• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中线导管:退伍军人管理局医疗中心 3 年的经验。

Midline catheters: A 3-year experience at a veterans administration medical center.

机构信息

The Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI; Veterans Administration Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI.

Veterans Administration Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI.

出版信息

Am J Infect Control. 2023 May;51(5):563-566. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2022.08.002. Epub 2022 Aug 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajic.2022.08.002
PMID:35948122
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Midline catheters are recommended over peripherally inserted central catheters as short-term vascular access device for peripherally compatible infusates. We assessed the effectiveness and safety of midline catheters.

METHODS

Data from midline catheter placements from June 2016 to May 2019 at a tertiary-care Veterans Administration medical center were retrospectively collected. Patients were followed until catheter removal or death, whichever occurred first. The primary outcome was completion of intended therapy; secondary outcomes were catheter-related complications, including major (eg, catheter-related bloodstream infections [CRBSI] or venous thromboembolism [VTE]) and minor (eg, catheter occlusion, kinking, dislodgement) events.

RESULTS

Of 115 midlines, 62 (53.9%) were for antibiotic infusion and 49 (32.6%) for difficult access. The median dwell time was 11 days (interquartile range, 5.5-19.5 days). Midline catheters lasted through completion of therapy in 93 patients (80.9%). Catheter-related complications occurred in 27 patients (23.5%), including catheter dislodgement in 10 patients (8.7%), catheter kinking in 8 (7.0%), and catheter occlusion in 3 (2.6%). Only 1 patient experienced a major complication, a deep venous thrombosis (0.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Midlines appear to be effective and safe for short-term vascular access in patients requiring peripherally compatible infusates. While the rate of major complications is low, minor complications that necessitate device removal are common.

摘要

背景

中置导管作为短期血管通路装置,推荐用于外周相容输液,优于外周插入的中心导管。我们评估了中置导管的有效性和安全性。

方法

回顾性收集 2016 年 6 月至 2019 年 5 月在一家三级保健退伍军人事务部医疗中心进行的中置导管置管的数据。患者随访至导管拔除或死亡,以先发生者为准。主要结局为完成预期治疗;次要结局为导管相关并发症,包括主要(如导管相关性血流感染 [CRBSI]或静脉血栓栓塞 [VTE])和次要(如导管阻塞、扭结、移位)事件。

结果

在 115 根中置导管中,62 根(53.9%)用于输注抗生素,49 根(32.6%)用于难以置管。中位留置时间为 11 天(四分位距,5.5-19.5 天)。93 名患者(80.9%)的中置导管持续至治疗完成。27 名患者(23.5%)发生导管相关并发症,包括 10 名患者(8.7%)导管移位、8 名患者(7.0%)导管扭结和 3 名患者(2.6%)导管阻塞。只有 1 名患者发生严重并发症,即深静脉血栓形成(0.9%)。

结论

中置导管似乎可有效且安全地用于需要外周相容输液的患者的短期血管通路。虽然主要并发症发生率较低,但需要移除器械的次要并发症很常见。

相似文献

1
Midline catheters: A 3-year experience at a veterans administration medical center.中线导管:退伍军人管理局医疗中心 3 年的经验。
Am J Infect Control. 2023 May;51(5):563-566. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2022.08.002. Epub 2022 Aug 7.
2
Complications of Pediatric Midline Catheters: A Prospective Observational Pilot Study.儿科中线导管相关并发症:一项前瞻性观察性初步研究。
Anesth Analg. 2024 Mar 1;138(3):572-578. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006328. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
3
Safety and Outcomes of Midline Catheters vs Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters for Patients With Short-term Indications: A Multicenter Study.短期适应证患者中线导管与经外周置入中心静脉导管安全性和结局的多中心研究。
JAMA Intern Med. 2022 Jan 1;182(1):50-58. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.6844.
4
Occurrence and Risk Factors for Unplanned Catheter Removal in a PICU: Central Venous Catheters Versus Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheters.儿科重症监护病房中计划外导管移除的发生和危险因素:中心静脉导管与经外周置入的中心静脉导管。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020 Sep;21(9):e635-e642. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002426.
5
The Association of Vasopressor Administration through a Midline Catheter with Catheter-related Complications.中线导管给药与导管相关并发症的关联。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2023 Jul;20(7):1003-1011. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202209-814OC.
6
Midline peripheral catheters inserted in the superficial femoral vein at mid-thigh: Wise choice in COVID-19 acute hypoxemic respiratory failure patients with helmet continuous positive airway pressure.在大腿中部的股浅静脉插入中线外周导管:对于使用头盔持续气道正压通气的COVID-19急性低氧性呼吸衰竭患者而言是明智之选。
J Vasc Access. 2023 Nov;24(6):1469-1476. doi: 10.1177/11297298221085450. Epub 2022 May 2.
7
Peripherally inserted central catheters inserted with current best practices have low deep vein thrombosis and central line-associated bloodstream infection risk compared with centrally inserted central catheters: A contemporary meta-analysis.与中心静脉置管相比,按照当前最佳实践插入的外周静脉中心导管发生深静脉血栓形成和中心静脉导管相关血流感染的风险较低:一项当代荟萃分析。
J Vasc Access. 2021 Jan;22(1):9-25. doi: 10.1177/1129729820916113. Epub 2020 May 1.
8
Comparison of Complication Rates of Central Venous Catheters Versus Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheters in Pediatric Patients.比较儿科患者中心静脉导管与外周置入中心静脉导管的并发症发生率。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018 Dec;19(12):1097-1105. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001707.
9
Experience in the use of midclavicular catheters: An inception cohort study.经锁骨下静脉导管使用经验:一项起始队列研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2022 Aug;31(15-16):2296-2308. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16047. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
10
Comparison of outcomes from tunnelled femorally inserted central catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters: a propensity score-matched cohort study.经隧道股静脉插入中心导管与经外周静脉插入中心导管的结局比较:倾向评分匹配队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 17;14(5):e081749. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081749.

引用本文的文献

1
Midline catheter (10 cm) versus long peripheral intravenous catheter (6.4 cm): Randomized clinical trial protocol with economic analysis.中线导管(10厘米)与外周静脉长导管(6.4厘米):一项带有经济分析的随机临床试验方案
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 24;20(4):e0319587. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319587. eCollection 2025.
2
Midline vs Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter for Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy.门诊肠外抗菌治疗中使用中线导管与外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管的比较。
JAMA Intern Med. 2025 Jan 1;185(1):83-91. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.5984.
3
Usefulness of Midline Catheters versus Peripheral Venous Catheters in an Inpatient Unit: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.
住院病房中中线导管与外周静脉导管的效用:一项试点随机临床试验
Nurs Rep. 2022 Oct 31;12(4):814-823. doi: 10.3390/nursrep12040079.