• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于模糊约束的医患共同决策代理协商框架。

Fuzzy constraint-based agent negotiation framework for doctor-patient shared decision-making.

机构信息

School of Computer and Information Engineering, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen, 361024, China.

Engineering Research Center of Big Data Application in Private Health Medicine, Fujian Provincial University, Putian, 351100, China.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Aug 13;22(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01963-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12911-022-01963-x
PMID:35964129
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9375298/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The clinical practice of shared decision-making (SDM) has grown in importance. However, most studies on SDM practice concentrated on providing auxiliary knowledge from the third-party standpoint without consideration for the value preferences of doctors and patients. The essences of these methods are complete and manual negotiation, and the problems of high cost, time consumption, delayed response, and decision fatigue are serious.

METHODS

In response to the above limitations, this article proposes a fuzzy constraint-directed agent-based negotiation and recommendation framework for bilateral and multi-issue preference negotiation in SDM (PN-SDM). Its purpose is to provide preference information and intellectualize PN-SDM to promote SDM practice. We modeled PN-SDM problems as distributed fuzzy constraint satisfaction problems and designed the doctor agent and patient agent to negotiate on behalf of the doctor and patient. The negotiation result was then transformed into treatment plans by the recommendation model. The proposed negotiation and recommendation models were introduced in detail by an instance.

RESULTS

The proposed method with different strategies and negotiation pairs achieves good performance in terms of negotiation running time, negotiation rounds, and combined aggregated satisfaction value. Specifically, it can feasibly and effectively complete multiple rounds of PN-SDM in a few seconds and obtain higher satisfaction.

CONCLUSION

The experimental results indicate that the negotiation model can effectively simulate preference negotiation and relieve the pressure of increasing issues. The recommendation model can assist in decision-making and help to realize SDM. In addition, it can flexibly cope with various negotiation scenarios by using different negotiation strategies (e.g., collaborative, win-win, and competitive).

摘要

背景

共享决策(SDM)的临床实践变得越来越重要。然而,大多数关于 SDM 实践的研究都集中于从第三方的角度提供辅助知识,而没有考虑医生和患者的价值偏好。这些方法的本质是完全手动协商,存在成本高、耗时、响应延迟和决策疲劳等问题。

方法

针对上述局限性,本文提出了一种模糊约束导向的基于代理的双边和多议题偏好协商框架用于 SDM 中的偏好协商(PN-SDM)。其目的是提供偏好信息并实现 PN-SDM 的智能化,以促进 SDM 的实践。我们将 PN-SDM 问题建模为分布式模糊约束满足问题,并设计了医生代理和患者代理代表医生和患者进行协商。然后,推荐模型将协商结果转换为治疗方案。通过实例详细介绍了提出的协商和推荐模型。

结果

不同策略和协商对的提出方法在协商运行时间、协商轮数和综合聚合满意度值方面都取得了良好的效果。具体来说,它可以在几秒钟内以合理且有效的方式完成多轮 PN-SDM,并获得更高的满意度。

结论

实验结果表明,协商模型可以有效地模拟偏好协商并减轻议题增加的压力。推荐模型可以协助决策并有助于实现 SDM。此外,通过使用不同的协商策略(如协作、双赢和竞争),它可以灵活应对各种协商场景。

