• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心理健康自我管理问卷在中国心境和焦虑障碍患者中的信效度研究

Reliability and validity of the Mental Health Self-management Questionnaire among Chinese patients with mood and anxiety disorders.

作者信息

Wang Mengmeng, Wang Jingjun, Wang Ya, Huang Xia, Huang Yalin, Huang Junqiang, Feng Yan, Li Xiaolin

机构信息

West China School of Nursing and West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Department of Nursing, West China Hospital and West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 29;13:952951. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.952951. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.952951
PMID:35966465
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9372341/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Self-management plays an important role in promoting and restoring mental health for individuals with mental health issues. However, there is no valid and reliable Chinese tool assessing the self-management behaviors of people with mood and anxiety disorders. This study aimed to develop a Chinese version of the Mental Health Self-management Questionnaire (MHSQ-C) and to verify its psychometric properties.

METHODS

A total of 440 potential participants were recruited by convenience sampling from June to August 2020. Item analysis and analyses of internal consistency, test-retest reliability, content validity, construct validity and criterion validity were performed.

RESULTS

Data from 326 participants were used. Three factors obtained principal component analysis and varimax rotation explained 53.68% of the total variance. The average content validity index was 0.99. The Cronbach's α coefficient (total: 0.874, clinical: 0.706, empowerment: 0.818, vitality: 0.830) and test-retest reliability (ICC: total: 0.783, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.616, 0.882], clinical: 0.525, 95% CI [0.240, 0.725], empowerment: 0.786, 95% CI [0.622, 0.884], vitality: 0.748, 95% CI [0.564, 0.862]) were good. The MHSQ-C was well correlated with the Partners in Health scale and showed no floor or ceiling effect.

DISCUSSION

The MHSQ-C is a reliable and valid tool to evaluate the self-management strategies of patients with mood and anxiety disorders.

摘要

背景

自我管理在促进和恢复有心理健康问题的个体的心理健康方面起着重要作用。然而,目前尚无有效且可靠的中文工具来评估情绪和焦虑障碍患者的自我管理行为。本研究旨在开发中文版心理健康自我管理问卷(MHSQ-C)并验证其心理测量学特性。

方法

2020年6月至8月通过便利抽样招募了440名潜在参与者。进行了项目分析以及内部一致性、重测信度、内容效度、结构效度和效标效度分析。

结果

使用了326名参与者的数据。通过主成分分析和方差最大化旋转得到的三个因子解释了总方差的53.68%。平均内容效度指数为0.99。克朗巴赫α系数(总量表:0.874,临床分量表:0.706,赋权分量表:0.818,活力分量表:0.830)和重测信度(组内相关系数:总量表:0.783,95%置信区间[CI][0.616, 0.882],临床分量表:0.525,95% CI[0.240, 0.725],赋权分量表:0.786,95% CI[0.622, 0.884],活力分量表:0.748,95% CI[0.564, 0.862])良好。MHSQ-C与健康伙伴量表相关性良好,且无地板效应或天花板效应。

