Suppr超能文献

一项横断面研究,旨在评估印度南部一家综合医院精神科环境中约束的频率以及患者护理人员对约束的认知和态度。

A Cross-Sectional Study to Assess the Frequency of Restraint, and Knowledge and Attitudes of the Caregivers of Patients Toward Restraint in a General Hospital Psychiatry Setting from South India.

作者信息

Kuppili Pooja Patnaik, Vengadavaradan Ashvini, Bharadwaj Balaji

机构信息

Black Country Partnership Foundation NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom.

Dept. of Psychiatry, Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Dhanvanthri Nagar, Puducherry, India.

出版信息

Indian J Psychol Med. 2022 Jul;44(4):359-365. doi: 10.1177/02537176211061304. Epub 2022 Feb 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is limited Indian data on the epidemiology of hospital-based restraint practices and the knowledge and attitude of caregivers toward restraint. Therefore, this study aimed to report the frequency and pattern of restraints in a general hospital psychiatry setting and assess the knowledge and attitude about restraint practices among caregivers of patients.

METHODS

We calculated the frequency of restraints (physical and chemical) over one year. The knowledge and attitude toward restraint were assessed in 75 caregivers each of patients from inpatient and outpatient settings, using a questionnaire designed by the authors and pretested in a pilot study.

RESULTS

The frequency of any form of restraint was 19%. The frequency of chemical and physical restraints was 19% and 0.5%, respectively. Less than 20% of caregivers in both groups reported that restraint was either stigmatizing (5.33% inpatient caregivers vs. 12% outpatient caregivers), cruel (8% inpatient caregivers vs. 15.33% outpatient caregivers), or a measure of punishment (9% inpatient caregivers vs. 16% outpatient caregivers). No significant difference was found between knowledge and attitude about restraint between caregivers of outpatients and inpatients, except for a significantly greater number of caregivers of outpatients reporting that the restraint practices in the hospital were similar to those adopted by faith healers or religious/spiritual centers.

CONCLUSION

The frequency of either physical or chemical restraint was less compared to the existing international and Indian data. In addition, most caregivers of patients of both outpatients and inpatients did not report a negative attitude toward restraints.

摘要

背景

关于基于医院的约束措施的流行病学以及护理人员对约束的认知和态度,印度的数据有限。因此,本研究旨在报告综合医院精神科环境中约束措施的频率和模式,并评估患者护理人员对约束措施的认知和态度。

方法

我们计算了一年中约束措施(身体约束和药物约束)的频率。使用作者设计并在一项试点研究中进行预测试的问卷,对75名住院患者和门诊患者的护理人员进行了关于约束的认知和态度评估。

结果

任何形式的约束频率为19%。药物约束和身体约束的频率分别为19%和0.5%。两组中不到20%的护理人员报告称,约束措施带有污名化(住院患者护理人员为5.33%,门诊患者护理人员为12%)、残忍(住院患者护理人员为8%,门诊患者护理人员为15.33%)或惩罚手段(住院患者护理人员为9%,门诊患者护理人员为16%)。门诊患者和住院患者的护理人员在对约束的认知和态度方面没有显著差异,只是门诊患者的护理人员中,报告医院的约束措施与信仰治疗师或宗教/精神中心所采用的措施相似的人数明显更多。

结论

与现有的国际和印度数据相比,身体或药物约束的频率较低。此外,门诊患者和住院患者的大多数护理人员对约束措施均未表现出负面态度。

相似文献

2
Caregivers' Attitude and Perspective on Coercion and Restraint Practices on Psychiatric Inpatients from South India.
J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2019 Apr-Jun;10(2):261-266. doi: 10.4103/jnrp.jnrp_302_18.
3
Interventions for preventing and reducing the use of physical restraints of older people in general hospital settings.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 25;8(8):CD012476. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012476.pub2.
5
Restraint prevalence and perceived coercion among psychiatric inpatients from South India: A prospective study.
Asian J Psychiatr. 2018 Aug;36:10-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2018.05.024. Epub 2018 May 22.
6
The use of physical restraints- knowledge and attitude of nurses of a tertiary care institute, Uttarakhand, India.
J Educ Health Promot. 2020 Mar 31;9:77. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_451_19. eCollection 2020.
7
Knowledge, Practice, and Attitude of Nursing Home Staff Toward the Use of Physical Restraint: Have They Changed Over Time?
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2018 Sep;50(5):502-512. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12415. Epub 2018 Jul 29.
8
Interventions for preventing and reducing the use of physical restraints for older people in all long-term care settings.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 28;7(7):CD007546. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007546.pub3.
9
A systematic mapping review identifying key features of restraint research in inpatient pediatric psychiatry: A human rights perspective.
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2023 May-Jun;88:101894. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2023.101894. Epub 2023 May 25.
10
Indian nurses' Knowledge, Attitude and Practice towards use of physical restraints in psychiatric patients.
Invest Educ Enferm. 2018 Feb;36(1):e10. doi: 10.17533/udea.iee.v36n1e10.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Restraint guidelines for mental health services in India.
Indian J Psychiatry. 2019 Apr;61(Suppl 4):S698-S705. doi: 10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_106_19.
2
Caregivers' Attitude and Perspective on Coercion and Restraint Practices on Psychiatric Inpatients from South India.
J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2019 Apr-Jun;10(2):261-266. doi: 10.4103/jnrp.jnrp_302_18.
3
Mental Healthcare Act 2017: Liberal in Principles, Let Down in Provisions.
Indian J Psychol Med. 2018 Mar-Apr;40(2):101-107. doi: 10.4103/IJPSYM.IJPSYM_23_18.
4
Restraint prevalence and perceived coercion among psychiatric inpatients from South India: A prospective study.
Asian J Psychiatr. 2018 Aug;36:10-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2018.05.024. Epub 2018 May 22.
5
Knowledge and Attitude of Family Member of Mentally Ill Patient Regarding Restraint, 2016.
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2018 Apr;32(2):297-299. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2017.11.018. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
6
Rapid tranquillisation: a global perspective.
BJPsych Int. 2015 Nov 1;12(4):100-102. doi: 10.1192/s2056474000000684. eCollection 2015 Nov.
7
Staff and caregiver attitude to coercion in India.
Indian J Psychiatry. 2016 Dec;58(Suppl 2):S221-S229. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.196847.
8
Incidence Rate and Patterns of Physical Restraint Use Among Adult Patients in Malaysia.
Clin Nurs Res. 2018 Mar;27(3):278-295. doi: 10.1177/1054773816677807. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
9
Observational study of aggressive behaviour and coercion on an Indian acute ward.
Asian J Psychiatr. 2016 Aug;22:150-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2016.06.004. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
10
Involuntary Medication, Seclusion, and Restraint in German Psychiatric Hospitals after the Adoption of Legislation in 2013.
Front Psychiatry. 2015 Oct 28;6:153. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00153. eCollection 2015.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验