• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

游离功能股薄肌移植治疗成人创伤性全臂丛神经损伤后的屈肘力量如何?

What is the Elbow Flexion Strength After Free Functional Gracilis Muscle Transfer for Adult Traumatic Complete Brachial Plexus Injuries?

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Dec 1;480(12):2392-2405. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002311. Epub 2022 Aug 24.

DOI:10.1097/CORR.0000000000002311
PMID:36001032
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9653183/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Traumatic brachial plexus injuries (BPIs) in the nerve roots of C5 to T1 lead to the devastating loss of motor and sensory function in the upper extremity. Free functional gracilis muscle transfer (FFMT) is used to reconstruct elbow and shoulder function in adults with traumatic complete BPIs. The question is whether the gains in ROM and functionality for the patient outweigh the risks of such a large intervention to justify this surgery in these patients.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) After FFMT for adult traumatic complete BPI, what is the functional recovery in terms of elbow flexion, shoulder abduction, and wrist extension (ROM and muscle grade)? (2) Does the choice of distal insertion affect the functional recovery of the elbow, shoulder, and wrist? (3) Does the choice of nerve source affect elbow flexion and shoulder abduction recovery? (4) What factors are associated with less residual disability? (5) What proportion of flaps have necrosis and do not reinnervate?

METHODS

We performed a retrospective observational study at Dr. Soetomo General Hospital in Surabaya, Indonesia. A total of 180 patients with traumatic BPIs were treated with FFMT between 2010 and 2020, performed by a senior orthopaedic hand surgeon with 14 years of experience in FFMT. We included patients with traumatic complete C5 to T1 BPIs who underwent a gracilis FFMT procedure. Indications were total avulsion injuries and delayed presentation (>6 months after trauma) or after failed primary nerve transfers (>12 months). Patients with less than 12 months of follow-up were excluded, leaving 130 patients eligible for this study. The median postoperative follow-up period was 47 months (interquartile range [IQR] 33 to 66 months). Most were men (86%; 112 of 130) who had motorcycle collisions (96%; 125 patients) and a median age of 23 years (IQR 19 to 34 years). Orthopaedic surgeons and residents measured joint function at the elbow (flexion), shoulder (abduction), and wrist (extension) in terms of British Medical Research Council (MRC) muscle strength scores and active ROM. A univariate analysis of variance test was used to evaluate these outcomes in terms of differences in distal attachment to the extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB), extensor digitorum communis and extensor pollicis longus (EDC/EPL), the flexor digitorum profundus and flexor pollicis longus (FDP/FPL), and the choice of a phrenic, accessory, or intercostal nerve source. We measured postoperative function with the DASH score and pain at rest with the VAS score. A multivariate linear regression analysis was performed to investigate what patient and injury factors were associated with less disability. Complications such as flap necrosis, innervation problems, infections, and reoperations were evaluated.

RESULTS

The median elbow flexion muscle strength was 3 (IQR 3 to 4) and active ROM was 88° ± 46°. The median shoulder abduction grade was 3 (IQR 2 to 4) and active ROM was 62° ± 42°. However, the choice of distal insertion was not associated with differences in the median wrist extension strength (ECRB: 2 [IQR 0 to 3], EDC/EPL: 2 [IQR 0 to 3], FDP/FPL: 1 [IQR 0 to 2]; p = 0.44) or in ROM (ECRB: 21° ± 19°, EDC/EPL: 21° ± 14°, FDP/FPL: 13° ± 15°; p = 0.69). Furthermore, the choice of nerve source did not affect the mean ROM for elbow flexion (phrenic nerve: 87° ± 46°; accessory nerve: 106° ± 49°; intercostal nerves: 103° ± 50°; p = 0.55). No associations were found with less disability (lower DASH scores): young age (coefficient = 0.28; 95% CI -0.22 to 0.79; p = 0.27), being a woman (coefficient = -9.4; 95% CI -24 to 5.3; p = 0.20), and more postoperative months (coefficient = 0.02; 95% CI -0.01 to 0.05]; p = 0.13). The mean postoperative VAS score for pain at rest was 3 ± 2. Flap necrosis occurred in 5% (seven of 130) of all patients, and failed innervation of the gracilis muscle occurred in 4% (five patients).

