School of Chemistry and Biological Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, 100083, PR China.
School of Chemistry and Biological Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, 100083, PR China.
Anal Chim Acta. 2022 Aug 15;1221:340135. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2022.340135. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
In recent years, some studies have found that oriented immobilization of antibodies to microspheres can fully expose the antigen binding sites of antibodies, which can improve the sensitivity of sandwich immunoassays for the detection of proteins. Can this antibody immobilization strategy also improve the sensitivity of competitive immunoassays for the detection of small molecules? To answer this question, the conjugate MS-SPG-Ab (oriented immobilization of aflatoxin B1 antibody to time-resolved fluorescent microspheres via streptococcal protein G) and the conjugate MS-Ab (nonoriented immobilization of aflatoxin B1 antibody to time-resolved fluorescent microspheres) were prepared, and a lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) for the detection of aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) was established. The detection performance of the two methods was compared. The results showed that under the condition that the number of "effective" antibodies immobilized on TRF-MS was similar, compared with the nonoriented immobilization strategy (IC50 = 0.21 ng mL), the LFIA method established by the oriented immobilization strategy reduced the sensitivity of AFB1 detection (IC50 = 0.37 ng mL). However, this method can obtain higher detection precision for AFB1, the CV values were all below 8%. And it has stronger tolerance to the matrix of maize and peanut samples. The bias of LFIAs based on oriented immobilization technology (-14.93%-7.92%) was lower than nonoriented immobilization technology (28.16%-34.19%) for AFB1 detection in the two sample extracts. This study suggests that the LFIA method based on the oriented immobilization of antibodies can improve the accuracy of the detection results when performing rapid screening of small molecules.
近年来,一些研究发现,将抗体定向固定在微球上可以充分暴露抗体的抗原结合位点,从而提高用于检测蛋白质的夹心免疫分析的灵敏度。这种抗体固定化策略是否也能提高用于检测小分子的竞争免疫分析的灵敏度?为了回答这个问题,制备了缀合物 MS-SPG-Ab(通过链霉蛋白 G 将黄曲霉毒素 B1 抗体定向固定在时间分辨荧光微球上)和缀合物 MS-Ab(将黄曲霉毒素 B1 抗体非定向固定在时间分辨荧光微球上),并建立了用于检测黄曲霉毒素 B1(AFB1)的侧向流动免疫分析(LFIA)。比较了两种方法的检测性能。结果表明,在固定在 TRF-MS 上的“有效”抗体数量相似的情况下,与非定向固定化策略(IC50=0.21ng/mL)相比,定向固定化策略建立的 LFIA 方法降低了 AFB1 检测的灵敏度(IC50=0.37ng/mL)。然而,该方法可以获得更高的 AFB1 检测精度,CV 值均低于 8%。并且它对玉米和花生样品基质具有更强的容忍度。基于定向固定化技术的 LFIA(-14.93%-7.92%)对两种样品提取物中 AFB1 的检测偏差低于非定向固定化技术(28.16%-34.19%)。本研究表明,在进行小分子的快速筛选时,基于抗体定向固定化的 LFIA 方法可以提高检测结果的准确性。