Malhotra Ragini Saira
University of Southern Maine, Portland, USA.
Int J Child Care Educ Policy. 2022;16(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s40723-022-00101-4. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
Scholarship remains divided about whether emotional labor is 'skilled'. Interrogating gendered skill constructs that render emotions in work invisible, I examine two organizational contexts in the Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) sector: family and center-based care. I draw from 43 interviews, primarily with Latina and White women workers, reflecting feminized and racialized workplaces. I also draw from ethnographic and observational data. Challenging the particular devaluation of family-based care, findings reveal that the practice of skill in emotional labor is organizationally shaped across less and more institutionalized forms of ECEC. Examining worker critiques of professionalization norms and credential-based skill metrics, autonomy is also identified as a pre-requisite for embodied, tacit and discretionary skills in the emotional labor of ECEC.
对于情感劳动是否“有技能”,学术界仍存在分歧。通过审视那些使工作中的情感变得无形的性别化技能结构,我研究了幼儿教育与保育(ECEC)部门的两种组织情境:家庭式保育和中心式保育。我借鉴了43次访谈,主要对象是拉丁裔和白人女性工作者,这些访谈反映了女性化和种族化的工作场所。我还借鉴了人种志和观察数据。研究结果挑战了对家庭式保育的特殊贬低,表明情感劳动技能的实践在ECEC较少制度化和较多制度化的形式中都受到组织塑造。通过审视工作者对职业化规范和基于证书的技能指标的批评,自主性也被确定为ECEC情感劳动中体现性、隐性和自由裁量技能的一个先决条件。