• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用 K-均值聚类法进行教育评估数据分析。

Data Analysis of Educational Evaluation Using K-Means Clustering Method.

机构信息

Science Teaching Department, Zhengzhou Preschool Education College, Zhengzhou 450000, China.

出版信息

Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Jul 31;2022:3762431. doi: 10.1155/2022/3762431. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1155/2022/3762431
PMID:35958764
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9357756/
Abstract

It is thought to be an effective technique to handle the problem of educational data explosion and lack of information by identifying potential relationships between data and directing decision-makers through the extraction, transformation, analysis, and modeling of educational data. Based on this, this research constructs a data analysis model for education evaluation using the K-means clustering technique in DM. The weight of each index of students' comprehensive quality is calculated using AHP, and the value of the weight is used to determine whether the index is the important feature of analysis system mining. Improved sampling technology is used to deal with the representation of large-scale data sets; a sample partition clustering technique is proposed as a general framework. The best accuracy of this method, according to experimental data, is 95.6 percent, which is 12.1 percent greater than Mi cluster algorithm and 6.8 percent higher than DRCluster algorithm. The K-means clustering analysis technology is used to analyze students' comprehensive evaluation data in this paper, with the goal of determining the regularity of data implication, accurately diagnosing learning problems, and providing the foundation for developing effective student management strategies.

摘要

人们认为,通过识别数据之间的潜在关系,并通过对教育数据进行提取、转换、分析和建模,为决策者提供指导,可以有效解决教育数据爆炸和信息匮乏的问题。基于此,本研究构建了一个基于数据挖掘(DM)中的 K-均值聚类技术的教育评估数据分析模型。使用层次分析法(AHP)计算学生综合素质各指标的权重,并使用权重值来确定该指标是否为分析系统挖掘的重要特征。改进的抽样技术用于处理大规模数据集的表示;提出了一种样本分区聚类技术作为通用框架。根据实验数据,该方法的最佳准确率为 95.6%,比 Mi 聚类算法高 12.1%,比 DRCluster 算法高 6.8%。本文采用 K-均值聚类分析技术对学生的综合评价数据进行分析,旨在确定数据蕴涵的规律,准确诊断学习问题,为制定有效的学生管理策略提供依据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ad/9357756/462866a52047/CIN2022-3762431.007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ad/9357756/9ad300417428/CIN2022-3762431.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ad/9357756/9d619d25b7a8/CIN2022-3762431.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ad/9357756/b4da07aac3c6/CIN2022-3762431.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ad/9357756/13b458a016d8/CIN2022-3762431.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ad/9357756/5c1ce2ad2690/CIN2022-3762431.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ad/9357756/284980c89f39/CIN2022-3762431.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ad/9357756/462866a52047/CIN2022-3762431.007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ad/9357756/9ad300417428/CIN2022-3762431.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ad/9357756/9d619d25b7a8/CIN2022-3762431.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ad/9357756/b4da07aac3c6/CIN2022-3762431.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ad/9357756/13b458a016d8/CIN2022-3762431.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ad/9357756/5c1ce2ad2690/CIN2022-3762431.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ad/9357756/284980c89f39/CIN2022-3762431.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61ad/9357756/462866a52047/CIN2022-3762431.007.jpg

