Department of Psychological Counselling, Faculty of Psychology, Mejiro University, Tokyo, Japan.
J Forensic Sci. 2022 Nov;67(6):2367-2375. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.15126. Epub 2022 Aug 15.
This study examined the offender characteristics of criminal mutilation homicides in Japan for offender profiling. The current sample (N = 108) showed that the most typical offender was a male, in his 30s (age that observed most often), one-person, and acquainted with the victim. This study highlighted that the cases of mutilation homicide differed in comparison with the regular homicide group in terms of the victim-offender (VO) relationship and the number of offenders. Furthermore, the multiple correspondence analysis classified mutilation homicides into four behavioral pattern types based on two dimensions (level of "efforts of corpse dismemberment" and "efforts of corpse disposal"). In the first type "high evidence destruction effort (n = 29)", having the greatest efforts to destroy evidence, all offenders were men. The rates of no VO relationship and serial murders were higher. In the second type "convenient disposal (n = 32)", likely to abandon victim body in home and trash, the rate of female offenders who assaulted family members was statistically significantly higher among the four types. In the third type "high geographic distance (n = 23)", traveling long distances for corpse disposal, the percentage of cases by co-offenders was likely to be higher than in the other types. Lastly, the offenders in "low evidence destruction effort (n = 24)" were likely to kill other acquaintances and have the least efforts for corpse dismemberment and disposal. From these results, the criminal profilers can estimate mutilation homicide offenders on the basis of efforts of corpse dismemberment and disposal.
本研究旨在探讨日本犯罪残杀案件中罪犯的特征,以为犯罪侧写提供参考。本研究的当前样本(N=108)显示,最典型的罪犯是男性,年龄在 30 多岁(最常见的年龄段),独自一人,与受害者相识。与常规杀人案件相比,本研究强调了此类残杀案件在罪犯-受害者(VO)关系和罪犯人数方面的差异。此外,多元对应分析基于两个维度(“尸体肢解努力程度”和“尸体处理努力程度”)将残杀案件分为四种行为模式类型。在第一种“高度破坏证据努力(n=29)”中,所有罪犯都有最大的破坏证据的努力,没有 VO 关系和连续杀人的比例更高。在第二种“方便处理(n=32)”中,罪犯可能会在家庭和垃圾桶中抛弃受害者的尸体,四种类型中,女性罪犯袭击家庭成员的比例明显更高。在第三种“远距离处理(n=23)”中,罪犯可能会为了处理尸体而长途跋涉,共同犯罪的比例可能高于其他类型。最后,在“低破坏证据努力(n=24)”中,罪犯可能会杀害其他熟人,并且在尸体肢解和处理方面的努力最小。根据这些结果,犯罪侧写人员可以根据尸体肢解和处理的努力程度来估计残杀案件的罪犯。