• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

智能静态和动态膝关节松弛度测量臂带

Smart Brace for Static and Dynamic Knee Laxity Measurement.

机构信息

Department of Information Engineering, University of Brescia, Via Branze 38, 25123 Brescia, Italy.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2022 Aug 4;22(15):5815. doi: 10.3390/s22155815.

DOI:10.3390/s22155815
PMID:35957372
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9371041/
Abstract

Every year in Europe more than 500 thousand injuries that involve the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) are diagnosed. The ACL is one of the main restraints within the human knee, focused on stabilizing the joint and controlling the relative movement between the tibia and femur under mechanical stress (i.e., laxity). Ligament laxity measurement is clinically valuable for diagnosing ACL injury and comparing possible outcomes of surgical procedures. In general, knee laxity assessment is manually performed and provides information to clinicians which is mainly subjective. Only recently quantitative assessment of knee laxity through instrumental approaches has been introduced and become a fundamental asset in clinical practice. However, the current solutions provide only partial information about either static or dynamic laxity. To support a multiparametric approach using a single device, an innovative smart knee brace for knee laxity evaluation was developed. Equipped with stretchable strain sensors and inertial measurement units (IMUs), the wearable system was designed to provide quantitative information concerning the drawer, Lachman, and pivot shift tests. We specifically characterized IMUs by using a reference sensor. Applying the Bland-Altman method, the limit of agreement was found to be less than 0.06 m/s for the accelerometer, 0.06 rad/s for the gyroscope and 0.08 μT for the magnetometer. By using an appropriate characterizing setup, the average gauge factor of the three strain sensors was 2.169. Finally, we realized a pilot study to compare the outcomes with a marker-based optoelectronic stereophotogrammetric system to verify the validity of the designed system. The preliminary findings for the capability of the system to discriminate possible ACL lesions are encouraging; in fact, the smart brace could be an effective support for an objective and quantitative diagnosis of ACL tear by supporting the simultaneous assessment of both rotational and translational laxity. To obtain reliable information about the real effectiveness of the system, further clinical validation is necessary.

摘要

每年在欧洲有超过 50 万例涉及前交叉韧带(ACL)的损伤被诊断出来。ACL 是人体膝关节的主要约束之一,专注于稳定关节并控制胫骨和股骨在机械应力下(即松弛)的相对运动。韧带松弛度的测量对于诊断 ACL 损伤和比较手术结果具有重要的临床价值。通常,膝关节松弛度评估是手动进行的,为临床医生提供的主要是主观信息。直到最近,通过仪器方法对膝关节松弛度的定量评估才被引入,并成为临床实践中的重要资产。然而,目前的解决方案仅提供了静态或动态松弛度的部分信息。为了支持使用单个设备进行多参数评估,开发了一种用于评估膝关节松弛度的创新型智能膝关节支具。这款可穿戴系统配备了可拉伸应变传感器和惯性测量单元(IMU),旨在提供有关抽屉试验、lachman 试验和枢轴转移试验的定量信息。我们特别使用参考传感器对 IMU 进行了特征描述。通过应用 Bland-Altman 方法,发现加速度计的协议界限小于 0.06 m/s,陀螺仪为 0.06 rad/s,磁力计为 0.08 μT。通过使用适当的特征化设置,三个应变传感器的平均应变系数为 2.169。最后,我们进行了一项初步研究,以使用基于标记的光电立体摄影测量系统比较结果,以验证设计系统的有效性。系统区分可能的 ACL 损伤的能力的初步发现令人鼓舞;实际上,智能支具可以通过同时评估旋转和平移松弛度,为 ACL 撕裂的客观和定量诊断提供有效支持。为了获得有关系统实际有效性的可靠信息,需要进一步的临床验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f65/9371041/340cd9c89fb7/sensors-22-05815-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f65/9371041/6b8167e1fe71/sensors-22-05815-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f65/9371041/d2436bea8e49/sensors-22-05815-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f65/9371041/eeb59f298f83/sensors-22-05815-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f65/9371041/b0378c34edcc/sensors-22-05815-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f65/9371041/c05e793876a1/sensors-22-05815-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f65/9371041/463b678a5a93/sensors-22-05815-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f65/9371041/29b485d3998e/sensors-22-05815-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f65/9371041/9d131a0cfbb6/sensors-22-05815-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f65/9371041/bdbef092a6a0/sensors-22-05815-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f65/9371041/c05ffad303ff/sensors-22-05815-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f65/9371041/7137f87ec806/sensors-22-05815-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f65/9371041/e217acd9f6b6/sensors-22-05815-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f65/9371041/25dcce47a619/sensors-22-05815-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f65/9371041/340cd9c89fb7/sensors-22-05815-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f65/9371041/6b8167e1fe71/sensors-22-05815-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f65/9371041/d2436bea8e49/sensors-22-05815-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f65/9371041/eeb59f298f83/sensors-22-05815-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f65/9371041/b0378c34edcc/sensors-22-05815-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f65/9371041/c05e793876a1/sensors-22-05815-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f65/9371041/463b678a5a93/sensors-22-05815-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f65/9371041/29b485d3998e/sensors-22-05815-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f65/9371041/9d131a0cfbb6/sensors-22-05815-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f65/9371041/bdbef092a6a0/sensors-22-05815-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f65/9371041/c05ffad303ff/sensors-22-05815-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f65/9371041/7137f87ec806/sensors-22-05815-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f65/9371041/e217acd9f6b6/sensors-22-05815-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f65/9371041/25dcce47a619/sensors-22-05815-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f65/9371041/340cd9c89fb7/sensors-22-05815-g014.jpg