讨论

MHSQ-C是评估情绪和焦虑障碍患者自我管理策略的可靠且有效的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c0a/9372341/02de455821a6/fpsyt-13-952951-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c0a/9372341/131f7198bc06/fpsyt-13-952951-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c0a/9372341/02de455821a6/fpsyt-13-952951-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c0a/9372341/131f7198bc06/fpsyt-13-952951-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c0a/9372341/02de455821a6/fpsyt-13-952951-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Reliability and validity of the Mental Health Self-management Questionnaire among Chinese patients with mood and anxiety disorders.心理健康自我管理问卷在中国心境和焦虑障碍患者中的信效度研究
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 29;13:952951. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.952951. eCollection 2022.
2
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Mental Health Self-management Questionnaire among people with mental illness living in the community.社区精神疾病患者心理健康自我管理问卷的日本版信度和效度。
BMC Psychol. 2019 May 22;7(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s40359-019-0301-4.
3
Mental health self-management questionnaire: Development and psychometric properties.心理健康自我管理问卷:编制与心理测量学特性
J Affect Disord. 2015 Aug 1;181:41-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.04.007. Epub 2015 Apr 11.
4
Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia-11 Among Patients Who Have Undergone Total Knee Arthroplasty.中文版 Tampa 运动恐惧量表-11 在全膝关节置换术后患者中的跨文化适应性、信度和效度。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jun;34(6):1116-1121. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.01.076. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
5
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the LMC Skills, Confidence & Preparedness Index (SCPI) in patients with type 2 diabetes.中文版 LMC 技能、信心和准备度指数(SCPI)在 2 型糖尿病患者中的信度和效度。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Jan 20;19(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01664-x.
6
Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of the EMPOWER-SUSTAIN Usability Questionnaire (E-SUQ) among Patients with Metabolic Syndrome in Primary Care.代谢综合征患者初级保健中 EMPOWER-SUSTAIN 可用性问卷(E-SUQ)的调适和心理计量学验证。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 6;18(17):9405. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179405.
7
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) for people with chronic mental illness: scale development.慢性精神疾病患者康复评估量表(RAS)的日语版的信度和效度:量表编制。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Mar;47(3):314-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.07.006. Epub 2009 Aug 12.
8
Child-Adolescent Teasing Scale: psychometric properties of the Turkish version.儿童青少年取笑量表:土耳其语版本的心理测量特性
Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2018 Sep;23(3):283-290. doi: 10.1111/camh.12250. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
9
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale-Revised in patients with cancer: A cross-sectional study.中文版流行病学研究抑郁量表修订版在癌症患者中的心理计量特性:一项横断面研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2019 Sep;97:14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.04.008. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
10
Craniofacial pain and disability inventory (CF-PDI): development and psychometric validation of a new questionnaire.颅面疼痛与功能障碍量表(CF-PDI):一种新问卷的编制及心理测量学验证
Pain Physician. 2014 Jan-Feb;17(1):95-108.

本文引用的文献

1
Recurrence of anxiety disorders and its predictors in the general population.一般人群中焦虑障碍的复发及其预测因素。
Psychol Med. 2023 Mar;53(4):1334-1342. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721002877. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
2
Reliability, Validity, and Measurement Invariance of the General Anxiety Disorder Scale Among Chinese Medical University Students.中国医科大学生广泛性焦虑障碍量表的信度、效度及测量不变性
Front Psychiatry. 2021 May 19;12:648755. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.648755. eCollection 2021.
3
The effects of intensive home treatment on self-efficacy in patients recovering from a psychiatric crisis.
强化家庭治疗对从精神危机中康复的患者自我效能感的影响。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2021 Jan 6;15(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13033-020-00426-y.
4
Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of Illness Management and Recovery Scale-Patient form.《疾病管理和康复量表-患者形式土耳其语版本的心理测量特性》。
Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2021 Jan;57(1):279-286. doi: 10.1111/ppc.12559. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
5
Twelve-month treatment of mental disorders in the Saudi National Mental Health Survey.沙特国家心理健康调查中精神障碍的 12 个月治疗情况。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2020 Sep;29(3):e1832. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1832. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
6
Prevalence of Mood and Anxiety Disorders Among Adults Seeking Care in Primary Healthcare Centers in Cordoba, Argentina.阿根廷科尔多瓦初级医疗保健中心成年求医者中情绪和焦虑症的患病率
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Mar 27;11:232. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00232. eCollection 2020.
7
Using the CHIME Personal Recovery Framework to Evaluate the Validity of the MHRM-10 in Individuals with Psychosis.使用 CHIME 个人康复框架评估 MHRM-10 在精神病患者中的有效性。
Psychiatr Q. 2020 Sep;91(3):793-805. doi: 10.1007/s11126-020-09737-2.
8
Measuring personal recovery in people with a psychotic disorder based on CHIME: A comparison of three validated measures.基于CHIME对精神病性障碍患者的个人康复情况进行测量:三种有效测量方法的比较。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Oct;29(5):808-819. doi: 10.1111/inm.12711. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
9
Why do children and adolescents (not) seek and access professional help for their mental health problems? A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies.为什么儿童和青少年(不)寻求和获得专业帮助来解决他们的心理健康问题?一项对定量和定性研究的系统综述。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2021 Feb;30(2):183-211. doi: 10.1007/s00787-019-01469-4. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
10
Delineating the concept of self-management in chronic conditions: a concept analysis.阐述慢性病自我管理的概念:概念分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 16;9(7):e027775. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027775.