Zavala Nicolas A, Knoebel Randall W, Anitescu Magdalena
Department of Anesthesiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL, United States.
Department of Pharmacy, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 4;3:878985. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2022.878985. eCollection 2022.
In this study, we aim to evaluate the efficacy of adjunctive lidocaine and ketamine infusions for opioid reduction in the treatment of sickle cell disease in patients with vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC).
We retrospectively reviewed a cohort of 330 adult sickle-cell crisis hospital encounters with 68 patients admitted to our institution from July 2017 to August 2018.
Upon institutional IRB approval, we obtained initial data from billing records and performed chart reviews to obtain pain scores and confirm total opioid consumption. If provided by the acute pain consultation service, the patients received either a lidocaine or a ketamine infusion of 0.5-2 mg/min or 2-3 mcg/kg, respectively, for a maximum of 24-48 h. We compared the change in opioid consumption before and after infusion therapy to patients that did not receive ketamine or lidocaine.
Compared to patients that did not receive infusion therapy, ketamine and lidocaine accounted for respective relative decreases of 28 and 23% in average daily morphine consumption ( = 0.02). Patients that received either infusion were 3 to 4 times more likely to decrease their opioid consumption independent of treatment length or baseline opioid doses ( < 0.01). Ketamine and lidocaine therapies were not associated with change in pain scores. When a patient had multiple admissions, opioid reduction was strongly correlated with initiation of infusions in the later visits.
Both ketamine and lidocaine infusion therapies are effective in reducing opioid consumption for patients with vaso-occlusive crisis. Lidocaine infusion is emerging as an agent for stabilizing opioid doses in VOC for patients with high daily MME.
在本研究中,我们旨在评估辅助使用利多卡因和氯胺酮输注以减少阿片类药物用量在治疗血管闭塞性危机(VOC)的镰状细胞病患者中的疗效。
我们回顾性分析了2017年7月至2018年8月期间我院收治的68例成年镰状细胞危机患者的330次住院情况。
经机构审查委员会(IRB)批准后,我们从计费记录中获取初始数据,并进行病历审查以获得疼痛评分并确认阿片类药物的总消耗量。如果由急性疼痛咨询服务提供,患者分别接受0.5 - 2mg/分钟的利多卡因或2 - 3mcg/kg的氯胺酮输注,最长持续24 - 48小时。我们将接受输注治疗前后阿片类药物消耗量的变化与未接受氯胺酮或利多卡因治疗的患者进行比较。
与未接受输注治疗的患者相比,氯胺酮和利多卡因使平均每日吗啡消耗量分别相对降低了28%和23%(P = 0.02)。接受任何一种输注治疗的患者减少阿片类药物用量的可能性是未接受治疗患者的3至4倍,且与治疗时长或基线阿片类药物剂量无关(P < 0.01)。氯胺酮和利多卡因治疗与疼痛评分的变化无关。当患者多次入院时,后期就诊时开始输注与阿片类药物用量减少密切相关。
氯胺酮和利多卡因输注疗法均能有效减少血管闭塞性危机患者的阿片类药物用量。对于每日吗啡毫克当量(MME)较高的VOC患者,利多卡因输注正逐渐成为一种稳定阿片类药物剂量的药物。