Suppr超能文献

用于成年人心血管疾病一级预防的他汀类药物:美国预防服务工作组的更新证据报告和系统评价。

Statin Use for the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Adults: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

机构信息

Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.

Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.

出版信息

JAMA. 2022 Aug 23;328(8):754-771. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.12138.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

A 2016 review for the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) found use of statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) was associated with reduced mortality and cardiovascular outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To update the 2016 review on statins for primary prevention of CVD to inform the USPSTF.

DATA SOURCES

Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (to November 2021); surveillance through May 20, 2022.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized clinical trials on statins vs placebo or no statin and statin intensity in adults without prior cardiovascular events; large cohort studies on harms.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

One investigator abstracted data; a second checked accuracy. Two investigators independently rated study quality.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

All-cause and cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, composite cardiovascular outcomes, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies were included: 22 trials (N = 90 624) with 6 months to 6 years of follow-up compared statins vs placebo or no statin, 1 trial (n = 5144) compared statin intensities, and 3 observational studies (n = 417 523) reported harms. Statins were significantly associated with decreased risk of all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR], 0.92 [95% CI, 0.87 to 0.98]; absolute risk difference [ARD], -0.35% [95% CI, -0.57% to -0.14%]), stroke (RR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.68 to 0.90]; ARD, -0.39% [95% CI, -0.54% to -0.25%]), myocardial infarction (RR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.60 to 0.75]; ARD, -0.85% [95% CI, -1.22% to -0.47%]), and composite cardiovascular outcomes (RR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.64 to 0.81]; ARD, -1.28% [95% CI, -1.61% to -0.95%]); the association with cardiovascular mortality was not statistically significant (RR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.81 to 1.02]; ARD, -0.13%). Relative benefits were consistent in groups defined by demographic and clinical characteristics, although data for persons older than 75 years were sparse. Statin therapy was not significantly associated with increased risk of serious adverse events (RR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.93 to 1.01]), myalgias (RR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.86 to 1.11]), or elevated alanine aminotransferase level (RR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.78 to 1.13]). Statin therapy was not significantly associated with increased diabetes risk overall (RR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.92 to 1.19]), although 1 trial found high-intensity statin therapy was significantly associated with increased risk (RR, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.05 to 1.49]). Otherwise, there were no clear differences in outcomes based on statin intensity.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In adults at increased CVD risk but without prior CVD events, statin therapy for primary prevention of CVD was associated with reduced risk of all-cause mortality and CVD events. Benefits of statin therapy appear to be present across diverse demographic and clinical populations, with consistent relative benefits in groups defined by demographic and clinical characteristics.

摘要

重要性

2016 年美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)的一项审查发现,使用他汀类药物进行心血管疾病(CVD)的一级预防与死亡率和心血管结局的降低相关。

目的

更新 2016 年关于他汀类药物用于 CVD 一级预防的综述,为 USPSTF 提供信息。

数据来源

Ovid MEDLINE、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库和 Cochrane 系统评价数据库(截至 2021 年 11 月);2022 年 5 月 20 日之前的监测。

研究选择

随机临床试验,比较他汀类药物与安慰剂或无他汀类药物以及他汀类药物强度在无先前心血管事件的成年人中的应用;大型队列研究报告危害。

数据提取和综合

一名调查员提取数据;第二名调查员检查准确性。两名调查员独立评估研究质量。

主要结果和措施

包括 26 项研究:22 项试验(N=90624),随访时间 6 个月至 6 年,比较他汀类药物与安慰剂或无他汀类药物,1 项试验(n=5144)比较他汀类药物强度,3 项观察性研究(n=417523)报告危害。他汀类药物显著降低全因死亡率(风险比[RR],0.92[95%CI,0.87 至 0.98];绝对风险差异[ARD],-0.35%[95%CI,-0.57% 至-0.14%])、中风(RR,0.78[95%CI,0.68 至 0.90];ARD,-0.39%[95%CI,-0.54% 至-0.25%])、心肌梗死(RR,0.67[95%CI,0.60 至 0.75];ARD,-0.85%[95%CI,-1.22% 至-0.47%])和复合心血管结局(RR,0.72[95%CI,0.64 至 0.81];ARD,-1.28%[95%CI,-1.61% 至-0.95%]);与心血管死亡率的相关性无统计学意义(RR,0.91[95%CI,0.81 至 1.02];ARD,-0.13%)。在按人口统计学和临床特征定义的组中,相对获益是一致的,尽管 75 岁以上人群的数据很少。他汀类药物治疗与严重不良事件风险增加无关(RR,0.97[95%CI,0.93 至 1.01])、肌痛(RR,0.98[95%CI,0.86 至 1.11])或丙氨酸氨基转移酶水平升高(RR,0.94[95%CI,0.78 至 1.13])。他汀类药物治疗与总体糖尿病风险增加无关(RR,1.04[95%CI,0.92 至 1.19]),尽管 1 项试验发现高强度他汀类药物治疗与风险增加显著相关(RR,1.25[95%CI,1.05 至 1.49])。否则,基于他汀类药物强度的结果没有明显差异。

结论和相关性

在 CVD 风险增加但无先前 CVD 事件的成年人中,他汀类药物用于 CVD 的一级预防与全因死亡率和 CVD 事件风险降低相关。他汀类药物治疗的益处似乎存在于不同的人口统计学和临床人群中,在按人口统计学和临床特征定义的组中具有一致的相对益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验