CONCLUSION

FFMT achieves ROM with fair-to-good muscle power of elbow flexion, shoulder abduction, and overall function for the patient, but does not achieve good wrist function. Meticulous microsurgical skills and extensive rehabilitation training are needed to maximize the result of FFMT. Further technical developments in distal attachment and additional nerve procedures will pave the way for reconstructing a functional limb in patients with a flail upper extremity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

摘要

背景

C5 到 T1 神经根的创伤性臂丛神经损伤导致上肢运动和感觉功能严重丧失。游离功能性股薄肌转移(FFMT)用于重建成人创伤性完全臂丛神经损伤的肘部和肩部功能。问题是,对于这些患者,这种大干预的 ROM 和功能增益是否超过了风险,从而证明这种手术是合理的。

问题/目的:(1)成人创伤性完全 BPI 行 FFMT 后,肘部屈曲、肩部外展和腕关节伸展的功能恢复情况如何(ROM 和肌肉等级)?(2)远端附着点的选择是否会影响肘部、肩部和腕部的功能恢复?(3)神经源的选择是否会影响屈肘和肩外展的恢复?(4)哪些因素与残余残疾程度较低相关?(5)有多少比例的皮瓣坏死且无法重新支配?

方法

我们在印度尼西亚泗水的苏腊巴亚(Soetomo)综合医院进行了一项回顾性观察性研究。2010 年至 2020 年期间,共有 180 例创伤性臂丛神经损伤患者接受了 FFMT,由一位具有 14 年 FFMT 经验的资深骨科手外科医生进行。我们纳入了创伤性 C5 到 T1 完全臂丛神经损伤且接受股薄肌 FFMT 手术的患者。适应证为完全撕脱伤和延迟出现(创伤后>6 个月)或初次神经转移失败(>12 个月)。排除了随访时间少于 12 个月的患者,共 130 例患者符合本研究条件。中位术后随访时间为 47 个月(四分位距[IQR]33 至 66 个月)。大多数患者为男性(86%;112/130),均因摩托车事故受伤(96%;125 例),中位年龄为 23 岁(IQR 19 至 34 岁)。矫形外科医生和住院医师根据英国医学研究委员会(MRC)肌肉力量评分和主动 ROM 评估肘部(屈曲)、肩部(外展)和腕部(伸展)的关节功能。使用单因素方差分析检验来评估远端附着于桡侧腕短伸肌(ECRB)、指总伸肌和拇长伸肌(EDC/EPL)、指深屈肌和拇长屈肌(FDP/FPL)以及膈神经、副神经或肋间神经源选择的差异。我们使用 DASH 评分测量术后功能,使用 VAS 评分测量休息时的疼痛。进行多元线性回归分析,以探讨哪些患者和损伤因素与残疾程度较低相关。评估并发症,如皮瓣坏死、神经支配问题、感染和再手术。

结果

中位肘部屈曲肌肉力量为 3(IQR 3 至 4),主动 ROM 为 88°±46°。中位肩部外展肌力为 3(IQR 2 至 4),主动 ROM 为 62°±42°。然而,远端插入点的选择与中位腕关节伸展力量(ECRB:2[IQR 0 至 3]、EDC/EPL:2[IQR 0 至 3]、FDP/FPL:1[IQR 0 至 2])或 ROM(ECRB:21°±19°、EDC/EPL:21°±14°、FDP/FPL:13°±15°)均无差异(p=0.44)。此外,神经源的选择也不影响屈肘的平均 ROM(膈神经:87°±46°;副神经:106°±49°;肋间神经:103°±50°;p=0.55)。与较低的残疾程度(较低的 DASH 评分)无关联:年轻(系数=0.28;95%CI-0.22 至 0.79;p=0.27)、女性(系数=-9.4;95%CI-24 至 5.3;p=0.20)、术后时间更长(系数=0.02;95%CI-0.01 至 0.05;p=0.13)。中位术后休息时 VAS 评分疼痛为 3±2。所有患者中有 5%(7/130)出现皮瓣坏死,4%(5 例)出现股薄肌神经支配失败。

