Suppr超能文献

糖尿病健康计划是否对经济资源较少的受益人群的药物依从性产生差异影响?

Does the diabetes health plan have a differential impact on medication adherence among beneficiaries with fewer financial resources?

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.

Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.

出版信息

J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Sep;28(9):948-957. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.9.948.

Abstract

The Diabetes Health Plan (DHP), a value-based insurance plan that reduces cost sharing, was previously shown to modestly increase employer-level medication adherence. It is unclear how the DHP might impact individuals with different incomes. To examine the impact of the DHP on individual-level medication adherence, by income level. This is a retrospective, quasiexperimental study. An employer-level propensity score match was done to identify suitable control employers, followed by individual-level propensity score weighing. These weights were applied to difference-in-difference models examining the effect of the DHP and the effect of income on changes in adherence to metformin, statins, and angiotensin-converting enzymes/angiotensin receptor blockers. The weights were then applied to a differences-in-differences-in-differences model to estimate the differential impact of DHP status on changes in adherence by income group. The study population included 2,065 beneficiaries with DHP and 17,704 matched controls. There were no significant differences in changes to adherence for any medications between beneficiaries enrolled in the DHP vs standard plans. However, adherence to all medications was higher among those with incomes greater than $75,000 (year 1: metformin: +7.3 percentage points; statin +4.3 percentage points; angiotensin-converting enzymes/angiotensin receptor blockers: +6.2 percentage points; < 0.01) compared with those with incomes less than $50,000. The differences-in-differences-in-differences term examining the impact of income on the DHP effect was not significant for any comparisons. We did not find significant associations between the DHP and changes in individual-level medication adherence, even for low-income beneficiaries. New strategies to improve consumer engagement may be needed to translate value-based insurance designs into changes in patient behavior. Drs Ettner and Moin received grants from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (Principal Investigator: Carol Mangione). Mr Luchs received support for attending meetings and/or travel (minimal-mileage and hotel on 2 occasions). Mr Chan has an employee benefit to purchase stock for UnitedHealth Group.

摘要

糖尿病健康计划 (DHP) 是一种基于价值的保险计划,可降低成本分担,此前已被证明可适度提高雇主层面的药物依从性。但尚不清楚 DHP 对不同收入人群的影响。本研究旨在按收入水平检验 DHP 对个人药物依从性的影响。

这是一项回顾性、准实验研究。采用雇主层面倾向得分匹配来确定合适的对照雇主,然后进行个体层面倾向得分加权。将这些权重应用于差异对差异模型中,以检验 DHP 的影响以及收入对二甲双胍、他汀类药物和血管紧张素转换酶/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂依从性变化的影响。然后将权重应用于差异对差异对差异模型中,以估计 DHP 状况对不同收入组依从性变化的差异影响。

研究人群包括 2065 名参加 DHP 的受益人和 17704 名匹配对照者。与参加标准计划的受益人相比,参加 DHP 的受益人的任何药物的依从性变化均无显著差异。然而,收入超过 75000 美元的患者(第一年:二甲双胍:+7.3 个百分点;他汀类药物:+4.3 个百分点;血管紧张素转换酶/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂:+6.2 个百分点;<0.01)的所有药物的依从性均高于收入低于 50000 美元的患者。考察收入对 DHP 效果影响的差异对差异对差异项在任何比较中均无显著意义。

我们未发现 DHP 与个体药物依从性变化之间存在显著关联,即使是对低收入受益人群也是如此。可能需要采取新的策略来提高消费者的参与度,以将基于价值的保险设计转化为患者行为的改变。Ettner 博士和 Moin 博士获得了疾病控制与预防中心和国家糖尿病、消化和肾脏疾病研究所的资助(首席研究员:Carol Mangione)。Luchs 先生获得了参加会议和/或差旅的支持(仅在 2 次会议时的最低里程和酒店)。Chan 先生拥有一项为联合健康集团购买股票的员工福利。

相似文献

2
Adherence to Metformin, Statins, and ACE/ARBs Within the Diabetes Health Plan (DHP).
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Nov;30(11):1645-50. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3284-8. Epub 2015 May 6.
4
The diabetes health plan and medication adherence among individuals with low incomes.
Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec;57 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):214-221. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13992. Epub 2022 May 2.
5
The Diabetes Health Plan and Healthcare Utilization Among Beneficiaries with Low Incomes.
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 May;38(7):1672-1680. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07903-9. Epub 2022 Nov 16.
6
Comprehensive Medication Management and Medication Adherence for Chronic Conditions.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Jan;22(1):56-62. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.1.56.
9
Identifying adherent patients to newly initiated statins using previous adherence to chronic medications.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Feb;27(2):186-197. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.2.186.

引用本文的文献

1
The Diabetes Health Plan and Healthcare Utilization Among Beneficiaries with Low Incomes.
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 May;38(7):1672-1680. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07903-9. Epub 2022 Nov 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Utilization Impact of Cost-Sharing Elimination for Preventive Care Services: A Rapid Review.
Med Care Res Rev. 2022 Apr;79(2):175-197. doi: 10.1177/10775587211027372. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
3
Comparison of Discounted and Undiscounted Cash Prices for Cardiovascular Medications by Type of US Community Pharmacy.
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jan;36(1):114-120. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06149-7. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
5
Association of household income and adverse outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Heart. 2020 Nov;106(21):1679-1685. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-316065. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
6
Primary Care, Health Promotion, and Disease Prevention with Michigan Medicaid Expansion.
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Mar;35(3):800-807. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05370-3. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
7
Association Between Health Insurance Literacy and Avoidance of Health Care Services Owing to Cost.
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Nov 2;1(7):e184796. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.4796.
8
The Next Generation of Diabetes Translation: A Path to Health Equity.
Annu Rev Public Health. 2019 Apr 1;40:391-410. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040218-044158. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
10
Value-Based Insurance Design Improves Medication Adherence Without An Increase In Total Health Care Spending.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Jul;37(7):1057-1064. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1633.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验