Saine M Elle, Schnellinger Erin M, Liu Michel, Diamond Joshua M, Crespo Maria M, Prenner Stacey, Potluri Vishnu, Bermudez Christian, Mentch Heather, Moore Michaella, Besharatian Behdad, Goldberg David S, Barg Frances K, Reese Peter P
Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Transplant Direct. 2022 Jul 19;8(8):e1341. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001341. eCollection 2022 Aug.
Historically, many organs from deceased donors with hepatitis C virus (HCV) were discarded. The advent of highly curative direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapies motivated transplant centers to conduct trials of transplanting HCV-viremic organs (nucleic acid amplification test positive) into HCV-negative recipients, followed by DAA treatment. However, the factors that influence candidates' decisions regarding acceptance of transplant with HCV-viremic organs are not well understood.
To explore patient-level perceptions, influences, and experiences that inform candidate decision-making regarding transplant with organs from HCV-viremic donors, we conducted a qualitative semistructured interview study embedded within 3 clinical trials investigating the safety and efficacy of transplanting lungs and kidneys from HCV-viremic donors into HCV-negative recipients. The study was conducted from June 2019 to March 2021.
Among 44 HCV-negative patients listed for organ transplant who were approached for enrollment in the applicable clinical trial, 3 approaches to decision-making emerged: positivist, risk analyses, and instinctual response. Perceptions of risk contributed to conceptualizations of factors influencing decisions. Moreover, most participants relied on multiple decision-making approaches, either simultaneously or sequentially.
Understanding how different decisional models influence patients' choices regarding transplant with organs from HCV-viremic donors may promote shared decision-making among transplant patients and providers.
在历史上,许多来自丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染的已故捐赠者的器官都被丢弃了。高治愈率的直接抗病毒药物(DAA)疗法的出现促使移植中心开展试验,将HCV病毒血症器官(核酸扩增检测呈阳性)移植到HCV阴性受者体内,随后进行DAA治疗。然而,影响候选者接受HCV病毒血症器官移植决策的因素尚未得到充分了解。
为了探究影响候选者接受HCV病毒血症捐赠者器官移植决策的患者层面的认知、影响因素和经历,我们在3项临床试验中开展了一项定性半结构式访谈研究,这些试验旨在调查将HCV病毒血症捐赠者的肺和肾移植到HCV阴性受者体内的安全性和有效性。该研究于2019年6月至2021年3月进行。
在44名登记等待器官移植的HCV阴性患者中,有3种决策方式出现:实证主义、风险分析和本能反应。对风险的认知促成了对影响决策因素的概念化。此外,大多数参与者同时或相继依赖多种决策方式。
了解不同的决策模型如何影响患者对HCV病毒血症捐赠者器官移植的选择,可能会促进移植患者和提供者之间的共同决策。