相似文献

1
Smart Brace for Static and Dynamic Knee Laxity Measurement.智能静态和动态膝关节松弛度测量臂带
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Aug 4;22(15):5815. doi: 10.3390/s22155815.
2
[Evaluation of the clinical results in patients with symptomatic partial tears of the anterior cruciate ligament diagnosed arthroscopically].[关节镜诊断的有症状的前交叉韧带部分撕裂患者临床结果评估]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2013;80(1):53-9.
3
Rotational Laxity Control by the Anterolateral Ligament and the Lateral Meniscus Is Dependent on Knee Flexion Angle: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study.前外侧韧带和外侧半月板对旋转松弛的控制取决于膝关节屈曲角度:一项尸体生物力学研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Oct;475(10):2401-2408. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5364-z.
4
The Effect of an ACL Reconstruction in Controlling Rotational Knee Stability in Knees with Intact and Physiologic Laxity of Secondary Restraints as Defined by Tibiofemoral Compartment Translations and Graft Forces.ACL 重建对膝关节旋转稳定性的影响,这些膝关节的二次约束结构完好且具有生理性松弛,其定义为胫股关节间室平移和移植物力。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Apr 4;100(7):586-597. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01412.
5
Anterior and Rotational Knee Laxity Does Not Affect Patient-Reported Knee Function 2 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.前向和旋转膝关节松弛不会影响前交叉韧带重建后 2 年的患者报告膝关节功能。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Jul;47(9):2077-2085. doi: 10.1177/0363546519857076.
6
Rotatory Knee Laxity Exists on a Continuum in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury.旋转膝关节松弛在 ACL 损伤中呈连续状态存在。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Feb 5;102(3):213-220. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.00502.
7
Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis Reduces Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Force and Anterior Tibial Translation in Response to Applied Pivoting and Anterior Drawer Loads.外侧关节外腱固定术可减少前交叉韧带移植物的受力和胫骨前移位,以应对旋转和前抽屉负荷。
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Nov;48(13):3183-3193. doi: 10.1177/0363546520959322. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
8
[Augmentation of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament in Patients with Symptomatic Isolated Tear of Anteromedial or Posterolateral Bundle: Evaluation of Two-Year Clinical Results].[有症状的前内侧或后外侧束孤立性撕裂患者的前交叉韧带增强术:两年临床结果评估]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2015;82(4):296-302.
9
Anterolateral Knee Extra-articular Stabilizers: A Robotic Study Comparing Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction and Modified Lemaire Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis.膝关节前外侧关节外稳定结构:机器人研究比较前外侧韧带重建与改良 Lemaire 外侧关节外腱固定术
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Mar;46(3):607-616. doi: 10.1177/0363546517745268. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
10
Engagement of the Secondary Ligamentous and Meniscal Restraints Relative to the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Predicts Anterior Knee Laxity.次级韧带和半月板约束相对于前交叉韧带的参与预测膝关节前侧松弛。
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Jan;48(1):109-116. doi: 10.1177/0363546519888488. Epub 2019 Nov 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Three-Dimensional Human Posture Recognition by Extremity Angle Estimation with Minimal IMU Sensor.基于最小惯性测量单元传感器的肢体角度估计的三维人体姿态识别。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jul 2;24(13):4306. doi: 10.3390/s24134306.
2
Relationship of strength, joint kinesthesia, and plantar tactile sensation to dynamic and static postural stability among patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.前交叉韧带重建患者的力量、关节本体感觉和足底触觉与动态及静态姿势稳定性的关系
Front Physiol. 2023 Jan 18;14:1112708. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1112708. eCollection 2023.
3
Adaptive Data Transmission Algorithm for the System of Inertial Sensors for Hand Movement Acquisition.

