Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Pathology. 2022 Dec;54(7):863-873. doi: 10.1016/j.pathol.2022.05.012. Epub 2022 Jul 31.
High expression of PRAME (PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma) and p53 (a proposed marker of desmoplastic melanoma) and low expression of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5-hmC) have each been reported in melanoma. However, their combined diagnostic utility for distinguishing melanomas, including uncommon variants, from histological mimics is unknown. This study sought to determine the utility of PRAME, p53 and 5-hmC immunostains for diagnosing melanocytic tumours. A total of 333 cutaneous melanocytic tumours (melanoma n=280, naevi n=53), 20 cutaneous neurofibromas, and 15 scars were evaluated using multiplex immunofluorescence (n=313) or single-plex chromogenic immunohistochemical staining (n=55). Immunostaining for PRAME and 5-hmC were each scored using a previously described semiquantitative scale 0 (absent) to 4+ (diffuse). p53 was scored using a previously described immunoreactive score (range 0-300). PRAME expression was significantly higher in melanomas than in naevi (p<0.0001), with the lowest PRAME expression found in low-grade desmoplastic melanomas compared to the other melanoma subtypes. In non-desmoplastic melanomas, 38% showed 4+ staining (>75% positive tumour cells) and 70% showed 3+ or 4+(>50% positive tumour cells). Conversely, 96% of naevi showed 0, 1+ or 2+ expression. 5-hmC expression was significantly lower in melanomas than in naevi (p<0.0001). However, acral melanomas were not significantly associated with loss of 5-hmC expression (p=0.84). Compared with using PRAME in isolation, combining PRAME and 5-hmC scores increased sensitivity (64%-84%) for detecting melanoma. With respect to desmoplastic melanoma compared to scar or neurofibroma, strong PRAME or p53 staining were almost exclusively found in high-grade desmoplastic melanomas; low-grade desmoplastic melanomas, neurofibromas and scars were negative. 5-hmC was not useful in distinguishing desmoplastic melanomas from neurofibromas or scars. Our data support the use of PRAME as a highly specific ancillary investigation in the diagnosis of melanoma, however PRAME should be considered 'positive' if there is 3+ or 4+ staining (rather than the widely recommended 4+ threshold). 5-hmC, PRAME and p53 appear to have a limited role in the diagnosis of low-grade desmoplastic melanomas.
高表达 PRAME(黑色素瘤中优先表达的抗原)和 p53(一种推测的促结缔组织增生性黑色素瘤标志物)以及低表达 5-羟甲基胞嘧啶(5-hmC)在黑色素瘤中均有报道。然而,它们联合用于诊断黑色素瘤(包括罕见变体)与组织学模拟物的组合诊断效用尚不清楚。本研究旨在确定 PRAME、p53 和 5-hmC 免疫染色在诊断黑素细胞肿瘤中的效用。共评估了 333 例皮肤黑素细胞肿瘤(黑色素瘤 n=280,痣 n=53)、20 例皮肤神经纤维瘤和 15 例疤痕,使用多聚免疫荧光(n=313)或单聚色免疫组织化学染色(n=55)。使用先前描述的半定量评分 0(缺失)至 4+(弥漫)对 PRAME 和 5-hmC 免疫染色进行评分。使用先前描述的免疫反应性评分(范围 0-300)对 p53 进行评分。PRAME 表达在黑色素瘤中明显高于痣(p<0.0001),与其他黑色素瘤亚型相比,低级别促结缔组织增生性黑色素瘤中 PRAME 表达最低。在非促结缔组织增生性黑色素瘤中,38%表现出 4+染色(>75%阳性肿瘤细胞),70%表现出 3+或 4+(>50%阳性肿瘤细胞)。相反,96%的痣表现为 0、1+或 2+表达。黑色素瘤中 5-hmC 的表达明显低于痣(p<0.0001)。然而,肢端黑色素瘤与 5-hmC 表达缺失无显著相关性(p=0.84)。与单独使用 PRAME 相比,联合 PRAME 和 5-hmC 评分提高了检测黑色素瘤的敏感性(64%-84%)。与疤痕或神经纤维瘤相比,与高级别促结缔组织增生性黑色素瘤相比,强 PRAME 或 p53 染色几乎仅见于高级别促结缔组织增生性黑色素瘤;低级别促结缔组织增生性黑色素瘤、神经纤维瘤和疤痕均为阴性。5-hmC 对于区分促结缔组织增生性黑色素瘤与神经纤维瘤或疤痕无帮助。我们的数据支持将 PRAME 作为黑色素瘤诊断的高度特异性辅助检查,然而,如果存在 3+或 4+染色(而不是广泛推荐的 4+阈值),则应将 PRAME 视为“阳性”。5-hmC、PRAME 和 p53 在诊断低级别促结缔组织增生性黑色素瘤方面似乎作用有限。