉注射皮质类固醇、托珠单抗、肝素类抗凝剂和伊维菌素。我们分析了总体变化以及重症与非重症患者亚组内的变化。

背景

来自Optum的去识别化索赔临床数据集的数据,该数据集包含美国医院的多中心电子健康记录数据。

患者

2020年1月至2021年6月因2019冠状病毒病住院的成年人。

干预措施

无。

测量指标和主要结果

在141,533名符合条件的患者中,34,515名(24.4%)需要入住重症监护病房,14,754名(10.4%)需要机械通气,18,998名(13.4%)在住院期间死亡。在整个时间段内平均计算,皮质类固醇的使用最为常见(47.0%),其次是瑞德西韦(33.2%)、抗凝剂(19.3%)、羟氯喹(7.3%)和托珠单抗(3.4%)。不同治疗方法的使用模式差异很大。例如,羟氯喹的使用在2020年3月达到峰值,到2020年6月降至接近零,而在宣布大型国际试验阳性结果的新闻稿发布后,瑞德西韦、皮质类固醇和托珠单抗的使用均有所增加。伊维菌素的使用在研究期间略有增加,但总体极为罕见(0.4%)。

结论

在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,药物治疗模式根据新出现的证据和政策变化可靠地演变。这些发现可能为促进急性护理疾病治疗的最佳采用和停用提供参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3582/9333499/9d762b948236/cc9-4-e0727-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验