结论

FFMT 实现了 ROM,肘部屈曲、肩部外展和整体功能的肌肉力量为患者提供了良好到尚可的效果,但腕关节功能不佳。需要精细的显微外科技能和广泛的康复训练,以最大限度地提高 FFMT 的效果。远端附着点和附加神经手术的进一步技术发展将为上肢瘫痪患者重建功能性肢体铺平道路。

证据水平

III 级,治疗性研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a8/9653183/5972d4fa4d5f/abjs-480-2392-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a8/9653183/1fbc5a31c987/abjs-480-2392-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a8/9653183/b7c8f47fea59/abjs-480-2392-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a8/9653183/fbb46c68c074/abjs-480-2392-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a8/9653183/8dac63e4d45b/abjs-480-2392-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a8/9653183/15baf67d9e9c/abjs-480-2392-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a8/9653183/5972d4fa4d5f/abjs-480-2392-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a8/9653183/1fbc5a31c987/abjs-480-2392-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a8/9653183/b7c8f47fea59/abjs-480-2392-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a8/9653183/fbb46c68c074/abjs-480-2392-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a8/9653183/8dac63e4d45b/abjs-480-2392-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a8/9653183/15baf67d9e9c/abjs-480-2392-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a8/9653183/5972d4fa4d5f/abjs-480-2392-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
What is the Elbow Flexion Strength After Free Functional Gracilis Muscle Transfer for Adult Traumatic Complete Brachial Plexus Injuries?游离功能股薄肌移植治疗成人创伤性全臂丛神经损伤后的屈肘力量如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Dec 1;480(12):2392-2405. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002311. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
2
Free Functioning Gracilis Muscle Transfer With and Without Simultaneous Intercostal Nerve Transfer to Musculocutaneous Nerve for Restoration of Elbow Flexion After Traumatic Adult Brachial Pan-Plexus Injury.创伤性成人臂丛全瘫后采用带或不带肋间神经同时转移至肌皮神经的游离功能性股薄肌转移术恢复肘关节屈曲功能
J Hand Surg Am. 2017 Apr;42(4):293.e1-293.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.01.014. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
3
Donor nerve sources in free functional gracilis muscle transfer for elbow flexion in adult brachial plexus injury.成人臂丛神经损伤时用于屈肘的游离功能性股薄肌转移术中的供体神经来源
Microsurgery. 2017 Jul;37(5):377-382. doi: 10.1002/micr.30120. Epub 2016 Oct 5.
4
Free Functioning Gracilis Muscle Transfer versus Intercostal Nerve Transfer to Musculocutaneous Nerve for Restoration of Elbow Flexion after Traumatic Adult Brachial Pan-Plexus Injury.游离功能性股薄肌转移术与肋间神经转移至肌皮神经术治疗成人创伤性臂丛神经全损伤后肘关节屈曲功能恢复的比较
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Sep;138(3):483e-488e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002471.
5
Outcomes of Functioning Free Gracilis Muscle Transplantation to Restore Elbow Flexion in Late Brachial Plexus Birth Injury.游离股薄肌移植修复晚期臂丛神经产伤致肘关节屈曲功能的疗效
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2023 Jun;39(5):361-366. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1757750. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
6
Gracilis free muscle transfer for restoration of function after complete brachial plexus avulsion.股薄肌游离肌转移用于完全性臂丛神经撕脱伤后功能的恢复。
Neurosurg Focus. 2004 May 15;16(5):E8. doi: 10.3171/foc.2004.16.5.9.
7
Free Functioning Gracilis Muscle Transfer for Elbow Flexion Reconstruction after Traumatic Adult Brachial Pan-Plexus Injury: Where Is the Optimal Distal Tendon Attachment for Elbow Flexion?游离功能性股薄肌转移用于创伤性成人臂丛全损伤后肘关节屈曲重建:肘关节屈曲的最佳远端肌腱附着位置在哪里?
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Jan;139(1):128-136. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002864.
8
Outcomes of gracilis free-flap muscle transfers and non-free-flap procedures for restoration of elbow flexion: A systematic review.股薄肌游离皮瓣转移与非游离皮瓣手术修复肘部屈肌功能的效果比较:一项系统综述。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022 Aug;75(8):2625-2636. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2022.04.025. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
9
Management of Adult Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injury.成人创伤性臂丛神经损伤的治疗。
Mymensingh Med J. 2023 Apr;32(2):437-447.
10
Comparison between donor nerves to motorize the free functional gracilis muscle transfer for elbow flexion: Retrospective study of 38 consecutive cases in traumatic adult brachial plexus injuries.对比用于驱动游离功能股薄肌移位以实现肘部屈曲的供体神经:创伤性成人臂丛神经损伤中 38 例连续病例的回顾性研究。
Microsurgery. 2019 Jul;39(5):400-404. doi: 10.1002/micr.30426. Epub 2019 Jan 22.

