Bradbury Marilyn, Tierney Stephanie
Research and Innovation, Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, WM, UK.
Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX, UK.
J Child Health Care. 2024 Jun;28(2):256-276. doi: 10.1177/13674935221117868. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
Children with physical disabilities are less physically active than children with typical development. How children's experiences of using walkers relates to their physical activity has not been studied previously. This study aimed to explore perspectives of walker use and their potential to increase physical activity. Four focus groups were conducted with children aged 7-10 ( = 3; 12.5%), aged 9-12 ( = 4; 16.7%), parents ( = 7; 29.2%) and paediatric physiotherapists ( = 10; 41.7%). Groups were audio recorded and transcribed. Data were analysed using framework analysis. An overarching concept of walkers needing flexibility to accommodate individual, interpersonal and environmental variability was underpinned by three themes: (a) contrasting drivers for use/non-use of walkers, (b) trade-offs, (c) acceptance of technology within walkers to increase physical activity. Participants were motivated by differing drivers: social for children, emotional for parents and professional for physiotherapists. These contrasting drivers create trade-offs, for example between quality of movement and independence. To maximise physical activity, walker prescribers and designers should prioritise drivers that motivate children and parents, ensuring goal setting is family-centred and participation orientated. Involving families in co-designing walkers is therefore important. Individual clinical assessment allows for identification of children's specific needs and how a child's, parent's and physiotherapist's goals may differ.
身体有残疾的儿童比发育正常的儿童身体活动更少。儿童使用助行器的经历与他们的身体活动之间的关系此前尚未得到研究。本研究旨在探讨使用助行器的观点及其增加身体活动的潜力。对7至10岁的儿童(n = 3;12.5%)、9至12岁的儿童(n = 4;16.7%)、家长(n = 7;29.2%)和儿科物理治疗师(n = 10;41.7%)进行了四个焦点小组访谈。各小组进行了录音和转录。使用框架分析法对数据进行了分析。助行器需要灵活性以适应个体、人际和环境差异这一总体概念由三个主题支撑:(a)使用/不使用助行器的不同驱动因素,(b)权衡,(c)接受助行器中的技术以增加身体活动。参与者受不同驱动因素的激励:儿童受社交因素激励,家长受情感因素激励,物理治疗师受专业因素激励。这些不同的驱动因素会产生权衡,例如在运动质量和独立性之间。为了最大限度地增加身体活动,助行器的开处方者和设计者应优先考虑激励儿童和家长的驱动因素,确保目标设定以家庭为中心且以参与为导向。因此,让家庭参与助行器的共同设计很重要。个体临床评估有助于确定儿童的具体需求以及儿童、家长和物理治疗师的目标可能如何不同。