Department of Laboratory Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Cancer Sci. 2022 Nov;113(11):3995-4000. doi: 10.1111/cas.15517. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
In Japan, comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) tests for refractory cancer patients have been approved since June 2019, under the requirement that all cases undergoing CGP tests are annotated by the molecular tumor board (MTB) at each government-designated hospital. To investigate improvement in precision oncology, we evaluated and compared the proportion of cases receiving matched treatments according to CGP results and those recommended to receive genetic counseling at all core hospitals between the first period (11 hospitals, June 2019 to January 2020) and second period (12 hospitals, February 2020 to January 2021). A total of 754 and 2294 cases underwent CGP tests at core hospitals in the first and second periods, respectively; 28 (3.7%) and 176 (7.7%) patients received matched treatments (p < 0.001). Additionally, 25 (3.3%) and 237 (10.3%) cases were recommended to receive genetic counseling in the first and second periods, respectively (p < 0.001). The proportion was associated with the type of CGP test: tumor-only (N = 2391) vs. tumor-normal paired (N = 657) analysis (10.0% vs. 3.5%). These results suggest that recommendations regarding available clinical trials in networked MTBs might contribute to increasing the numbers of matched treatments, and that tumor-normal paired rather than tumor-only tests can increase the efficiency of patient referrals for genetic counseling.
在日本,自 2019 年 6 月以来,针对难治性癌症患者的综合基因组分析(CGP)测试已获得批准,要求所有接受 CGP 测试的病例均由各政府指定医院的分子肿瘤委员会(MTB)进行注释。为了研究精准肿瘤学的改进,我们评估并比较了根据 CGP 结果接受匹配治疗的病例比例,以及建议在所有核心医院接受遗传咨询的病例比例,这些核心医院在第一阶段(11 家医院,2019 年 6 月至 2020 年 1 月)和第二阶段(12 家医院,2020 年 2 月至 2021 年 1 月)各有 754 例和 2294 例病例接受了 CGP 测试。在第一阶段和第二阶段,分别有 28(3.7%)和 176(7.7%)例患者接受了匹配治疗(p<0.001)。此外,在第一阶段和第二阶段,分别有 25(3.3%)和 237(10.3%)例患者被建议接受遗传咨询(p<0.001)。这种比例与 CGP 测试的类型有关:肿瘤分析(N=2391)与肿瘤-正常配对分析(N=657)(10.0% vs. 3.5%)。这些结果表明,网络 MTB 中关于现有临床试验的建议可能有助于增加匹配治疗的数量,并且肿瘤-正常配对分析而非肿瘤分析可以提高患者遗传咨询的效率。