Suppr超能文献

COVID-19 住院患者中标准剂量与灵活剂量肝素预防血栓:一项目标试验模拟。

Thromboprophylaxis with standard-dose vs. flexible-dose heparin for hospitalized COVID-19 patients: a target trial emulation.

机构信息

CAUSALab, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

National Center of Epidemiology, Carlos III Health Institute, 28029 Madrid, Spain; Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Nov;151:96-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.08.006. Epub 2022 Aug 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare mortality of hospitalized COVID-19 patients under two low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) thromboprophylaxis strategies: standard dose and variable dose (standard dose increased to intermediate dose in the presence of laboratory abnormalities indicating an increased thrombosis risk).

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

Target trial emulation using observational data from 2,613 adults admitted with a COVID-19 diagnosis in Madrid, Spain between March 16 and April 15, 2020.

RESULTS

A total of 1,284 patients were eligible. Among 503 patients without increased baseline thrombotic risk, 28-day mortality risk (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 9.0% (6.6, 11.7) under the standard dose strategy and 5.6% (3.3, 8.3) under the variable dose strategy; risk difference 3.4% (95% CI: -0.24, 6.9); mortality hazard ratio 1.61 (95% CI: 0.97, 2.89). Among 781 patients with increased baseline thrombotic risk, the 28-day mortality risk was 25.8% (22.7, 29.0) under the standard dose strategy and 18.1% (9.3, 28.9) under the intermediate dose strategy; risk difference 7.7% (95% CI: -3.5, 17.2); mortality hazard ratio 1.45 (95% CI: 0.81, 3.17). Major bleeding and LMWH-induced coagulopathy were rare under all strategies.

CONCLUSION

Escalating anticoagulation intensity after signs of thrombosis risk may increase the survival of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. However, effect estimates were imprecise and additional studies are warranted.

摘要

目的

比较 COVID-19 住院患者接受两种低分子肝素(LMWH)预防血栓形成策略的死亡率:标准剂量和可变剂量(存在提示血栓形成风险增加的实验室异常时,将标准剂量增加至中等剂量)。

研究设计和设置

使用 2020 年 3 月 16 日至 4 月 15 日期间在西班牙马德里因 COVID-19 住院的 2613 名成年人的观察数据进行目标试验模拟。

结果

共有 1284 名患者符合条件。在 503 名没有基线血栓形成风险增加的患者中,标准剂量策略下 28 天死亡率风险(95%置信区间 [CI])为 9.0%(6.6,11.7),而可变剂量策略下为 5.6%(3.3,8.3);风险差异为 3.4%(95%CI:-0.24,6.9);死亡率风险比为 1.61(95%CI:0.97,2.89)。在 781 名基线血栓形成风险增加的患者中,标准剂量策略下 28 天死亡率风险为 25.8%(22.7,29.0),中间剂量策略下为 18.1%(9.3,28.9);风险差异为 7.7%(95%CI:-3.5,17.2);死亡率风险比为 1.45(95%CI:0.81,3.17)。在所有策略下,大出血和 LMWH 诱导的凝血障碍均很少见。

结论

在出现血栓形成风险迹象后增加抗凝强度可能会提高 COVID-19 住院患者的生存率。然而,效果估计不精确,需要进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f10c/9385269/f0985b156ecc/gr1_lrg.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验