Division of Cardiovascular Prevention and Wellness, Department of Cardiology Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center Houston TX.
Center for Outcomes Research Houston Methodist Houston TX.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Aug 16;11(16):e025737. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.025737. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
Background The value of coronary artery calcium (CAC) in the allocation of PCSK9i (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors) among individuals without clinically evident atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is unknown for indications that do not require confirmed familial hypercholesterolemia. We aimed to assess the ability of CAC to stratify ASCVD risk under 3 non-familial hypercholesterolemia PCSK9i allocation paradigms. Methods and Results We included participants without clinically evident ASCVD from MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis), CARDIA (Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults) study, DHS (Dallas Heart Study), and HNR (Heinz Nixdorf Recall) study. Three PCSK9i eligibility scenarios were defined: a broad scenario informed only by high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (N=567), a restrictive one combining higher low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and presence of ≥2 additional risk factors (N=127), and a high-risk scenario where individuals with subclinical organ damage or high estimated risk would be treated to achieve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <55 mg/dL (N=471). The high-risk scenario had the highest ASCVD event rates (27.8% at 10 years). CAC=0 was observed in 35% participants in the broad scenario, 25% in the restrictive scenario, and 16% in the high-risk scenario. In all, CAC=0 was associated with the lowest incident ASCVD rates at 5 and 10 years, and CAC burden was independently associated with ASCVD events adjusting for traditional risk factors. Conclusions CAC may be used to refine the allocation of PCSK9i, potentially leading to a more conservative use if CAC=0. The value of CAC testing is greater in scenarios that use low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and/or traditional risk factors to define PCSK9i eligibility (CAC=0 present in 1 of 3-4 patients), whereas its prevalence is lower when allocation is informed by presence of noncoronary subclinical organ damage.
在没有临床明显动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)的个体中,冠状动脉钙(CAC)在分配 PCSK9i(前蛋白转化酶枯草溶菌素/柯萨奇蛋白酶 9 抑制剂)方面的价值尚不清楚,这些个体的适应证不需要确诊的家族性高胆固醇血症。我们旨在评估 CAC 在 3 种非家族性高胆固醇血症 PCSK9i 分配模式下分层 ASCVD 风险的能力。
我们纳入了来自 MESA(动脉粥样硬化多民族研究)、CARDIA(年轻人冠状动脉风险发展研究)、DHS(达拉斯心脏研究)和 HNR(海因茨·尼克斯多夫回忆研究)的无临床明显 ASCVD 的参与者。定义了 3 种 PCSK9i 入选情况:一种仅根据低密 度脂蛋白胆固醇水平(N=567)的广泛情况,一种将更高的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平与存在≥2 种其他危险因素相结合的限制情况(N=127),以及一种将有亚临床器官损害或高估计风险的个体作为治疗目标以实现低密度脂蛋白胆固醇<55mg/dL(N=471)的高危情况。高危情况的 ASCVD 事件发生率最高(10 年时为 27.8%)。在广泛情况下,CAC=0 见于 35%的参与者,在限制情况下见于 25%的参与者,在高危情况下见于 16%的参与者。总体而言,在 5 年和 10 年时,CAC=0 与最低的 ASCVD 发生率相关,并且 CAC 负担与 ASCVD 事件独立相关,在调整传统危险因素后。
CAC 可用于改进 PCSK9i 的分配,可能会导致更保守的使用,如果 CAC=0。如果使用 LDL 胆固醇水平和/或传统危险因素来定义 PCSK9i 的入选资格(CAC=0 见于 1/3-4 例患者),则 CAC 检测的价值更大,而当分配由非冠状动脉亚临床器官损害决定时,其流行率则较低。