引用本文的文献

1
CORR Insights®: What is the Elbow Flexion Strength After Free Functional Gracilis Muscle Transfer for Adult Traumatic Complete Brachial Plexus Injuries?CORR见解®:成人创伤性完全性臂丛神经损伤行游离功能性股薄肌转移术后的肘屈曲力量如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Dec 1;480(12):2406-2408. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002407. Epub 2022 Sep 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Outcome of free gracilis muscle transfer for the restoration of elbow flexion in traumatic brachial plexus palsy.游离股薄肌移植重建创伤性臂丛神经损伤后肘部屈肌功能的疗效。
Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2021;32(3):633-641. doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2021.225. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
2
Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injury in Indonesia: An Experience from a Developing Country.印度尼西亚创伤性臂丛神经损伤:来自发展中国家的经验。
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2022 Sep;38(7):511-523. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1735507. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
3
Functioning Free Muscle Transfer for Brachial Plexus Injury: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis Comparing Functional Outcomes of Intercostal Nerve and Spinal Accessory Nerve Grafts.
用于臂丛神经损伤的功能性游离肌肉移植:一项比较肋间神经和副神经移植功能结果的系统评价和汇总分析
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2020 Oct;36(8):567-571. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1713147. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
4
Current Procedure of Double Free Muscle Transfer for Traumatic Total Brachial Plexus Palsy.创伤性全臂丛神经麻痹的双游离肌肉转移现行手术方法
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2013 Aug 28;3(3):e16. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.M.00010. eCollection 2014 Sep.
5
Systematic review on outcome of free functioning muscle transfers for elbow flexion in brachial plexus injuries.臂丛神经损伤中游离功能性肌肉转移用于肘关节屈曲效果的系统评价
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2019 Jul;44(6):620-627. doi: 10.1177/1753193419825527. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
6
Timing of surgery in traumatic brachial plexus injury: a systematic review.创伤性臂丛神经损伤的手术时机:一项系统评价
J Neurosurg. 2018 Jun 1;130(4):1333-1345. doi: 10.3171/2018.1.JNS172068. Print 2019 Apr 1.
7
Free functioning gracilis transfer for reanimation of elbow and hand in total traumatic brachial plexopathy in children.游离功能性股薄肌转移术用于儿童完全性创伤性臂丛神经病变时肘部和手部的功能重建
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2018 Jul;43(6):596-608. doi: 10.1177/1753193418762950. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
8
Nerve transfer versus muscle transfer to restore elbow flexion after pan-brachial plexus injury: a cost-effectiveness analysis.神经转移与肌肉转移在全臂丛神经损伤后恢复肘部弯曲的比较:成本效益分析。
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Jul;43(1):E4. doi: 10.3171/2017.4.FOCUS17112.
9
Outcome after brachial plexus injury surgery and impact on quality of life.臂丛神经损伤手术后的结果及其对生活质量的影响。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2017 Jul;159(7):1257-1264. doi: 10.1007/s00701-017-3205-1. Epub 2017 May 24.
10
Free Functioning Gracilis Muscle Transfer for Elbow Flexion Reconstruction after Traumatic Adult Brachial Pan-Plexus Injury: Where Is the Optimal Distal Tendon Attachment for Elbow Flexion?游离功能性股薄肌转移用于创伤性成人臂丛全损伤后肘关节屈曲重建:肘关节屈曲的最佳远端肌腱附着位置在哪里?
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Jan;139(1):128-136. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002864.