Clinical Oncology Department, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Experimental Cancer Medicine Team, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Biomarkers. 2022 Dec;27(8):764-772. doi: 10.1080/1354750X.2022.2112614. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
In patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression has been demonstrated to predict response to immunotherapy. It is unclear whether PD-L1 expression measured with currently available validated assays can predict chemotherapy response in patients with non-metastatic TNBC.
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies to assess the PD-L1 expression as a predictor of response to chemotherapy in non-metastatic TNBC using validated assays. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR) rate to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Secondary endpoints included the prevalence of PD-L1 expression in non-metastatic TNBC and its impact on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Moreover, RNA sequence data from the TCGA breast cancer cohort was used to define the relationship between expression and response to chemotherapy and prognosis.
Nineteen studies were eligible for the meta-analysis with a total of 2403 patients with non-metastatic TNBC disease. The PD-L1-positive cohort had a significantly higher likelihood of achieving pCR with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (pooled odds ratio = 1.95; 95% CI = 1.39-2.73, < 0.0001). In studies which reported long-term outcomes, PD-L1 positivity was associated with significantly better DFS and OS compared to PD-L1 negative patients (pooled hazard ratio = 0.51; 95% CI = 0.35-0.74, < 0.0001 and 0.51; 95% CI = 0.27-0.94, = 0.031, respectively). Transcriptomic data suggested that PD-L1 expression is a surrogate marker for the upregulation of key immune-related genes that mediate response to chemotherapy in TNBC.
This analysis clearly shows that patients with PD-L1 positive TNBC respond better to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and are associated with better survival outcomes compared to patients with PD-L1 negative tumours. The newly distinct quadruple negative breast cancer (QNBC) subtype should be defined as the BC subtype with the poorest outcome in the non-metastatic setting, highlighting the need for more aggressive therapy approaches.
在转移性三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)患者中,程序性死亡配体 1(PD-L1)的表达已被证明可预测免疫治疗的反应。目前尚不清楚使用现有经过验证的检测方法测量 PD-L1 表达是否可以预测非转移性 TNBC 患者对化疗的反应。
我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估使用经过验证的检测方法,评估 PD-L1 表达作为非转移性 TNBC 患者对化疗反应的预测指标。主要终点是新辅助化疗的病理完全缓解(pCR)率。次要终点包括非转移性 TNBC 中 PD-L1 表达的流行率及其对无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)的影响。此外,还使用 TCGA 乳腺癌队列的 RNA 序列数据来定义表达与对化疗和预后的反应之间的关系。
19 项研究符合荟萃分析的条件,共有 2403 例非转移性 TNBC 患者。PD-L1 阳性组接受新辅助化疗后实现 pCR 的可能性显著更高(合并优势比=1.95;95%置信区间=1.39-2.73,<0.0001)。在报告长期结果的研究中,与 PD-L1 阴性患者相比,PD-L1 阳性患者的 DFS 和 OS 明显更好(合并风险比=0.51;95%置信区间=0.35-0.74,<0.0001 和 0.51;95%置信区间=0.27-0.94,=0.031)。转录组数据表明,PD-L1 表达是 TNBC 中上调关键免疫相关基因以介导对化疗反应的替代标志物。
这项分析清楚地表明,PD-L1 阳性的 TNBC 患者对新辅助化疗的反应更好,并且与 PD-L1 阴性肿瘤患者相比,生存结局更好。新定义的四重阴性乳腺癌(QNBC)亚型应为非转移性环境中预后最差的 BC 亚型,这突出表明需要更积极的治疗方法。