本文引用的文献

1
Compensating for Soft-Tissue Artifact Using the Orientation of Distal Limb Segments During Electromagnetic Motion Capture of the Upper Limb.使用上肢电磁运动捕捉过程中远端肢体节段的方向补偿软组织伪影。
J Biomech Eng. 2022 Jul 1;144(7). doi: 10.1115/1.4053366.
2
Effect of the soft tissue artifact on marker measurements and on the calculation of the helical axis of the knee during a gait cycle: A study on the CAMS-Knee data set.软组织伪影对步态周期中膝关节标志点测量和螺旋轴计算的影响:基于 CAMS-Knee 数据集的研究。
Hum Mov Sci. 2021 Dec;80:102866. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2021.102866. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
3
Non-invasive computer navigation can quantify the pivot shift maneuver with good to excellent reliability in healthy volunteers.
用于手部运动采集的惯性传感器系统的自适应数据传输算法。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Dec 15;22(24):9866. doi: 10.3390/s22249866.
非侵入性计算机导航能够在健康志愿者中以良好至优异的可靠性对轴移试验进行量化。
J Exp Orthop. 2020 Apr 17;7(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s40634-020-00239-5.
4
Education and repetition improve success rate and quantitative measures of the pivot shift test.教育和重复可提高髌股关节(Pivot Shift)试验的成功率和定量测量结果。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Nov;27(11):3418-3425. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05370-0. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
5
Validation of Quantitative Measures of Rotatory Knee Laxity.膝关节旋转松弛度定量测量的验证
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Sep;44(9):2393-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546516650667. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
6
Quantification of the pivot-shift test using a navigation system with non-invasive surface markers.使用带有非侵入性表面标记的导航系统对轴移试验进行量化。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Nov;24(11):3612-3618. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4165-3. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
7
Objective measures on knee instability: dynamic tests: a review of devices for assessment of dynamic knee laxity through utilization of the pivot shift test.膝关节不稳定的客观测量:动态测试:通过利用轴移试验评估动态膝关节松弛度的装置综述
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2016 Jun;9(2):148-59. doi: 10.1007/s12178-016-9338-7.
8
Incidence of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears and Reconstruction: A 21-Year Population-Based Study.前交叉韧带撕裂与重建的发病率:一项基于人群的21年研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Jun;44(6):1502-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546516629944. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
9
Quantitative comparison of the pivot shift test results before and after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by using the three-dimensional electromagnetic measurement system.运用三维电磁测量系统对前交叉韧带重建前后的轴移试验结果进行定量比较。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Oct;23(10):2876-81. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3776-4. Epub 2015 Sep 5.
10
Novel approach to dynamic knee laxity measurement using capacitive strain gauges.使用电容式应变仪测量膝关节动态松弛度的新方法。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Oct;23(10):2868-75. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3771-9. Epub 2015 Sep 2.