Suppr超能文献

中国南方家庭灰尘和手巾中的新兴增塑剂:是否需要引起关注?

Emerging Plasticizers in South China House Dust and Hand Wipes: Calling for Potential Concern?

机构信息

School of Environment, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution and Health, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China.

State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Health Risk Assessment, South China Institute of Environmental Sciences, MEE, Guangzhou 510530, China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Technol. 2022 Sep 6;56(17):12190-12199. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c02106. Epub 2022 Aug 17.

Abstract

Following regulations on legacy plasticizers, a large variety of industrial chemicals have been employed as substitutes to manufacture consumer products. However, knowledge remains limited on their environmental distributions, fate, and human exposure risks. In the present work, we screened for a total of 34 emerging plasticizers in house dust from South China and matched hand wipes collected from volunteers ( = 49 pairs). The results revealed a frequent detection of 27 emerging plasticizers in house dust, with the total concentrations reaching a median level of 106 700 ng/g. Thirteen of them had never been investigated by any environmental studies prior to our work, which included glycerol monooleate (median: 61 600 ng/g), methyl oleate (16 400 ng/g), butyl oleate (411 ng/g), 2,2,4-trimethyl-1,3-pentanediol monoisobutyrate (341 ng/g), 2,2,4-trimethyl-1,3-pentanediol diisobutyrate (105 ng/g), isopropyl myristate (154 ng/g), di(2-ethylhexyl) sebacate (69.1 ng/g), triisononyl trimellitate (64.4 ng/g), as well as a few others. Emerging plasticizers were also frequently detected in hand wipes, with a median total level of 4680 ng, indicating potential exposure via hand-to-mouth contact. Several chemicals, including acetyl tributyl citrate, tributyl citrate, di--butyl maleate, isopropyl myristate, and isopropyl palmitate, exhibited significant correlations between dust and hand wipe. However, other plasticizers did not follow this pattern, and the chemical compositional profiles differed between dust and hand wipe, suggesting chemical-specific sources and exposure pathways. Although the estimation of daily intake (EDI) indicated no substantial risks through dust ingestion or hand-to-mouth transfer of emerging plasticizers, continuous monitoring is needed to explore whether some of the important plasticizers are safe replacements or regrettable substitutions of the legacy ones.

摘要

在中国南方的家庭灰尘中,我们总共筛查出了 34 种新兴增塑剂,并与志愿者收集的手部擦拭物(=49 对)相匹配。结果显示,家庭灰尘中经常检测到 27 种新兴增塑剂,其总浓度中位数达到 106700ng/g。其中 13 种在我们的研究之前从未被任何环境研究调查过,包括甘油单油酸酯(中位数:61600ng/g)、油酸甲酯(16400ng/g)、油酸丁酯(411ng/g)、2,2,4-三甲基-1,3-戊二醇单异丁酸酯(341ng/g)、2,2,4-三甲基-1,3-戊二醇二异丁酸酯(105ng/g)、肉豆蔻酸异丙酯(154ng/g)、癸二酸二(2-乙基己基)酯(69.1ng/g)、三异壬基三甲基邻苯二甲酸酯(64.4ng/g)以及其他一些。手部擦拭物中也经常检测到新兴增塑剂,总浓度中位数为 4680ng,表明通过手口接触可能会有潜在的暴露。几种化学物质,包括乙酰基三丁基柠檬酸酯、柠檬酸三丁酯、顺丁烯二酸二丁酯、肉豆蔻酸异丙酯和棕榈酸异丙酯,在灰尘和手部擦拭物之间存在显著相关性。然而,其他增塑剂则没有遵循这种模式,并且灰尘和手部擦拭物之间的化学成分谱不同,这表明存在特定化学物质的来源和暴露途径。尽管通过灰尘摄入或手口转移新兴增塑剂的估计每日摄入量(EDI)表明没有实质性风险,但仍需要进行持续监测,以探讨某些重要的增塑剂是否是传统增塑剂的安全替代品或令人遗憾的替代品。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验