相似文献

1
Fuzzy constraint-based agent negotiation framework for doctor-patient shared decision-making.基于模糊约束的医患共同决策代理协商框架。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Aug 13;22(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01963-x.
2
An opponent model for agent-based shared decision-making via a genetic algorithm.一种通过遗传算法实现基于智能体的共享决策的对手模型。
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 3;14:1124734. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1124734. eCollection 2023.
3
Using hybrid consistent fuzzy preference relations-importance-performance analysis model to improve shared decision-making quality based on orthopaedic nurses' perceptions.基于骨科护士感知,利用混合一致性模糊偏好关系-重要性-绩效分析模型提高共享决策质量。
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Jul;32(13-14):3568-3575. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16427. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
4
Effect of a Skills Training for Oncologists and a Patient Communication Aid on Shared Decision Making About Palliative Systemic Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial.肿瘤学家技能培训和患者沟通辅助工具对姑息性系统治疗决策共享的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Oncologist. 2020 Mar;25(3):e578-e588. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0453. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
5
"I need to know what makes somebody tick …": Challenges and Strategies of Implementing Shared Decision-Making in Individualized Oncology.“我需要知道是什么在驱动着……”:个体化肿瘤学中实施共享决策的挑战与策略。
Oncologist. 2019 Apr;24(4):555-562. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0615. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
6
Patients' and physicians' gender and perspective on shared decision-making: A cross-sectional study from Dubai.患者和医生的性别以及对共同决策的看法:来自迪拜的一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 1;17(9):e0270700. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270700. eCollection 2022.
7
Shared decision making, physicians' explanations, and treatment satisfaction: a cross-sectional survey of prostate cancer patients.共同决策、医生的解释与治疗满意度:一项针对前列腺癌患者的横断面调查。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Dec 14;20(1):334. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01355-z.
8
Shared decision making process measures and patient problems.共享决策过程的测量和患者问题。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Jul;105(7):2457-2465. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.11.001. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
9
Shared decision making in dermato-oncology: preference for involvement of melanoma patients.皮肤科肿瘤学中的共同决策:黑色素瘤患者更倾向于参与。
Melanoma Res. 2014 Feb;24(1):68-74. doi: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000030.
10
The Shared Decision-Making Process in the Pharmacological Management of Depression.抑郁症药物治疗中的共同决策过程。
Patient. 2020 Feb;13(1):23-30. doi: 10.1007/s40271-019-00383-w.

引用本文的文献

1
Deep deterministic policy gradient-based automatic negotiation framework for shared decision-making.基于深度确定性策略梯度的共享决策自动协商框架
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 20;15(1):26337. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-11001-1.
2
An opponent model for agent-based shared decision-making via a genetic algorithm.一种通过遗传算法实现基于智能体的共享决策的对手模型。
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 3;14:1124734. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1124734. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
A meta-analysis of Watson for Oncology in clinical application.基于 Watson for Oncology 的临床应用的荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 11;11(1):5792. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84973-5.
2
The effect of decision fatigue on surgeons' clinical decision making.决策疲劳对外科医生临床决策的影响。
Health Econ. 2019 Oct;28(10):1194-1203. doi: 10.1002/hec.3933. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
3
Patient Education and Continuing Medical Education to Promote Shared Decision-Making. A Systematic Literature Review.患者教育和继续医学教育促进共同决策。系统文献回顾。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 12;16(14):2482. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16142482.
4
The Development and Evaluation of Personalized Training in Shared Decision-making Skills for Rheumatologists.类风湿关节炎专科医师共享决策技能个体化培训的开发与评价。
J Rheumatol. 2020 Feb;47(2):290-297. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.180780. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
5
Clinical decisions and time since rest break: An analysis of decision fatigue in nurses.临床决策与休息后时间:护士决策疲劳分析。
Health Psychol. 2019 Apr;38(4):318-324. doi: 10.1037/hea0000725.
6
Development of Patient Decision Aids for Plaque Psoriasis and Acne.斑块状银屑病和痤疮患者决策辅助工具的开发。
Dermatol Online J. 2018 Jul 15;24(7):13030/qt6z27q8bq.
7
Decision aids that really promote shared decision making: the pace quickens.真正促进共同决策的决策辅助工具:步伐加快。
BMJ. 2015 Feb 10;350:g7624. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7624.
8
Using a 'talk' model of shared decision making to propose an observation-based measure: Observer OPTION 5 Item.使用“对话”模型的共享决策来提出一个基于观察的测量指标:观察者选项 5 项目。
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Nov;93(2):265-71. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.08.005. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
9
Shared decision making--pinnacle of patient-centered care.共同决策——以患者为中心的医疗的巅峰。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 1;366(9):780-1. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1109283.
10
Aligning ethics with medical decision-making: the quest for informed patient choice.使伦理与医疗决策保持一致:寻求患者的知情选择。
J Law Med Ethics. 2010 Spring;38(1):85-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2010.00469.x.