相似文献

1
Data Analysis of Educational Evaluation Using K-Means Clustering Method.运用 K-均值聚类法进行教育评估数据分析。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Jul 31;2022:3762431. doi: 10.1155/2022/3762431. eCollection 2022.
2
Higher Education Management and Student Achievement Assessment Method Based on Clustering Algorithm.基于聚类算法的高等教育管理与学生成绩评估方法。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Jul 4;2022:4703975. doi: 10.1155/2022/4703975. eCollection 2022.
3
Visual analysis and interactive interface design of students' abnormal behavior introducing clustering algorithm.学生异常行为引入聚类算法的可视化分析与交互界面设计。
Technol Health Care. 2024;32(6):4947-4963. doi: 10.3233/THC-232054.
4
Research and Application of Clustering Algorithm for Text Big Data.文本大数据聚类算法的研究与应用
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Jun 8;2022:7042778. doi: 10.1155/2022/7042778. eCollection 2022.
5
Research on Data Analysis of Traditional Chinese Medicine with Improved Differential Evolution Clustering Algorithm.基于改进差分进化聚类算法的中医数据分析研究。
J Healthc Eng. 2021 Sep 4;2021:4468741. doi: 10.1155/2021/4468741. eCollection 2021.
6
Towards teaching analytics: a contextual model for analysis of students' evaluation of teaching through text mining and machine learning classification.迈向教学分析:一种通过文本挖掘和机器学习分类来分析学生教学评价的情境模型。
Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2022;27(3):3891-3933. doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10751-5. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
7
A Mental Health Management and Cognitive Behavior Analysis Model of College Students Using Multi-View Clustering Analysis Algorithm.基于多视图聚类分析算法的大学生心理健康管理与认知行为分析模型。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Sep 27;2022:2813473. doi: 10.1155/2022/2813473. eCollection 2022.
8
Feature fusion and clustering for key frame extraction.特征融合与聚类用于关键帧提取。
Math Biosci Eng. 2021 Oct 27;18(6):9294-9311. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021457.
9
Impact Assessment of Big Data on Higher Education Management Based on Time-Varying Clustering Sampling Algorithm.基于时变聚类抽样算法的大数据对高等教育管理的影响评估。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2021 Dec 14;2021:7954797. doi: 10.1155/2021/7954797. eCollection 2021.
10
Autoencoder-based cluster ensembles for single-cell RNA-seq data analysis.基于自动编码器的单细胞 RNA-seq 数据分析聚类集成。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2019 Dec 24;20(Suppl 19):660. doi: 10.1186/s12859-019-3179-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of influencing factors of China university teaching quality based on fuzzy logic and deep learning technology.基于模糊逻辑和深度学习技术的中国大学教学质量影响因素评估。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 6;19(9):e0303613. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303613. eCollection 2024.
2
Illness perceptions and blood pressure control among hypertensive Filipino Americans: A cross-sectional study.高血压菲美裔人群的疾病感知与血压控制:一项横断面研究。
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2024 Nov 1;36(11):607-618. doi: 10.1097/JXX.0000000000001032.

本文引用的文献

1
Self-reported confidence and perceived training needs of surgical interns at a regional hospital in Ghana: a questionnaire survey.加纳一家地区医院外科实习生的自我报告信心及感知到的培训需求:一项问卷调查
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Oct 27;20(1):386. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02319-7.
2
Students' Evaluation of Teaching and Their Academic Achievement in a Higher Education Institution of Ecuador.厄瓜多尔一所高等教育机构中学生对教学的评价及其学业成绩
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 6;11:233. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00233. eCollection 2020.
3
Teaching a difficult topic using a problem-based concept resembling a computer game: development and evaluation of an e-learning application for medical molecular genetics.
使用类似于电脑游戏的基于问题的概念教授一个难题:医学分子遗传学电子学习应用程序的开发和评估。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Oct 24;19(1):390. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1817-2.
4
Evidence-Based Principles for Using Technology-Enhanced Learning in the Continuing Professional Development of Health Professionals.卫生专业人员持续专业发展中使用技术增强学习的循证原则。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2017 Winter;37(1):61-66. doi: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000146.
5
Assessment and comparison of student engagement in a variety of physiology courses.评估与比较学生在各种生理学课程中的参与度。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2016 Mar;40(1):70-8. doi: 10.1152/advan.00129.2015.
6
Motivating medical students to do research: a mixed methods study using Self-Determination Theory.激励医学生进行研究:一项运用自我决定理论的混合方法研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2015 Jun 2;15:95. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0379-1.
7
Consumerism and consumer complexity: implications for university teaching and teaching evaluation.消费主义与消费者复杂性:对大学教学及教学评估的影响
Nurse Educ Today. 2013 Jul;33(7):720-3. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.03.004. Epub 2013 Apr 9.
8
A pilot study to evaluate the use of virtual lectures for undergraduate radiology teaching.一项评估虚拟讲座在本科放射学教学中应用的初步研究。
Eur J Radiol. 2013 May;82(5):888-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.01.027. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
9
Evaluation of clinical teaching in general practice using the Maastricht Clinical Teaching Questionnaire.使用马斯特里赫特临床教学问卷对全科医学临床教学进行评估。
Med Teach. 2012;34(12):1089. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.716562. Epub 2012 Aug 30.