Hauer Karen E, Williams Pamela M, Byerley Julie S, Swails Jennifer L, Barone Michael A
K.E. Hauer is associate dean for competency assessment and professional standards and professor, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California; ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8812-4045 .
P.M. Williams is associate dean for student affairs and professor, Department of Family Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland.
Acad Med. 2023 Feb 1;98(2):162-170. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004920. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
The transition from medical school to residency in the United States consumes large amounts of time for students and educators in undergraduate and graduate medical education (UME, GME), and it is costly for both students and institutions. Attempts to improve the residency application and Match processes have been insufficient to counteract the very large number of applications to programs. To address these challenges, the Coalition for Physician Accountability charged the Undergraduate Medical Education to Graduate Medical Education Review Committee (UGRC) with crafting recommendations to improve the system for the UME-GME transition. To guide this work, the UGRC defined and sought stakeholder input on a "blue-skies" ideal state of this transition. The ideal state views the transition as a system to support a continuum of professional development and learning, thus serving learners, educators, and the public, and engendering trust among them. It also supports the well-being of learners and educators, promotes diversity, and minimizes bias. This manuscript uses polarity thinking to analyze 3 persistent key tensions in the system that require ongoing management. First, the formative purpose of assessment for learning and growth is at odds with the use of assessment data for ranking and sorting candidates. Second, the function of residents as learners can conflict with their role as workers contributing service to health care systems. Third, the current residency Match process can position the desire for individual choice-among students and their programs-against the workforce needs of the profession and the public. This Scholarly Perspective presents strategies to balance the upsides and downsides inherent to these tensions. By articulating the ideal state of the UME-GME transition and anticipating tensions, educators and educational organizations can be better positioned to implement UGRC recommendations to improve the transition system.
在美国,从医学院过渡到住院医师培训阶段,对于本科和研究生医学教育(本科医学教育、研究生医学教育)中的学生和教育工作者而言,会耗费大量时间,而且对学生和院校来说成本都很高。为改善住院医师申请和配对流程所做的努力,尚不足以应对大量的项目申请。为应对这些挑战,医师问责联盟责成本科医学教育到研究生医学教育审查委员会(UGRC)制定建议,以改进本科医学教育到研究生医学教育的过渡系统。为指导这项工作,UGRC界定了这一过渡的“理想状态”并征求了利益相关者的意见。理想状态将这种过渡视为一个支持专业发展和学习连续性的系统,从而服务于学习者、教育工作者和公众,并在他们之间建立信任。它还支持学习者和教育工作者的福祉,促进多样性,并尽量减少偏见。本文运用极性思维分析了该系统中3个持续存在的关键矛盾,这些矛盾需要持续管理。首先,为学习和成长而进行评估的形成性目的,与将评估数据用于对候选人进行排名和筛选相矛盾。其次,住院医师作为学习者的职能,可能与他们作为为医疗保健系统提供服务的工作者的角色相冲突。第三,当前的住院医师配对流程,可能使学生及其项目之间的个人选择愿望,与该专业和公众的劳动力需求相对立。这一学术观点提出了平衡这些矛盾所固有的利弊的策略。通过阐明本科医学教育到研究生医学教育过渡的理想状态并预测矛盾,教育工作者和教育组织能够更好地实施UGRC的建议,以改进过渡系统。