Chang Tzu-Fen, Lee Gabrielle T, Bruce Alyssia T, Powell Denise N, Yang Li-Hsuan
California State University, Bakersfield, CA, USA.
Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Psychol Rep. 2024 Feb;127(1):276-298. doi: 10.1177/00332941221119407. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
Research indicates that teachers' theories of intelligence (incremental vs. entity) are likely to affect their teaching practices, and some teachers hold lower expectations for students with learning disabilities. This study explored the relationships between college instructors' theories of intelligence and the feedback they provided based on a student's writing sample under two conditions: the student's dyslexia was mentioned versus not mentioned. One hundred and one college instructors completed a survey. Results of path analysis indicated the instructors who endorsed the incremental theory of intelligence gave significantly more encouraging comments than those who endorsed the entity theory. Instructors' theories of intelligence did not predict the grade assigned, the number of weaknesses pointed out, and the number of suggestions provided. The instructors informed of the student's dyslexia gave significantly higher grades than those not informed, but the instructors' feedback did not differ. No significant interaction between instructors' theories of intelligence and awareness of student dyslexia was found.
研究表明,教师的智力理论(增量型与实体型)可能会影响他们的教学实践,而且一些教师对学习有障碍的学生期望较低。本研究探讨了大学教师的智力理论与他们在两种情况下根据学生写作样本提供的反馈之间的关系:提及学生的诵读困难与未提及。101名大学教师完成了一项调查。路径分析结果表明,支持增量智力理论的教师比支持实体理论的教师给出的鼓励性评论要多得多。教师的智力理论并不能预测所给出的成绩、指出的弱点数量和提供的建议数量。被告知学生诵读困难的教师给出的成绩明显高于未被告知的教师,但教师的反馈并无差异。未发现教师的智力理论与对学生诵读困难的认知之间存在显著交互作用。