Callaway Ragan M, Lucero Jacob E, Hierro José L, Lortie C J
Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, USA.
Department of Animal and Range Sciences, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA.
Ecol Lett. 2022 Oct;25(10):2289-2302. doi: 10.1111/ele.14088. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
An important hypothesis for how plants respond to introduction to new ranges is the evolution of increased competitive ability (EICA). EICA predicts that biogeographical release from natural enemies initiates a trade-off in which exotic species in non-native ranges become larger and more competitive, but invest less in consumer defences, relative to populations in native ranges. This trade-off is exceptionally complex because detecting concomitant biogeographical shifts in competitive ability and consumer defence depends upon which traits are targeted, how competition is measured, the defence chemicals quantified, whether defence chemicals do more than defend, whether 'herbivory' is artificial or natural, and where consumers fall on the generalist-specialist spectrum. Previous meta-analyses have successfully identified patterns but have yet to fully disentangle this complexity. We used meta-analysis to reevaluate traditional metrics used to test EICA theory and then expanded on these metrics by partitioning competitive effect and competitive tolerance measures and testing Leaf-Specific Mass in detail as a response trait. Unlike previous syntheses, our meta-analyses detected evidence consistent with the classic trade-off inherent to EICA. Plants from non-native ranges imposed greater competitive effects than plants from native ranges and were less quantitatively defended than plants from native ranges. Our results for defence were not based on complex leaf chemistry, but instead were estimated from tannins, toughness traits and primarily Leaf-Specific Mass. Species specificity occurred but did not influence the general patterns. As for all evidence for EICA-like trade-offs, we do not know if the biogeographical differences we found were caused by trade-offs per se, but they are consistent with predictions derived from the overarching hypothesis. Underestimating physical leaf structure may have contributed to two decades of tepid perspectives on the trade-offs fundamental to EICA.
关于植物如何应对引入新分布范围的一个重要假说是竞争能力增强进化(EICA)。EICA预测,摆脱天敌的生物地理释放引发了一种权衡,即非本土分布范围内的外来物种相对于本土分布范围内的种群变得更大且更具竞争力,但在抵御消费者方面的投入减少。这种权衡异常复杂,因为检测竞争能力和抵御消费者方面伴随的生物地理变化取决于所针对的性状、竞争的衡量方式、防御化学物质的量化、防御化学物质是否具有除防御之外的更多功能、“食草作用”是人工的还是自然的,以及消费者在泛化种 - 特化种光谱上的位置。先前的荟萃分析已成功识别出模式,但尚未完全理清这种复杂性。我们使用荟萃分析重新评估用于检验EICA理论的传统指标,然后通过划分竞争效应和竞争耐受性测量指标并详细测试比叶质量作为响应性状来扩展这些指标。与之前的综合分析不同,我们的荟萃分析检测到了与EICA固有的经典权衡一致的证据。来自非本土分布范围的植物比来自本土分布范围的植物施加了更大的竞争效应,并且在数量上的防御比来自本土分布范围的植物更少。我们关于防御方面的结果并非基于复杂的叶片化学,而是根据单宁、韧性性状以及主要是比叶质量来估计的。物种特异性存在,但并未影响总体模式。对于所有类似EICA权衡的证据,我们不知道我们发现的生物地理差异是否本身就是由权衡导致的,但它们与从总体假说得出的预测一致。对叶片物理结构的低估可能导致了二十年来对EICA基本权衡的平淡看法。